Jeśli jesteś właścicielem tej strony, możesz wyłączyć reklamę poniżej zmieniając pakiet na PRO lub VIP w panelu naszego hostingu już od 4zł!
Totalizm: the philosophy of happy and fulfilled life
(multilingual, e.g. in English For English version click on this flag, Polish Dla polskiej wersji kliknij na ta flage, etc.)
Updated:
25 May 2017

Most recent update: adding item #A2.11


Menu 1:

(Choice of language:)


(Organising:)

Homepage

Links

Menu 2

Menu 4

FAQ

Text [11] in PDF


(In English here:)

Totalizm

Totalizm in PDF

Source replica of this page

Parasitism

Moral laws

Karma

Free will

The Bible

God

Proof for the existence of God

Proof of soul

Prophecies

Nirvana

Immortality

Concept of Dipolar Gravity

Solar energy

Free energy

Telekinetic cell

Sonic boiler

Telekinetics

Zero pollution cars

Telekinesis

Telekinesis Free Zone

Telepathy

Earthquake

Seismograph

Artefact

Concept of Dipolar Gravity

Totalizm

Parasitism

Karma

Moral laws

Nirvana

Proof of soul

Time vehicles

Immortality

Propulsion

Magnocraft

Oscillatory Chamber

Military use of magnocraft

Tapanui

New Zealand

New Zealand attractions

Evidence of UFO activities

UFO photographs

Cloud-UFOs

Bandits amongst us

Tornado

Hurricanes

Katrina

Landslides

Demolition of hall in Katowice

Predators

26th day

Petone

Prophecies

Plague

Changelings

WTC

Columbia

Aliens

UFOnauts

Formal proof for the existence of UFOs

Evil

Antichrist

About God

Proof for the existence of God

God's methods

The Bible

Free will

Truth

Dr Jan Pajak portfolio

About me (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak)

Old "about me"

My job search

Aleksander Możajski

Pigs from Chinese zodiac

Pigs Photos

Healing

Tropical fruit

Fruit folklore

Food handling

Evolution of humans

All-in-one

Greek keyboard

Russian keyboard

Solving Rubik's cube 3x3=9

Solving Rubik's cube 4x4=16

Jan's playlists (only under "Google Chrome")

Instruction of playlists

Wrocław

Malbork

Milicz

Battle of Milicz

St. Andrea Bobola

Village Cielcza

Village Stawczyk

Wszewilki

Wszewilki of tomorrow

Korea

Hosta

1964 class of Ms Hass in Milicz

TUWr graduates 1970

Lectures 1999

Lectures 2001

Lectures 2004

Lectures 2007

Better humanity

Pajak for parliament 2014

Pajak regarding 2017

Pajak for parliament 2017

Party of totalizm

Party of totalizm statute

FAQ - questions

Replicate

Memorial

Sabotages

Index of content with links

Menu 2

Menu 4

Source replica of page menu

Text [11] in PDF

Text [8e/2]

Text [8e]

Text [7]

Text [7/2]

Text [6/2]

Text [5/3]

Figs [5/3]

Text [2e]

Figures [2e]: 1, 2, 3

Text [1e]

Figures [1e]: 1, 2, 3

X text [1/4]

Monograph [1/4]:
E, 1, 2, 3, P, X

Monograph [1/5]



(Po polsku tutaj:)

Totalizm

Totalizm w PDF

Źródłowa replika tej strony

Pasożytnictwo

Prawa moralne

Karma

Wolna wola

Biblia

Bóg

Dowód na istnienie Boga

Dowód na duszę

Przepowiednie

Nirwana

Nieśmiertelność

Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji

Energia słoneczna

Darmowa energia

Telekinetyczne ogniwo

Grzałka soniczna

Telekinetyka

Samochody bez spalin

Telekineza

Strefa wolna od telekinezy

Telepatia

Trzęsienia ziemi

Sejsmograf

Artyfakt

Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji

Totalizm

Pasożytnictwo

Karma

Prawa moralne

Nirwana

Dowód na duszę

Wehikuły czasu

Nieśmiertelność

Napędy

Magnokraft

Komora oscylacyjna

Militarne użycie magnokraftu

Tapanui

Nowa Zelandia

Atrakcje Nowej Zelandii

Dowody działań UFO na Ziemi

Fotografie UFO

Chmury-UFO

Bandyci wśród nas

Tornado

Huragany

Katrina

Lawiny ziemne

Zburzenie hali w Katowicach

Ludobójcy

26ty dzień

Petone

Przepowiednie

Plaga

Podmieńcy

WTC

Columbia

Kosmici

UFOnauci

Formalny dowód na istnienie UFO

Zło

Antychryst

O Bogu naukowo

Dowód na istnienie Boga

Metody Boga

Biblia

Wolna wola

Prawda

Dr Jan Pajak portfolio

O mnie (dr inż. Jan Pająk)

Starsze "o mnie"

Poszukuję pracy

Aleksander Możajski

Świnka z chińskiego zodiaku

Zdjęcia ozdobnych świnek

Radości po 60-tce

Kuramina

Uzdrawianie

Owoce tropiku

Owoce w folklorze

Postępowanie z żywnością

Ewolucja ludzi

Wszystko-w-jednym

Grecka klawiatura

Rosyjska klawiatura

Rozwiązanie kostki Rubika 3x3=9

Rozwiązanie kostki Rubika 4x4=16

Playlisty Jana (tylko pod "Google Chrome")

Instrukcja do playlist

Wrocław

Malbork

Milicz

Bitwa o Milicz

Św. Andrzej Bobola

Liceum Ogólnokształcące w Miliczu

Klasa Pani Hass z LO Milicz

Absolwenci PWr 1970

Nasz rok

Wykłady 1999

Wykłady 2001

Wykłady 2004

Wykłady 2007

Wieś Cielcza

Wieś Stawczyk

Wszewilki

Zwiedzaj Wszewilki i Milicz

Wszewilki jutra

Zlot "Wszewilki-2007"

Unieważniony Zjazd "2007"

Poprzedni Zlot "2006"

Raport Zlotu "2006"

Korea

Hosta

Lepsza ludzkość

Pająk do sejmu NZ 2014

Pajak na Prezydenta 2015

Pajak na Prezydenta 2020

Pajak dla prezydentury 2020

Partia totalizmu

Statut partii totalizmu

FAQ - częste pytania

Replikuj

Memoriał

Sabotaże

Skorowidz

Menu 2

Menu 4

Źródłowa replika strony menu

Tekst [11] w PDF

Tekst [10] w PDF

Tekst [8p/2]

Tekst [8p]

Tekst [7]

Tekst [7/2]

Tekst [7b]

Tekst [6/2]

[5/4]: 1, 2, 3

Tekst [4c]: 1, 2, 3

Tekst [4b]

Tekst [3b]

Tekst [2]

[1/3]: 1, 2, 3

X tekst [1/4]

Monografia [1/4]:
P, 1, 2, 3, E, X

Monografia [1/5]


(Hier auf Deutsch:)

Dr Jan Pająk portfolio

Über mich

Freie Energie

Gott Existiert

Malbork

Moralische Gesetze

Seismographen

Telekinesis

Totalizm

Text [5d]

Menu 2

Menu 4

Quelreplica dieser Seite


(Aquí en espańol:)

Energía libre

Telekinesis

Leyes morales

Totalizm

Sobre mí

Menu 2

Menu 4

Reproducción de la fuente de esta página


(Ici en français:)

Énergie libre

Telekinesis

Lois morales

Totalizm

Au sujet de moi

Menu 2

Menu 4

Reproduction de source de cette page


(Qui in italiano:)

Energia libera

Telekinesis

Leggi morali

Totalizm

Circa me

Menu 2

Menu 4

Replica di fonte di questa pagina




Menu 2:

(scrollable)

(Here is the list of all web pages from this server, arranged by language (in 8 languages). Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this page to run it:)

Here the page menu2.htm should be displayed.

(The same list can be displayed from "Menu 1" by clicking over there on "Menu 2".)



Menu 3: (Alternative addresses of this web page:)

(On paid servers:)

totalizm.pl

energia.sl.pl

totalizm.com.pl

pajak.org.nz

(On free hosting but with FTP:)

cielcza.cba.pl

magnocraft.site88.net

quake.hostami.me

geocities.ws/immortality

telekinesis.esy.es

(Rarely updated)

tornados2005.narod.ru

dhost.info/nirvana

morals.mypressonline.com

freewebs.com/1970r

alert.1hwy.com

pajak.20fr.com

pigs.20megsfree.com

prawda.20fr.com

telekinesis.50megs.com

telekinesis.50megs.com

totalizm.fanspace.com

totalizm.20fr.com

truenirvana.20m.com

ufonauts.20m.com

ufonauci.w.interia.pl




Menu 4:

(scrollable)

Here is the list of addresses of all totaliztic web sites that still worked at the date of the most recent update of this web page. At each of these addresses should be available all totaliztic web pages listed in "Menu 1" or "Menu 2", including also their different language versions (i.e. versions in languages: Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select the address which you wish to open by dragging scroll bars in small window below, then click on this address to run it. When opens the web page which represents this address, then choose from its "Manu 1" or "Menu 2" the web page which interests you and click on it to view that page:

Here the page menu.htm should be displayed.

(The above list can also be displayed from "Menu 1" by clicking Menu 4.)


If the reader wishes to view a short filmed illustration of the principles of operation of the philosophy of totalizm described here, and the illustration of scientific foundations on which the philosophy of totalizm was formulated, then I encourage the reader to watch around 35 minute long video film with my scientific portfolio, available (for free) on YouTube. This film is entitled "Dr Jan Pająk portfolio" and it is available in English, in Polish (po polsku) and in German (auf Deutsch). The more detailed descriptions, internet addresses, links, and leaflets promoting this excellently-designed and produced HD and HQ film, are provided in item #J9 from this web page, as well as on the separate web page named portfolio.htm - which is entirely devoted to explaining the content and main ideas of this film. The portfolio.htm web page is available at all frequently upddated addresses with totaliztic web pages, e.g. at easy to remember pajak.org.nz and pajak.org.nz/portfolio.htm, as well as totalizm.com.pl/portfolio.htm.
Have a pleasant viewing,
Dr Eng. Jan Pająk - the creator of totalizm


INTRODUCTION:
This web page explains the essence of currently the most moral and most progressive philosophy on Earth created by man, called "totalizm". (Notice that the human origin of totalizm is intentionally emphasized here, because totalizm recognises, reinforces and documents the superiority of the Bible.) Therefore this web page indicates what are benefits from practicing totalizm, describes how to practice totalizm, makes available free textbooks of totalizm, defines basic ideas of totalizm (such as "moral field", "moral energy", "moral laws", etc.), explains the origins of totalizm, reveals relationships of totalizm with the scientific theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and explains everything that initially is worth to know about totalizm. This web page indicates also verifiable for everyone body of evidence which confirms that totalizm is correct, that it works in real life, and that it really delivers what is described here.



Part #A: Examples how totalizm helps to solve everyday problems - means examples of a first category of benefits from practicing totalizm:

      

#A1. Recipes of atheistic science would be correct only in the world deprived of God, but in the world ruled by God everything depends on morality - as this is explained by the philosophy of totalizm:

Motto: "Quality of everything depends on the correctness of foundations on which it was build - so even the most majestic palace build on bog, ice or quick sand must collapse."

       The non-admitted openly scientific "foundation" of the old "atheistic orthodox science" (i.e. this official human science which we learn in schools and at universities and which still carries out exclusively "a posteriori" research - as this is defined in item #A2.6 below) is the non-written and highly erroneous assumption that in there is NO God in the universe, and thus that everything is ruled by "deprived of intelligence" and "blind" laws of nature. This assumption initially resulted from the completely thoughtless use of so-called "Occam's Razor", but later it was adopted for the ideological foundation of present official science. What even worse, this old official science seems to stubbornly ignore the fact, that such "a world without God" would drastically differ from "the world created and governed by intelligent God". Thus these drastic differences between both these world could reveal only the new "totaliztic science". (For examples of differences between the old, official "atheistic orthodox science", and the new "totaliztic science" - see items #C1 to #C6 from my web page named telekinetics.htm. In turn for examples of these differences - see items #B1 and #B2 on the web page named changelings.htm.) This old science stubbornly ignores also the fact documented and even formally proven by the new "totaliztic science", that the world in which we live displays all attributes of the world created and intelligently ruled by omnipotent God - that formal proof is presented in item #B3 of the abovementioned web page named "changelings.htm". Hence this old atheistic science still disseminates amongst people the picture of life and the surrounding reality, that would be correct only if the universe really is NOT ruled intelligently by God. After all, for example in such a world without God, in fact everything would be like it is told to us by this old atheistic science. Thus, for example "women would be exact copies of men" - and therefore "women would be able to do everything that men can do" (and vice versa), the life of intelligent beings (i.e. so-called "intellects") would rule a leaden Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest", every war would be wan by militarily most powerful side, the immoral acting would be the most beneficial, happiness would be proportional to richness, and thus only rich people could be happy while all poor people would need to be unhappy. Greatest successes in life would accomplish children of rich parents - since they would have the best conditions for growth and the most careful upbringing. In turn secure and peaceful lives would lead mainly people with power - after all only they would have the greatest choice where to live and how to protect themselves. In turn e.g. health and longevity would only be proportional to the correctness of eating, amount of exercises, and quality of rest, thus most healthy and most log-living would become people from the most rich countries.
       On the other hand, in the world ruled intelligently by God, everything must work on completely different principles. After all, is such a world, for example "women are created by God as an extension and complement of men" (i.e. NOT as exact copies of men) - so that the union of men and women creates completely new quality which is much more rich and more perfect than both these genders composing it (as more comprehensively this is explained in item #B2 on the web page named antichrist.htm). The life of intelligent creatures in such a world is ruled by the highly justly principle of the "survival of most moral" (for details see item #G1 on the web page named will.htm) - which replaces the Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest" that for the intelligent creatures would work only in the world deprived of wise God, while in the world ruled by God that can be manifested only towards wild animals deprived of conscience. In the final count every war is lost by the country (or countries) of aggressors - see #E3 on the web page named bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm. One amongst numerous "punishments" served by God to everyone who acted immorally, is the invalidation in the long-term work of moral mechanisms of all benefits that this person accomplished for the short-term due to his or her immoral acting, combined with the additional escalation of problems for solving of which this immoral acting originally was taken - for details see item #C4.2 from my web page named morals.htm, item #J1 from my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm, or item #B6 from my web page named p_instruction.htm. In the world governed by wise God the greatest successes in life and highest level of happiness experience people raised in circumstances opposite to the rich "glasshouses" - means raised accordingly to God's "principle of reversals" described, amongst others, in item #B1.1 from the web page antichrist.htm, in item #F3 from the web page wszewilki_uk.htm, and also in item #A2.10 below on this web page. Furthermore, in such God's world, for example happiness, security, health, or longevity, represents "rewards" which this intelligent God gives only to those ones who live accordingly to His commandments. Thus, in the world with God, practically everything is depend on "morality" that someone practices, NOT on richness that he or she accumulated, power gained, or just on food and exercises. It is so because in the world ruled by God by "morality" we should understand the strictness with which someone fulfils God's commandments in the everyday life - for more information on this definition see item #B5 on the web page named morals.htm.
       If we look carefully around the world in which we live, then it turns out that principles and guidelines issued to people by the old "atheistic orthodox science" lead us to nowhere, and completely fail to prove themselves in the real life. After all, it is this atheistic orthodox science that caused such big mass which we now see around us in the world. This is because the old science ignored completely the fact, that "in the world governed by God, morality of people is the key to everything" (while the Bible is the key to morality). Notice here, that in this world governed by God "morality" must be understood the same as it is defined by the philosophy of totalizm, e.g. as the abovementioned "harmony with which requirements issued by God are obeyed in human behaviours" - for the totaliztic definition of "morality" see abovementioned item #B5 on the web page named "morals.htm".) Hence, from someone's "morality" depends whether this someone is happy, gains the respect of others, has kind of partner and neighbours, has enough food, etc. As this is proven on examples in item #C1 from the web page named quake.htm, item #I3 from the web page named petone.htm, item #G1 from the web page named will.htm, or item #E3 and #I2 from the web page named bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm, it is the level of someone's morality, that decides whether a given person, community, or nation lives in peace and security, or rather is troubled by cataclysms, terrorism, wars, crimes, suicides, premature deaths, etc. Also on the morality depends e.g. the inventiveness, and thus also the level of technology and wealth, as well as breakthrough scientific discoveries (as I explained this in more details e.g. in item #B4.4 from the web page named mozajski_uk.htm. and also in item #G1 from the web page named eco_cars.htm - both of which items described the action of the so-called "curse of inventors" which destroys creative people in countries with a low level of morality). It is because of the too-low so-called "group morality" - i.e. the morality described in item #E2 below, or more strictly because of too high "group immorality", that in the majority of present countries of the world an official implementation of the "real progress" is NOT possible anymore. (Such a "real progress" depends on the accomplishing e.g. truly breakthrough inventions and really new scientific discoveries - as these are defined in item #G4 from the web page named eco_cars.htm.) Only achievements that these countries are accomplishing at present represent a "false progress" - which depends on the multiple "chumming again" whatever is already known to the humanity for a long time. (E.g. all signs seems to indicate, that for some time now such a making of "real progress", i.e. truly breakthrough inventions and new discoveries, apparently ceased to be possible even in the USA - means in the country which until recently was leading the world in inventiveness and in scientific discoveries. In turn already for a long time it is difficult to hear about the existence of any world-famous inventor or a genius scientists, who would officially carry out his creativity e.g. in Australia, New Zealand, or present Poland. The reason always seem to be the same - i.e. shifting in there to practicing a wrong kind of "group morality" which is based e.g. on a momentary belief of "atheistic luminaries of science", or on behaviours of politicians, rich people, or celebrities, instead of on timeless commands of God.) The attribute of inhabitants of countries which are characterised by incorrect "group morality" is, that unanimously they destroy and persecute these their countrymen, who do NOT follow the "sheep trend", policies of authorities, or fashion from a given country, but they have own opinion about a given matter - as e.g. in New Zealand was persecuted and destroyed Richard Pearse. This is where originates the "curse of inventors" which rages in there, as well as the "inventive impotency" which stems from this curse.
       God issued to people a whole array of guidelines, according to which He wishes that people voluntarily live, and the level of fulfilment of which God uses for His judgement whether a given person or community is to be "rewarded" or "punished" (e.g. with cataclysms). These God’s guidelines, or commandments, can be found in all religions, and also in all holy books, e.g. in the Bible. But the religious manner of writing of these moral guidelines has several drawbacks. For example, they are written with quite an ancient language - which present people avoid to respect. Furthermore, in order to inspire people to seek knowledge creatively, God revealed with the use of religion only "what" rules of morality people should voluntarily obey, but He did NOT explain "why" people should stick to these rules. For this reason, there was a need to develop the "philosophy of totalizm" and a new science based on this philosophy - which the author calls the "totaliztic science". The philosophy of totalizm and the totaliztic science objectively research goals, methods, and ways of God, using for this research most sound and modern scientific methods. Then they formulate moral guidelines for the human behaviour, based on results of this research. As the outcome, totalizm arrives to the same moral recommendations as these commanded by the Bible. But in addition, these recommendations of totalizm are already expressed in present (modern) language, for each one of them totalizm indicates the justification "why" it needs to be obeyed, and together with each one of them totalizm explains what goal, intention, or method of God's action causes that this moral principle should be voluntarily obeyed by people. Sub-items from the item #A2 of this web page, summarise several examples of just such principles of moral behaviour worked out by totalizm. These examples are to illustrate the essence of outcomes of my research, as well as attributes of this currently the most moral, most modern, most correct, and the most progressive philosophy on the Earth created by a man.


#A1.1. The most vital advice of totalizm: do NOT be fooled by the short-term consequences of "moral field" work, which seem to "reward immorality" and "persecute morality":

Motto: "Are you NOT puzzled why lives of people are formed into one long chain of moral lessons, tests and exams? After all, continuous lessons, tests and exams may have only one goal - namely selecting a few best of the best, from a large crowd of already good ones."

       I cannot stop marvelling over the genius of pre-programmed by God the so-called "principle of contradiction between the short-term and long-term effects of the work of moral field" - discovered only by totalizm and briefly summarized in item #H2 of this web page, while accurately described, among others, in items #C4.2.1 and #C4.2 of the web page named morals.htm and illustrated in "Fig. #I1" from the web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm. This contradiction (reversal) of effects allows that in the short-term work of moral field for all impatient and blind people may appear that "immorality pays off", but simultaneously that in the long-term work of moral field the justice is restored, because immoral acting people are severely punished, while morally acting people are handsomely rewarded. As a result, this reversal of short-term and long-term work of "moral field" allows God to quickly classify subsequent people and group intellects to the moral or immoral classes (after which classifying they can be treated as it is explained in item #C4.7 from the web page morals.htm), to check people's readiness for accepting the moral lessons and for implementing these lessons in everyday lives, to test the intelligence and dedication of subsequent people, to check who is suited for the future coexistence with God, while who systematically breaks moral criteria and thus must be removed prematurely from this world according to the described below in #A2.7 "principle of the extinction of most immoral intellects", etc., etc. That is precisely because of this reversal, when you do something morally correct, then rather be happy and treat it as a "good omen" if immediately (i.e. during the completion of given activities) you come across various obstacles and problems. However, begin to act very carefully and wisely (even to the point of abandoning a given activity) if everything goes for you "like a Swiss clockwork" and if all circumstances seem to help you in whatever you are doing as well as instantly reward you for what you are doing - means when the behaviour of moral field seem to indicate that you just carry out an immoral activity. The reasons for which I give you here this advice you may learn after the careful reading, among others, abovementioned items #C4.2.1 and #C4.2 from the web page named morals.htm, and also after reading the other totaliztic publications which illustrate examples and explain the operation of "moral field", for example items #N1 as well as #B5 and #F3 from the web page named solar.htm, items #B4 and #C2 from the web page named pajak_re_2017.htm, item #I2 from the web page named bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm, etc., etc. Here I explain only, that in a world ruled by all-powerful and all-seeing God, the "immoral acting" NEVER pays off, because all the apparent benefits that in the short-term work of moral field seems to bring the violation of moral criteria, are carefully invalidated in the long-term work of moral field, at the same time all the problems which a given immoral acting supposed to solve are escalated further - as excellent examples of just such invalidation of the apparent benefits of immoral acting and the escalation of problems that it supposed to solve, consider the consequences of immoral implementation of pesticides, antibiotics, and the theory of relativity described in item #J1 from my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm. Thus, the only human acting which actually brings permanent benefits, is the acting that fulfils the criteria of morality (i.e. which is the pedantically moral acting) - for explanations see item #B4 of my web page named pajak_re_2017.htm.
       Until now only a small handful of people bothered to learn about powerful tools that God has created to be able to precisely control literally every second of life of each person. These tools have only recently been discovered due to the use of different research methods of the new "totaliztic science" - while under the names "omniplan" and "reversible software time" are summarized, among others, in the introduction and in item #G4 of my web page named dipolar_gravity.htm, and are described in detail in items #C4 and #C4.1 from another my web page named immortality.htm. But even without the knowledge of these powerful tools of God, still those more perceptive individuals eventually notice, that the life of every human has too many regularities and similarities to be governed just by "pure coincidences" - as erroneously makes us to believe the present official science. After all, "pure coincidences" are NOT e.g. able to cause, that practically every person sustains roughly similar amount of happiness and successes as well as misfortunes and problems - and this irrespective of his/her wealth or power, that all events which affect us display attributes of moral lessons, or that the fate of each person is controlled by the level of passing moral exams. All this together further confirms the truth about which I am warning in the motto to this item - namely, that to morality is worth to devote our utmost attention, because the way it impacts our lives proves that it serves for the immensely important choosing of the very few best of the best from a sizeable group of already quite perfect. In turn where such a choice takes place, there is also a certainty, that later it is to serve for an equally important further consequences.
       After learning the above categorical finding of "totalizm", that "immorality never pays off", and after learning the finding of the new "totaliztic science" that "immorality is one amongst the tools used to educate people and to examine their suitability for divine purposes", in the reader probably arises the question "why in present times so many people deliberately close their eyes to the truth and choose the irrational belief that in life it is beneficial to behave immorally?" The answer to this question is equally complex as that proverbial "Gordian knot". After all, in order to properly respond to it, we have to agree, among others, with what in details is explained in item #B1.1 from the web page named antichrist.htm - namely that God purposely so designs our life, that with the help of the consequences of work of the "principle of reversals" our life is upbringing us into "soldiers of God" hardened in overcoming every kind of difficulties, and that all events which affect us in life are designed in advance to serve as "moral lessons" honed in us lasting habits of morally correct behaviour, and to test (examine) the level at which we are already implementing the principles of morally correct conduct. However, I still will try to "cut" here through that "Gordian knot" to show the reader what it is composed of. Here are the most common upbringing activities and subsequent moral tests or exams, to which we are constantly subjected (although most of us do not have the slightest idea about their existence), supplemented by my brief explanation of "why" every one of them makes an impression as if it rewards immorality while punishes morally correct behaviour:
       1. Test on respect for moral traditions. In my opinion the primary reason for increasingly common today erroneous belief that "immorality pays off", is the testing of our respect for the morally-correct traditions. The reason for this test is that people who cannot bring themselves to respect the past and traditions which created them, cannot also bring themselves to respect anything else, including their own parents and God. In this test, for example the "toys" that our ancestors had to invent, because until recently they have NOT existed (e.g. computers, cell-phones, colour television, jet planes, cars, etc.) are used to amaze and to tell today's generations of people, that due to the use of such "trinkets" these generations supposedly become "more superior" than generations of these ancestors who invented these "toys" - see descriptions of the generation of "Midases in reverse" from items #K5 and #K6 of the web page tapanui.htm. In turn, by being such supposedly "better" generations, they have the right to "trample with their boots" over the traditions of our ancestors, which traditions already have proven themselves working for thousands of years. So some people fooled by those "trinkets", actually trample, among others, over the already established for a long time e.g. the Bible verses and folk wisdom stating that "immorality never pays off" - e.g. consider what percentage of people today takes notice of the true importance of the proverb "Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small", or the Polish-language counterpart of it, stating that "God does not act rapidly, but acts justy" (in Polish: "Bóg nierychliwy ale sprawiedliwy").
       2. Test on believing today's mass media, that advocate "quick successes" achieved at any cost, but remain silent about the long-term consequences of immoral actions. All our current mass media (including television) are so controlled, that they produce long programs on "how effortlessly get a quick success in life", but that typically they are silent about disclosing to audiences "what happened in the long-term work of moral field with all those people who almost effortlessly achieved rapid success in life" (i.e. "what after the elapse of so-called. 'time of karma return' happened to these people, about whom moral field and moral mechanisms knew in advance that they belong to those 'bad trees that are to yield only bad fruit' " - described in item #C4.7 from the web page named morals.htm, and hence whom the "moral field" in its short-term work "helped" to get a success in life).
       3. The test on believing in claims of official science, which does NOT hide its atheism and openly avoids researching of the actual work of moral field and moral mechanisms - and thus which fulfils the Biblical definition of a "bad tree that is NOT going to yield good fruit" (for more details see item #C4.7 from the web page morals.htm and item #K1 from the web page named tapanui.htm). This test checks the people's belief in false and constantly changed claims of present, official, monopolistic science, i.e. the belief persisting in spite that these people know that the present official science has been built on atheistic (i.e. false) foundations, that it refuses to undertake research on requirements of "true morality" (about requirements of "true morality" almost everyone knows, that these can originate only from God), and that as such, according to the Bible, the present official science is NOT able to give birth to any "good fruit", but yields only "bad fruit" that will only harm those people who are greedy enough to eat it. In general terms, this test boils down to checking whom a given person is to believe, when he or she is forced to choose between whatever in a given matter indicate our senses, logic, empirical experience, evidence, etc., but what is officially denied by scientists who look at the world from armchairs and through thick windows of their "ivory towers" - as an excellent example of the necessity of making just such a choice, see descriptions from item #E2 of the web page named cloud_ufo.htm. For example, this test checks whether a given person is already deterred by the situation, that the present official and monopolistic science - which leads a highly prosperous and trouble-free life due to research-grants received from the power-hungry politicians and from the greedy industries (e.g. armaments), has NO courage to promote any morally-correct truth, e.g. the truth that "in the long-term work of moral mechanisms every war is always lost by an aggressor" - broadly explained, among others, in item #I2 from the web page bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm, that this science constantly changes its official statements and the contents of its textbooks, that is growing the number of its findings and statements that appear to be mutually contradictory, that instead of promoting the progress, this science persecutes and holds down every new ideas that are incompatible with its atheistic doctrines - such as, for example, the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, or the starship called the Magnocraft, etc., etc. From what I noticed, this exam on belief in the claims of present official science, especially commonly fail women - obviously the opinions of titled experts mean for them more than logic, evidence, and common sense. For example, it is sufficient that somewhere they read an interview with someone with numerous titles, that, for example, allegedly smoking reduces overweight, and immediately they throw themselves onto cigarettes, knowing that these are to kill not only them, but also their family members. Just it suffices that some prize-winning researcher of e.g. cranks recommends in TV to NOT discipline children, but rather keep convincing them like adults, and immediately they report to police if anyone tries to implement what the Bible commands about the disciplining of small brats. It is just enough that in an illustrated magazine they read that a celebrity wife of some rich doctor eats certain weeds, instead of meals, and immediately this weed becomes the only dish in dinners NOT only for themselves, but also for their husbands and families. It just suffices that on the Internet they read what some dictatorial government state regarding salt, and immediately they ignore thousands of years of natural regulation of the demand for salt by our senses of taste and thirst, and force the whole family to eat everything without salt (see #D2 on the web page named healing.htm). Etc., etc.
       4. The tests on noticing distortions of virtually all religious institutions. About testing of our level of noticing the deviations of practically all religious institutions in today's world one could write whole volumes (e.g. see item #A2.7 from this web page). But if we try to summarize these tests in a few sentences, they boil down, among others, to examining: (1) our noticing and remedying of the increasingly deeper departure of religions from doing what God commands them to do in holy books, but instead implementation of whatever imperfect human leaders of these religions tell others that they ought to do, (2) noticing and correcting the disappearance of teaching morality by religions, (3) noticing the avoidance of religions to research scientifically God's methods of work which are commonly used in the present everyday life, (4) remedying the negligence of religions in the empirical checking and confirming of every religious truth (in turn truths, which were NOT subjected to rigorous checking and confirming that later can be verified and approved by practically every interested person, cannot change their status from "belief" into "certainty"), (5) stopping the politicization of religions - that is, stopping the caring of religions mainly about the power over people and about the political influence and income, instead about the service for God. Etc., etc.
       5. The tests on knowledge of the work of moral field and moral mechanisms. For example, each one of us is repetitively taught and then examined whether he/she is already aware of the fact, that in the short-term work of moral field and moral mechanisms these tools of God only give an impression that "immorality pays off", while the actual punishment for immorality comes only in the long-term work of moral field and moral mechanisms - it is summarised in item #H2 from this web page, while in detail it is explained in item #C4.2 of the web page morals.htm.
       6. The test on the enthusiasm for persecuting and on hostility directed at everything that is moral - e.g. on every truth, on the "philosophy of totalizm", on the new "totaliztic science", etc. In this moral exam, people with immoral tendencies are "provoked" to attack and to suppress everything that is morally correct - e.g. every truth. It is from this test that originate, for example, such phenomena as the "curse of inventors", or as the vicious suppression with which the "philosophy of totalizm" and the new "totaliztic science" are troubled by various immoral forces - for examples of some forms of such suppression, see item #B5 from my web page named tapanui.htm, or items #J1 and #P5.1 from my web page named quake.htm. As another example of such suppression I should also disclose here that, for example, whenever in my professional life of an university professor I met up with the announcement of a university position in philosophical sciences focused on research and development of new philosophy, I always applied for this position - justifying my application by the need to further develop the already widely known in the world my philosophy of totalizm devoted to the "true morality". But in spite that I made hundreds of applications for such positions, and in spite that already then the achievements of totalizm exceeded everything that other philosophers have developed so far in the area of our learning the principles of moral mechanisms, NOT even a single of my applications was ever successful. Today's official science clearly does NOT want to have anything to do with academics who study and popularize the truth about the work of "true morality". (Note here, how extremely difficult it is to research and to popularize the knowledge about the true work of mechanisms of morality, if one is constantly expelled from the job, and if the bulk of one's energy must be spend on earning the bread and on keeping alive by lecturing e.g. the Software Engineering that is avoided by other professors and has little to do with what one is actually researching, and also if one is surrounded by a collection of hostile people who shout insults and continually put down of what one has already managed to accomplish.)
       7. The test on such programming of the current systems of governance (including virtually all of today's democracies), which causes almost exclusively immoral actions of governments. It is this test that causes, that if someone matches today's decisions of governments to moral criteria - which matching, among others, sometimes I do and which also should periodically be done by every other citizen familiar with work of "actual morality", then it turns out that practically almost everything that today's governments make or decide, breaks various criteria of morality, and thus in the long-term work of moral field all the benefits that initially stemmed from it must be cancelled as the punishment, while the problems that these measures or laws were to solve must be escalated as the punishment. As excellent examples of today's breaking of moral criteria consider the presently existing "privacy laws" - that help to hide from people the committed immoralities and hamper learning about the actual work of moral field and moral mechanisms, or consider the introduced almost everywhere GST (also known as VAT), which works like sand thrown in the gears of working machine, and which is ruining economically the country that recklessly has introduced it - for details see items #T1 to #T5 from my web page named humanity.htm. More information on the subject of contradictive to moral criteria activities of governments can be found, among others, in items #J1 and #I1 from my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm, and items #B1 to #B8 from my web page named pajak_re_2017.htm.
       Of course, there is incomparably more moral lessons, tests and examinations similar to those listed above. Here I indicated just a few most common examples.
       I was always intrigued by the thoughtlessness of people who play the "armchair philosophers", and with a loud voice full of admiration for the shrewdness of their own mind deliver in public opinions such as "we cannot believe in the existence of God, when we see the enormity of suffering, trouble and struggles of men, when we see little kids dying from some painful illness, as well as when we see microbes, mosquitoes, tapeworms, venomous snakes, crocodiles ..." Hearing this kinds of opinions I want to ask: "if you were god, would you create the world without pain, struggles, challenges, lessons, exams, work, deadly organisms, etc., which would be filled only with pleasures, self-supplying refrigerators and cups to which the supply of tasty wines and drinks would never have ended?" And if YES, then what you would do with those billions of immortal people that are used exclusively to pleasure and that cannot themselves do anything other than emptying their self-supplying refrigerators and cups? Yet you could not kill them, because death is also unpleasant. You could not order them to do anything, because the work is, after all, the effort, challenge, exam and the requirement to acquire skills - that is also a whole series of unpleasantness. (I am NOT going here to philosophize that even pleasure, in which one is forced to live for eternity, with time has become an unpleasant chore.) For many years in different places of my publications I am explaining to this type of "armchair philosophers", that a world devoid of pain, unpleasantness, threats, fears, struggle, demands, laws, homework, exams, challenges, responsibilities, work, etc., would be an useless form of nightmare and hell - just only an extremely inexperienced creator would agree to create and maintain it for longer than a short initial period of the childhood and learning of first humans. In addition, all-righteous God, like ours, even in the world having all of these unpleasant "attractions", can so choose who has to meet which kind of unpleasantness, that nothing unpleasant affects people who previously did NOT deserve it. Examples of publications explaining and documenting these facts, may be: item #A3 from my web page named god_proof.htm, item #G1 from my web page named will.htm, item #D3 from my web page named god_exists.htm, and items #D1 to #D6 from my web page named newzealand_visit.htm that summarize the role of "paradise". However, seeing the universality of such a misunderstanding of the constructive, motivating and balancing role that for people fulfils the pain, death, fear, responsibilities, lessons, exams, work, challenges, etc., I suspect that one day I should write and allow to read, a full article similar to this one, which would explain to this type of "armchair philosophers" what a useless nightmare and hell would be the creation and maintaining of a world filled up only with pleasures - after which writing, in this place I should place a link to such an article.
       Although what I have described in this item is only an advice from totalizm, NOT e.g. the law or an explanation, still it reveals that in view of the increasingly widespread "failing" of moral tests and examinations by people, on one hand we should sympathize with those people, what systematically fail these trials. (After all, NOT without the reason a wise proverb states that "everyone receives in life what he or she previously has earned".) On the other hand, we should treat as a kind of miracle and the reason to wonder, that in today's world there is still existing this handful of exceptionally special people, who in spite of everything, know, openly insist and keep proving to everyone, that for certain "immorality does not pay off". (In item #I1 from my web page named quake.htm these exceptional individuals are described under the Biblical name of "righteous".) As it can be seen, "the philosophy of totalizm" and born from it the new "totaliztic science" are now having the increasingly difficult task ahead - i.e. to re-disclose to typical people today, what is NOT revealed to them neither by present religions, by present official science and education, by present governments, nor by famous people providing role-models, i.e. to re-disclose what a huge mistake people make due to their short-sighted belief that "immorality pays off", as well as people make due to the behaviour resulting from the belief that supposedly "morally correct behaviour totally does not count in life."


#A2. Let us learn several examples of general guidelines on how to act in our lives (i.e. guidelines identified, worked out and recommended by the philosophy of totalizm):

Motto: "Since the ancient times people seek a 'medicine for everything'. Such a medicine really exists - it is called 'morality'. Only that in order to use it effectively, it is necessary to know the philosophy of totalizm."

       If someone already learned the entire philosophy of totalizm, then also learned mechanisms and principles which God uses in His control over fate of people and in His guiding us to behaviours that God expects from us. In turn, after learning these mechanisms and principles, our knowledge as to how act in specific life situations becomes automatic. But this web page is mainly addressed for people, who do NOT know totalizm yet. Thus, in order to illustrate also for them how look-like general guidelines for our acting in everyday life - as recommended by the philosophy of totalizm, below I am indicating several examples of these guidelines. All examples provided here stem from the consequently implemented by God "principles of guiding" people into the most desirable behaviours which God expects from us - i.e. principles described also in item #C6 from my another web page named god_exists.htm. The examples presented below reveal recommendations of totaliztic behaviours in the face of most common problems of everyday lives. Of course, a wider and more complete set of recommendations is explained in textbooks of totalizm - listed in item #A4 below.


#A2.1. In making decisions "always do exact opposite of whatever is indicated by the 'line of the least moral resistance' ":

       In our everyday life we continually must make decisions on how we should act or what we should do in a given situation. The complacency and inborn human laziness push us to choose the action which lies on the so-called "line of the least intellectual resistance". Unfortunately, decisions and actions that follow the "line of the least intellectural resistance" always after some elapse of time turn out to be wrong and immoral. Thus, always then they prove themselves to be detrimental, always must be corrected, always the decision maker is charged with the moral responsibility for damages that they cause, and always one needs to live through the shame and dishonour of their erroneousness and immorality. After all, decisions and actions "along the line of the least intellectual resistance" run exactly down in the so-called "moral field", and thus it is known in advance that they are "immoral". (This "moral field" is described in item #H2 below this web page, while principles of its interaction with our minds during making our mental decisions are explained, amongst others, in items #C4.2 and #C4.2.1 from my web page named morals.htm, and in "Fig. #I1" and item #J1 from my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.) It is just because people most frequently act along such a "line of the least intellectual resistance", that our civilisation found itself in the present "black hole". After all, the physical world is ruled by the law that everything following the "line of the least resistance" always lands in the deepest hole (e.g. consider water or cosmic "black holes"). In turn, from such a hole it is extremely difficult to come out later. Therefore, the philosophy of totalizm recommends that every decision and every action in the life we should carry out along the direction which is opposite to the "line of the least moral (intellectual) resistance" (i.e. along the direction which lies on the "line of the greatest moral (intellectual) effort"). This is because such decisions lie on the "line of the greatest moral effort" (i.e. lie uphill in the "moral field") - and thus they always are "moral". In turn, by being "moral" they never turn to be erroneous. But the problem depends on the fact, that in typical life situation it is quite difficult to establish what action would lie on the "line of the greatest moral (intellectual) effort". But it always is easy to establish what in a given situation would be the most "immoral action" - i.e. what in a given situation would lie on the so-called "line of the least moral (intellectual) effort". Therefore, instead of a long thinking what we should do to make it the most moral, it is enough to instantly determine what would be the most immoral action in a given situation (and such determining takes only a split of second), and then we should do an exact opposite to this most immoral action. For example, if someone offers a bribe to us, the most immoral action would be to accept this bribe. Therefore we should act opposite to accepting it in a given situation. Similarly, when someone hurts us or offends us, the most immoral would be a revenge. Therefore we should act opposite to a revenge. Etc., etc.
       It is worth to notice, that characteristics of the "moral field" and consequences of our actions "uphill" and "downhill" in that field, are also discussed in a number of other totaliztic web pages, for example in items #B1 to #B8 and #C2 from the web page named pajak_re_2017.htm, in items #J1 and #I1 from the web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm, or in item #F1 of a different web page named rok_uk.htm.


#A2.2. Mischievous inanimate nature, illnesses and problems control most effectively through corrections in own believes:

       For a very vital reason (described e.g. in subsection A16 of monograph [1/5]), God adopted and consequently applies, the principle of interactions with people, which is really worth to learn. This principle is the source of many events which affect practically every person. Namely, it states that every intellect (e.g. every individual person, every community, every scientific discipline, etc.) always receives from God confirmations for beliefs that this intellect is using as a basis for its behaviour or actions. Such confirmations are issued by God to even these intellects which believe in something that actually do NOT exists in the real physical world - only that in such a case God realistically "simulates" what would happen if it existed. According to this principle, people who believe that e.g. some "talisman" brings them good luck, actually gain a good luck from that talisman. For people who believe in some superstition, this superstition actually works. People who believe in indications of radiesthesia, the radiesthesia really helps. People who deeply believe that something is to heal them, God actually heals after taking this something (thus e.g. comes the medical term of "placebo effects"). People who believe in UFOs actually do see UFOs. People who believe in Yeti or in monsters (of the "Nessie" kind) receive confirmations that Yeti or these monsters actually do exist. To people who believe strongly in demons, devils, or ghosts, God shows such demons, devils, or ghosts. People who believe in heaven and hell, actually receive manifestations of the existence of heaven and hell. People who believe in reincarnation, receive confirmations of consequences of reincarnation - consider the example of simulated reincarnation that I experienced and described in item #J1 from the web page malbork_uk.htm. Etc., etc.
       The problem with such strong beliefs depends on the fact, that if someone believes in something that is unpleasant, evil, or detrimental to people, God also manifests it for him or her. Thus, people who strongly believe that they e.g. are to fall ill on something, or that they are to have an accident, in fact experience this illness or that accident - e.g. see item #G1 from the web page healing.htm. In turn to people who strongly believe e.g. in UFOs or in demons, these evil creatures begin to play "unpleasant tricks" - as if they really acted on the Earth and started to pick just on these people. Therefore in all life situations when we are plagued by some sequences of unexplained "mischievous of nature", illnesses, problems, etc., totalizm recommends to most easily and most effectively get rid of these through correcting our believes. If we are able to determine which our belief is the source of given problems, and then we change this belief into a deep belief that our problem results from the principle of God's acting described here, then the problem is to vanish.
       Totalizm recommends, that in order to so correct one's belief, firstly one needs to review of own deep beliefs (which sometimes can be well hidden and almost subconscious). The point is that we need to determine which one amongst our beliefs, if it is supported by God with given evidence, would become the source of our problems. This phase of elimination of our problems is the most difficult, because sometimes the "cause-effect chain" between our belief and our problems can be quite long and complicated. Then one needs to change this particular belief, into the deep belief that such our problems are just consequences of the "simulation" by God of the body of evidence which is to illustrate for us consequences of whatever we believe. For example, instead of deeply believing in the permanent existence of physical UFOnauts - when our almost new car, computer, washing machine, toilet, etc., rapidly are spoiled, we should start to believe that our problems stem from the fact that we believe in UFOs, so in order to illustrate for us what would happen when such evil UFOnauts actually operate on the Earth, good God "simulates" for us "tricks" that such evil UFOnauts would play on us and that would manifest themselves in spoiling our devices that are susceptible to detrimental action of the magnetic field of UFO vehicles.
       As with everything that God does, also the principle described here is to develop in people moral knowledge and wisdom, as well as the fast ability to distinguish truth from false, good from evil, authentic from a fabrication, etc. Therefore, in His "simulations" of manifestations of someone's belief, God additionally imprints the information about a "moral value" of the belief itself. This information is always aligned with the reliable God's principle, which in the ancient language of the Bible is expressed with the words: "a healthy tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit" (see the Bible, Matthew, verse 7:17 - while for the interpretation of this verse see item #C4.7 from the web page named morals.htm). Therefore, beliefs into the correcting of which God persuades us through the "simulation" of detrimental, unpleasant, destructive, etc., manifestations of their consequences, in fact are false, non-authentic, anti-God, anti-human, etc. - while people believing in them should immediately change them into the correct ones, or completely cease believing in them. In other words, from what manifestations of "fruits" of someone's belief return to a given believer, one should recognise whether this belief is true or false, whether it serves for the good of people or is detrimental for the humanity, etc. (As an example consider suffering and disasters that are connected with the "simulations" of "skeletons of dinosaurs" described in item #A1 of the totaliztic web page evolution.htm.)
       This recommendation of totalizm is also disseminated by atheists under the name of "positive thinking". However, in the totaliztic recipe described here it is more effective from the "positive thinking" and it is applicable in the elimination of practically all human problems. After all, it is following the God's intentions, is boils down to enforcing our knowledge about God and our morality, and it also serves to the uplifting of human wisdom, inquisitiveness, life experience, etc.
* * *
       In item #C5.1 from the web page seismograph.htm, I am explaining how I would apply the above method to stop cataclysms that already plague the city of Christchurch in New Zealand. But notice that the method outlined in there applies to all cities and all communities in the world (i.e. it applies to all so-called "group intellects" defined briefly in item #E2 below, while controlled by moral mechanisms explained in items #B2 to #B4.4 of the web page mozajski_uk.htm).


#A2.3. From catastrophes and from extremes of nature defend yourself and your loved ones by surrounding yourself with a group of at least "10 righteous":

       Starting from around 1992, due to "contributions" of our well-paid science, the humanity is openly in the "state of war with its God" - for more details see descriptions from item #K1 and "Tab. #K1" of my web page named tapanui.htm. The continuation of the present blind belief of people in erroneous claims of "atheistic orthodox science" additionally escalates this our open "war with God", instead of easing it down. In the result, everyone amongst us should be prepared, that the present cataclysms, catastrophes, extremes of weather and nature, etc., will be intensified as time elapses. So it is worth to begin to listen to the guidelines of totalizm as how to defend oneself from all these.
       Totalizm recommends, that the best defence against cataclysms, catastrophes, extremes of weather and nature, etc., resorted in "crisis situations" when these disasters already trouble us and hang above our heads, depends on surrounding ourselves with a group of at least 10 people who fulfil the definition of so-called "righteous" - means people defined more precisely in item #I1 from my web page quake.htm, which live precisely according to either what in the ancient language recommends to us the Bible, or what with the modern language (and present examples) recommends the philosophy of totalizm. (Notice that the philosophy of totalizm actually is a "generator of righteous people". This is because people who practice the so-called "formal totalizm" described below in item #C1, in reality also fulfil the highly demanding definition of "righteous" from the Bible.) This method of defence results from the fact that God granted a guarantee in the Bible, that these communities in the midst of which lives at least 10 highly moral persons that fulfil the demanding definition of "righteous", are protected from consequences of any cataclysms. This God's guarantee is recorded in the Biblical "Book of Genesis, verses 18:23-32. In turn the actual keeping this guarantee in real life and in present times, I checked in person on the township of Petone in New Zealand (in which I live), while I documented it in item #I3 of two web pages named petone.htm and day26.htm. In fact, this Petone, in the vicinity of which live such "10 righteous" with highly totaliztic morality, is omitted by all cataclysms which lately almost continually trouble New Zealand. (Some amongst these cataclysms are described, amongst others, in item #C5 of the web page named seismograph.htm, in item #D5 of the web page named fruit.htm, and also in item #N1 of the web page named solar.htm.)
       Unfortunately, NOT in every place of living one can surround himself or herself with these at least "10 righteous" - for a simple reason, that there is increasingly less of them on Earth. So if such people are lacking in the place of our living, nor we are able to convince 9 amongst our friends to join us - so that together we would form such a group of "10 righteous" that would pedantically practice the philosophy of "formal totalizm", while the place of our living is already endangered by deadly cataclysms, then perhaps we should consider either shifting to a different area, or "importing" the lacking "righteous" from elsewhere. In turn, if such a shifting or "importing" is out of question, then still we can defend ourselves by practicing totalizm just on our own. After all, even if our lone practice of totalizm does NOT defend from a cataclysm the community amongst which we live, it still for sure is to defend just us. This is because even when our possessions will need to be destroyed by the cataclysm send by God, still - because of our pedantic practicing of totalizm we ourselves for sure become somehow spared, or saved.
* * *
       In item #I3.1 from the web page day26.htm is explained, that the "gift" of such "10 righteous" to protect against cataclysms the area in which they live, can probably be "projected" onto a single selected "righteous" person. Unfortunately, I do not have the required research funds to verify experimentally such a possibility.


#A2.4. If you are "pushed against a wall" or "cornered", then seek the hidden "doors of exit from the situation" that God prepared in there especially for you:

       All inhabitants of the physical world, even those ones who behave most morally, occasionally God subjects to periodic exams, tests, checks, etc. - for details see item #A1.1 above on this web page. These are aimed at teaching us the awareness and perseverance, and simultaneously at testing what each one of us is capable of, how his or her skills compare to skills of other people, etc. These God's exams, tests, checks, etc., sometimes may even depends on the proverbial "pushing us against a wall" or on "cornering" us. But they are to test us, not to destroy us. Therefore, always before creating the situation which is to "push us against a wall" or to "corner us", God firstly prepares especially for us in this wall or in this corner a well-hidden "door" which allows that these moral ones amongst us can escape from the situation without any harm. Thus, the main our task is to find this "door" in even the most difficult situations, and then to use it for our advantage. Therefore, totalizm recommends that if you know that in life you mainly act morally, then after finding yourself in the situation which appears to have no exist, you shouldn't ever give up, but always find this "exit door" which God prepared long in advance especially for you.
       The existence of such "exit doors" in every situation, even that most hopelessly looking, is confirmed by folk wisdom, e.g. through proverbs of the kind like the Polish "when God shuts the door, he always leaves open a small window". The fact that such an "exist door" God always prepares for us in every difficult situation is also emphasized in the Bible, e.g. with the example of the famous escape of Jews from Egyptians through the Red Sea. Just because of this biblical escape, the totaliztic principle described here stating that "we never should give up and always seek this hidden 'exit door' from a given situation", in my descriptions from #6A in subsection I4.1.1 of volume 5 in monograph [1/5], I call this principle the "law of a highway through a sea".


#A2.5. In your adult life be careful to NOT sabotage the plans and intentions of God, because your adult behaviour decides about what was happening to you in the young age:

       Totalizm teaches, that what affects people in young age is actually shaped by what these people are doing in their adult age. Of course, NOT every person has the intellect capable of understanding that whatever they do as adults, in fact decides about what happened to them as children or teenagers. After all, people think in chronological categories. Thus everything that is earlier in time they consider to be a cause, while everything that happens later they consider to be an effect. However, God sees all times at once. After all, God intentionally created the "reversible software time" described in item #C4 from the web page named immortality.htm and in the introduction and item #G4 from the web page named dipolar_gravity.htm - so that He is able to always see not only the presence and past, but also the future. So everything that people do at any time and that introduces vital consequences for other people, for God becomes a cause, while the effect (that represents the reaction of God on this cause) God implements in the moment of time which from the God's prospective is the most adequate - frequently a long time before the elapse of the software human time arrives to the cause of that particular reaction of God. Therefore people whose intellects are unable to understand this capability of God, that effects of someone's actions are served sometimes much earlier than causes do occur, can only feel in their lives a kind of "supervision" or "care". Means, they only notice, that their lives in young age were like intentionally by someone controlled, so that in the adult age they could accomplish or do whatever they did. But in reality the situation is completely reversed. Namely, in reality God first checks what a given person is going to do in the entire its life, and only then God so directs the life of that person, that this doing agrees with plans and intentions of God. This is the reason for which we all should watch whether we do as adults only things that are agreeable with recommendations, plans, and methods of God (revealed to us by the Bible and philosophy of totalizm), because whatever we do as adults is to decide what happened to us in the young age.
       The full understanding of the above recommendation of totalizm requires the explanation "why" God acts like this. Unfortunately, it so happens that the explanation "why" is quite complex and exceeds the size of this web page. But it is described in other my publications. Therefore, for this explanation I recommend to look in additional sources which I am indicating here. To these sources belong, amongst others, the second part of the descriptions from the web page god_exists.htm, and also item #F1 from the web page rok_uk.htm. Furthermore, more extensive explanations on the topic of dependence of what happens to us in a young age from what we do in the adult age, are provided in subsections NG5.7, NG5.6 and A16 from my newest monograph [1/5].


#A2.6. For true knowledge - research God and extrapolate your findings to the world around, for the impression of knowledge - research world around you and extrapolate it to God:

Motto: "The one-sided monopole of the 'atheistic orthodox science' to-date, makes the humanity poorer, divided, senseless and gloomy to the level which we see today around us. So it is about the time to restore the richness, harmony, sense and excitement of living on the Earth, by abolishing this monopole with the competitive development of new 'totaliztic science'."

       The empirical life continually confirms to us, that "passing the same path, but in both opposite directions, always is the source of two different sets of knowledge which mutually complement each other". For example, if we stand on the top of a mountain, while our eyes catch images (light) arriving from the bottom of it, then our view is different than when we stand on the bottom of this mountain while our eyes catch the view (light) arriving from the top of it. But only the thorough watch in both these directions provides us with a full understanding of the entire situation with that mountain. Similarly, if we look at the landscape through one end of a telescope or binoculars, then whatever we see is to differ drastically from what we are to find out when looking at the same landscape through the opposite end of the same telescope or binoculars. But only combining together our findings from both these directions of looking, provides us with a full and balanced knowledge of work of these instruments. The same happens even if we e.g. just walk or drive "to", and then "from" a place - our road in both directions also provides us with a different knowledge, in spite that it is passing through exactly the same trajectory (e.g. the road "from" always subjectively "feels" as "shorter" and as if we pass it "faster" than the road "to", also during the road "from" we capture additional details of the "other side" which we missed during the road "to"). At outlets of some rivers tourists and locals are entertained by extraordinarily condensed "super-waves" that run "against the current", means "from the sea" - as this is described in item #D2 of the web page named dipolar_gravity.htm. But only seeing also the unusual "extended" waves that run "with the flow" on fast rivers, reveal to us that these "super-waves" are outcomes of collision between the motion of wave and motion of water - and that this collision causes their "condensing". Similarly, seeing the so-called "red shift" in the light of stars that is "condensed" due to run "against the gravity current" of heavy stars, only induces wild speculations of some under-educated scientists regarding "where this red colour of light comes from". Only seeing also the "blue shift" in the light coming from the blue sky and "extended" by motion "with the gravity current" of the Earth, reveals to some rational thinking people that "the gravity is a dynamic dipolar field" similar to a field formed by the air at the entry to a fan. To summarise the above, if one wants to gain a full and balanced knowledge about consequences of a given "pathway", then it is necessary to experience this pathway in both directions.
       In spite of these empirical findings that "only travelling in both directions provides us with the full and balanced knowledge", in every matter people insist on going in only one direction. As an example of that insisting, let us consider the "road to God". In medieval times, the religion looked at everything by "starting from God and extrapolating this onto the surrounding reality", while it "burned on stake" every person which tried to accumulate an atheistic knowledge. In turn present-day "atheistic science" does opposite, namely "looks at everything starting from the surrounding reality and extrapolating this onto God", while it "burns on the stake" everyone who (like my "totaliztic science") tries to show the world from the prospective of God. Unfortunately, due to limiting its investigations to just this one approach, the science to-date arrives to the erroneous conclusion that "God does NOT exist". However, the empiric experience reveals to us, that in order to gain the "complete and balanced knowledge" it is necessary to learn about the surrounding reality (and about God), by passing the "road to knowledge" in both these directions, i.e. by "placing ourselves in the situation of God and extrapolating our analyses at the surrounding reality" as well as by "atheistic researching the reality which surrounds us and extrapolation our findings onto God". In this way, these two approaches mutually are to check and to complement each other. In order to realise here the benefits open for us due to such "two-directional" approach, let us briefly compare accomplishments of the monopole of the atheistic orthodox science to-date - means present official human science which "researches only the surrounding reality while the results tries to extrapolate onto God", with the rich competitiveness of the newly born totaliztic science - means the new science which is based on the philosophy of totalizm, and which "analyses everything after placing itself in the position of God and extrapolating God's prospective onto the surrounding reality". (For definitions and more detailed descriptions of both these sciences with opposite philosophical foundations, see items #C1 to #C6 from the abovementioned web page telekinetics.htm.)
       As I am documenting this with countless evidence in a whole range of totaliztic publications, for example in item #B1 from the web page named changelings.htm, or in subsection H10 from volume 4 of my newest monograph [1/5], such "world ruled by God" that results from research of the "totaliztic science" must drastically differ from the "world without God" that stems from the research of the "atheistic orthodox science". For example, in the "world without God" finding "bones of dinosaurs" must mean that dinosaurs in fact lived on the Earth. In turn in the "world governed by God" finding "bones of dinosaurs" means only that God has some superior goal in showing these bones to people - as this is described in items #A1 and #E1 of the web page named evolution.htm. Thus God could "create" these "bones of dinosaurs" in the same way as He created people and created animals - in spite that dinosaurs did NOT need to live on the Earth. In a similar way in the "world without God" there is no place for "morality" nor "dreams", nor even for the "higher feelings" like love, pity, sorrow, etc. In other words, in order the humanity accomplished the balanced picture of the universe, reality must be simultaneously researched and interpreted by two competitive sciences, namely by the to-date "atheistic orthodox science" and by the "totaliztic science" which is just being established by the philosophy of totalizm. In turn results of both these sciences should be taught simultaneously in schools and officially disseminated amongst people - as this is emphasized, amongst others, in items #B1 and #G1 from my web page named pajak_re_2017.htm. This is because without such a parallel learning from both these "roads to knowledge", the picture of the universe is highly "biased", deviated, and poor.
       As I already explained it at the beginning of this item, the competitive approach of the new "totaliztic science" is NOT entirely new in every its aspect. After all, it represents the approach to research of the reality, which by past philosophers was called a priori - means "from cause to effect". In a highly limited edition it was practiced in past by religions, while in the ancient times it was even used by Jewish scholars - who preserve the essence of it until today in the form of "kabala". But the "totaliztic science" introduces several new (highly creative) components to this old approach. For example, it states that the use in scientific research exclusively one approach, i.e. the use exclusively either "a priori" approach, or exclusively "a posteriori" approach (i.e. the one which climbs "from effect to cause" - means the one which is exclusively used by present "atheistic orthodox science") is a serious epistemological error which leads to deviations in the human knowledge. This is because, in order the knowledge is complete and balanced, it is necessary to use both these approaches simultaneously. In other words, in vital interest of the humanity lies the establishing and running on the Earth as many as two competitive sciences simultaneously, i.e. the continuation of to-date "atheistic orthodox science" with its exclusively "a posteriori" approach to research, and the simultaneous establishing and running a new "totaliztic science" which would be based on the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and on the formal scientific proof for the existence of God - thus which would scientifically develop the "a priori" approach to the same research - as this "a priori" approach is represented and illustrated already now in my publications, e.g. in my newest monograph [1/5]. Of course, many more such new and highly creative elements were introduced to the "totaliztic science" - only that their full description (and illustration on examples) requires rather voluminous publication, such as my newest monograph [1/5].
       Sadly, the monopole of "atheistic orthodox science" is surely going to disallow for a long time to come, both - the official establishing and financing of the "totaliztic science", as well as the official dissemination of findings of that "totaliztic science". After all, the "atheistic orthodox science", similarly like every other monopolistic institution, gains significant financial benefits and complacent life due to its "monopole on knowledge" - which benefits it does NOT want to share voluntarily with anyone, while which complacent life it does NOT want to loose by creating a competition. Thus, for a long time to come the totaliztic researchers, similarly like Dr Jan Pająk - the author of this web page, will be forced to research the universe as "unemployed scientists", and perhaps some of them will be even skilfully deprived the right for an "unemployment benefit" - thus experiencing another manifestation of the "curse of inventors" described in item #B4.4 of the web page named mozajski_uk.htm. Because of this obstructing the free and official disclosure of the findings of the "totaliztic science", to balance own knowledge every person should try to learn these findings in his or her private capacity. After all, when starting from the point of view that God exists, and being aware of the method of God described in item #A2.2 above, rapidly the world around us begins to look differently. For example, everything that surrounds us begins to be just a kind of "hologram" formed by God to accomplish His superior goals - e.g. to inspire people for creative searches and to improve "morality". Thus, for example looking at "skeletons of dinosaurs" we start to know that these skeletons do NOT mean at all that dinosaurs actually lived on the Earth - but only mean that God wishes to inspire human creative searchers by "fabricating" them. Similarly, e.g. the so-called "red shift of lights from stars" and "expansion of the universe", do NOT certify at all for the "big bang", but certify for the high complexity and refinement of the laws of nature which God encoded into the software of the universe - as this is explained in item #D2 of the web page named dipolar_gravity.htm. In turn, when we realise all these, our lives again become enriched with the deep sense of purpose and with the understanding of direction - both of which the humanity lost recently because of the "biased" deformation of the knowledge due to the complacent "monopole" of the present "atheistic orthodox science".
       The topic of urgent need for establishing the "totaliztic science" is extended in items #C1 to #C6 from the web page telekinetics.htm and in item #B1 from the web page tornado.htm.


#A2.7. Beware of "principle of the survival of most moral" (which can also be called "principle of the extinction of most immoral intellects"), which God consistently, although discreetly, implements on people:

Motto: "If we would determine the most primary cause for each premature death, then it turns out that it is the deafness to voice of own conscience (i.e. practicing of a form of immorality)."

       No matter whether you are an individual person, or just a whole institution (i.e. so-called "group intellect"), the philosophy of totalizm has for you a vital advice. Namely, if you wish to protect yourself (and also your close ones) from a premature death, then you listen to the voice of your conscience, and also teach your children and all people close to you how to listen to the voice of their conscience. Do so, because for the majority of so-called "intellects" (i.e. for the majority of everything that leads independent "life" and has conscience), God consistently implements the principle of the "survival of most moral" described in more details, amongst others, in item #B1 of the web page named changelings.htm and in items #G1, #G3 and #G4 of the web page named will.htm. The work of this principle is such, that almost all "intellects" which become deaf to the voice of their conscience die prematurely. But it shocks how many present people is unable to listen to the voice of their conscience. Almost all of them are designated "for the scythe" - it is just a matter of time how soon this happen to them. In turn, if you wish to test an adult whether he or she listens to the voice of conscience, then you should utilise for this purpose consequences of the "unanimity rule" described in more details in subsections JA2.1, JA9 and JA13 from volume 6 of my newest monograph [1/5] (or use the child test, also based on this rule, and described in caption under "Fig. #G1b (right)" from the web page named cielcza_uk.htm). This rule states, that "independently with which moral criterion one would judge or measure a given human behaviour, the outcome always will be the same". Therefore, if the reader finds e.g. in the Bible any definite judgement of some human behaviour, then the exact equivalent of this judgement will be whispered by the voice of conscience to all people who still listen to their consciences. Thus, if to a person that still is used to listen to the voice of own conscience, someone suggests e.g. to think or to imagine a sexual intercourse between homosexuals, then the conscience of such a person is to generate a feeling that corresponds to the God's command expressed e.g. in the Biblical "Leviticus", verse 18:22 - quote: "And you must not lie down with a male the same as you lie down with a woman. It is a detestable thing." It is just for this reason, that the majority of people used to listen to voice of their conscience are unable to eat meals e.g. in restaurants in which homosexuals e.g. are openly kissing each other - as this is described in item #B4 from the web page antichrist.htm. But in people who become deaf to voices of their conscience, a sight of active homosexuals either does NOT induce any feelings, or induces the same feelings as a sight of kissing boys and girls. In turn, if to a person used to listen to the voice of own conscience, someone suggests e.g. the "murder", then the conscience of that person is going to induce in him or her a feeling that is an equivalent to the definitive command from God documented e.g. in the Biblical "Exodus", verse 20:13 - quote: "You must not murder". (Notice that both above verses are quoted from the "New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures", Watch Tower Bible, New York 1984. The reason is, that in some other translations of the Bible, these verses may NOT be translated so exactly. For example, in Biblical times the same word "kill" was used both, for describing a killing of animals and for a human murder. But in abovementioned verse 20:13 this word is used to describe murdering of people. After all, God allows killing animals if the goal of this killing is a justified use of their flesh for satisfying a true human hunger.)
       The principle of the "survival of most moral" (which can also be named the principle of "premature extinction of most immoral intellects") stems directly from the goal for which God created people and for which at present God wisely governs over the humanity. This is because the God's goal is the "pursue of knowledge" - as this is explained in items #B1 and #B2 of the web page named antichrist.htm. It is also for the same goal that God was forced to create people as imperfect as only possible without causing a self-destruction of the humanity. But, unfortunately, in order to be able to "pursue knowledge" people must behave in a specific manner which in present times is named with the term "moral" behaviour. After all, without a moral behaviour there is NO progress of knowledge nor technology - as this is emphasized in item #A1 of this web page. Therefore God issued to people in authorised (inspired) by Him holy books (e.g. in the Bible) the list of moral requirements and commandments which all humans must obey in their lives. In addition, to every person God gave also a special sense organ called conscience which links directly the mind of that person with the mind of God and which discreetly tells every person which behaviours are morally correct, and which are morally incorrect. In turn, for the use of e.g. atheists, wise God developed also a whole array of objective so-called "indicators of moral correctness" - such as "moral field", "moral energy", "moral laws", "karma", etc. (for their brief descriptions see items #C4.2 to #C4.7 from the web page morals.htm). Unfortunately, because of the in-born imperfection, many people ignore these commandments from holy books, whispers of conscience, indicators of moral correctness, etc. Due to this, instead of behaving morally, they behave immorally. In turn, such their immoral behaviour holds back God in accomplishing His goals and plans. Therefore, God discreetly eliminates these immoral intellects from the life (i.e. quietly kills them) - as this is explained in items #G1, #G3 and #G4 from the web page named will.htm and item #B1 from the web page named changelings.htm. This string of premature deaths of such immoral intellects (and thus survivals of only most moral ones) forms the principle of the "survival of most moral" summarised in this item. (For a complete description of this principle I would recommend to look at items #G1 to #G7 from the web page named will.htm.)
       However, God's actions during the implementation of this principle of the "survival of most moral" (and "extinction of the most immoral"), are obstructed by a serious limitation. This limitation stems from the fact, that if every person is sure of the consistent work of this principle in real life, then rapidly all people would start to blindly believe in God and there would be NO atheists on the Earth. On the other hand, people who blindly believe in God and are highly religious, have a serious drawback, which can be called the "paradox of believers". Namely, typically they think, that they already know everything that is worth knowing - thus they ignore their duty to learn increasingly more about their God and about the world which God created. This in turn changes them into conservatives and stagnation-makers. So not only that they do NOT "pursue of knowledge", but even they actively disrupt the pursue of knowledge - as this is explained in more details in items #C3 and #A2 from the web page named will.htm. In fact, if the Earth is inhabited exclusively by people blindly believing in God, then until today the humanity probably would still live in caves and know no fire. In addition, almost all religions (and thus almost all religious people who blindly believe in God) with the elapse of time gradually deviated the understanding of God's commandments, interpreting these commandments increasingly wrong and selectively. For example, the greatest parts of holy books with God's commandments (e.g. the greatest part of the Bible) express God's requirements how people should coexist morally with other people. In turn only a marginal part of these holy books is devoted to maintenance of tradition of repetitive reminding to people about the existence of God - through e.g. communal prayers and masses, explanation of God's powers, pay homage to God, worshiping God, etc. However, almost all religions reversed these proportions and the majority of their attention they devote to worshiping God and prising God, while only a marginal part of attention they devote to the moral coexistence between people. As the result, the majority of religious people who blindly believe in God, thinks that they fulfil all God's requirements imposed onto them if they only regularly go to church or temple and participate in there in sessions of worshiping God and prising God. In turn fulfilment of these most vital for God requirements of everyday moral coexistence with other people, these blindly believing people neglect or ignore completely. So instead of living morally, the majority of religious people only regularly praise God, while their everyday lives typically are full of immoralities. Summarising the above, because of the progressing with time departure by religions from the understanding of God's intentions passed to people in His requirements and commandments, highly religious people who blindly believe in God actually make impossible for God the implementation of the goal for which He created people, i.e. make impossible the "pursue of knowledge". So for the "pursue of knowledge", God needs atheists on the Earth (or needs the presence of people who practice the new "totaliztic science" - and thus who know that the God’s goal is the "pursue of knowledge", and thus they still "pursue of knowledge" in spite that they are sure of the God's existence). Therefore, God cannot openly and in a visible to everyone manner "kill those most immoral intellects". This is because such an open killing would deprive people of their "free will" and would cause that everyone would be scared to ask inquisitive questions which lie at foundations of the "pursue of knowledge". After all, people who ask courageous questions frequently are accused of "blasphemy" by various "Pharisees" - it is in order to disclose the immorality of this type of accusations that are against God's will and goals, that Jesus was send to cross by priests who almost everything were ready to call "blasphemy".
       In order to balance the situation and cause that both, immoral intellects get extinct, but atheists still are propelling the "pursue of knowledge", wise God implements on the Earth the principle of the "survival of most moral" in a highly discreet, unspectacular, and unnoticeable for people manner - as this is explained in items #G3 to #G5 from the abovementioned web page will.htm. Namely, God creates appearances, that also for people supposedly acts the Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest" and that supposedly "pays to be immoral", and furthermore, when God consistently "kills these most immoral", He always does it in a manner which provides people with at least 3 different explanations - described more exactly in item #C2 from the web page tornado.htm. In turn, for the use of these persons, which work (and deserve) to learn the truth on this subject, God allows this truth to be discovered, and revealed to interested people, by someone named Jan Pająk - means by a truth-chaser with the professional life quite symbolic for the turn of 20th to 21st century, i.e. restlessly persecuted by his countrymen, unwanted in his own country, chased to the "end of world", continually criticised by professional scientists, characterised by almost everything that induces prejudices of other people (including name), troubled by frequent losses of work, by uncertainty of tomorrow, by unemployment (but without qualifying for an unemployment benefit), lack of funds for research, scarce resources, coldness, health problems, etc. This is because the wise God knows very well, that anyway, almost no-one in the world will believe in truths which were discovered privately and for free by the hobbyist named Jan Pająk that originates from the small Polish village Wszewilki (instead of being discovered at huge costs and with the use of expensive satellites or research facilities by a scientific celebrity employed officially in Cambridge or in MIT just for specialising in such research).


#A2.8. If you notice a "group immorality" of the institution or community to which you belong, do wisely everything in your power (but without compromising your security), to disclose the harmfulness of it, as the passivity towards someone's immorality, God punishes the same severely as a participation in this immorality:

Motto: "If you remain 'passive' in the face of someone's immorality, then in the future you will be punished in the same way as if you were a co-culprit in that immorality."

       Empirical data that increasingly reveal themselves in events that we see, show that a "passivity" towards someone's immorality God punishes as severely as the participation in that immorality. That principle of punishing a passivity is described already in a number of totaliztic web pages - e.g. see items #B4 and #B1 from the web page named parasitism.htm. Therefore, if we see any form of immorality in the group intellect to which we belong, then in our interest lies that we wisely do everything in our power, but in such a way that it will not expose us to a danger or to a persecution, to disclose the harmfulness of this immorality and in this way to make our own contribution to the elimination of it.
       In our, however, observance of that requirement of God (to not remain passive in face of someone's immorality), we have an obligation to take only such actions which, according to our conscience and to our knowledge, do NOT represent an "aggression", and hence do NOT expose us to the danger or to persecution from other people with whom we previously lived in peace. The point is, that God does NOT wish we combat one evil with the help of another evil. However, if we are first who took (initiate) an action against people with which previously we lived in peace, while a consequence of this action would be that it would expose us to a revenge, persecution, danger, etc., from these people, then even if our action would be used to curb someone's immorality, still it would represent itself an "aggression", and as such it would be an immoral action. Hence such a prevention of someone's "malicious" activities through the initiation of harming ourselves, is not at all what the wise and righteous God demands from us. For this reason, by "doing everything in our power" to prevent someone's immorality, one should understand the making of prudent and well thought-over actions, which do NOT represent an "aggression", and hence they do NOT expose us to any form of receiving returned suffering, persecution, dangers, etc. (Please notice, however, that if this "group immorality" that we have the duty to combat, is already itself an aggression directed against us, then the situation changes and we have then an "obligation to defend ourselves" with the aid of all ways and means that are available to us.) In other words, from experiencing the full weight of the punishment from God for our passivity towards someone's immorality, we will be exempted already after taking any our prudent and well thought-over deliberate actions, that at least in a minimal way contribute to the reduction of the "immorality" of someone's conduct (e.g. through making other people aware of the harmfulness of such a conduct). Of course, when God will serve penalty for immortality of a given "group intellect" to which we belong, then the level of our release from suffering because of that penalty, will be proportional to how much we contributed to eradication of given "group immorality". The most clearly this "proportionality" of the level of punishment can be seen in cataclysms - e.g. see items #C7 and #I1 on the web page named seismograph.htm. This is because cataclysms always bring death only to those most guilty, they bring rough treatment to those slightly less guilty or those who did not display a full passiveness, and they completely bypass the innocent ones and those who significantly contributed to the elimination of the "group immorality".
       To the matter of our personal responsibility for immoral actions of the group intellect to which we belong, and also of the moral requirement imposed on us, that in such cases we must NOT remain passive, but should start an active effort to correct this immorality, the philosophy of totalizm devotes a lot of attention. For example, this topic is addressed also in item #E2 from this web page, as well as in item #N2 from the web page named pajak_re_2017.htm. In turn an example of the punishment which was served to Germans for passivity in the matter of immoralities committed by their group intellect, which punishment after the end of second world's war, amongst others, took the form of killings of former (passive) Germans by the secret organisation of Germans, is discussed in item #E2 from the web page named wszewilki_uk.htm.


#A2.9. To those whom you love and respect tell the objective truth and well-balanced constructive criticism, while praises and unconstructive compliments keep for the enemies:

Motto: "Those who receive only compliments are deprived of chances to repair their mistakes."

       Speaking the truth and constructive criticism is difficult. After all, it climbs steeply uphill in the "moral field" - as explained in item #A2 from the web page named prawda_uk.htm. Thus the "truth" almost always turns out to be unpleasant. Therefore, in recent times the humanity adopted an immensely damaging principle, that to the people close to us only said is whatever they want to hear, means sweet lies, praises, compliments, etc. This rampant lately "fashion" or a rule to never tell the truth, on the West already has the name of "positive reinforcement" - means supposedly the "building of a character through telling only things believed to be 'positive' ". However, as it turns out, the consequences of it actually "undermine", not "enhance" or "reinforce". As a result of this ocean of "sweet lies", the majority of people today have lost their self-criticism, as well as their ability to understand and to repair of errors that they committed. Therefore, no longer they are able to improve their behaviour. After all, by not receiving the information from other people as to what they are doing wrong, they lost the realism in the assessment of own conduct, and therefore act increasingly more wrong.
       For the above reasons totalizm points out that the more you love and respect someone, the greater is the obligation to speak truth to him or her and to positively identify errors that this someone commits. After all - as it is explained in item #F1 from this web page, "without learning the truth there is no progress". But if the loving person does not explain exactly to the loved and respected ones, what they do wrong and what mistakes they made, then in today's times they do not receive such an information from anyone else.
       In imposing on the totalizts the obligation to criticise constructively and to objectively indicate someone's errors, totalizm, however, requires to do it the right way. Namely, it requires that (a) the criticized people are always informed that our criticism results from the love and respect to them, and that we want that through such a criticism they learned to avoid making mistakes and mastered the skill of repairing these errors which they already committed. In addition, (b) the criticism must be constructive. This means, that it should be accompanied by so much additional information as much we are able to communicate. Especially it should reply to questions "why" something was wrong, "how it can be repaired", "how in the future one can avoid the repetition of the same error", etc. Our criticism should also be (c), well-balanced. That is, the serving of it, if possible, should be balanced by the equal amount of confirming what those of our loved and respected ones do well and properly.
       Totalizts typically "do not get into anyone's way", and thus they do not have a lot of enemies. After all, in their lives they always act pedantically moral. However, if they do have an enemy, then they should keep for him or her all the compliments and unconstructive praising. After all, in this way they "hunt up several birds with just a single stone."


#A2.10. Rise your children accordingly to the "principle of reversals" commanded us by God, remember also that the entire your life God continues upbringing you with the use of this principle:

Motto: "Experiencing opposite of good, illustratively teaches us what is good."

       On a number of totaliztic web pages is described the principle used by God for upbringing people, called the "principle of reversals". Descriptions of it the reader finds in item #B1.1 from the web page antichrist.htm, in item #B5.1 from the web page named will.htm, or in item #F3 from the totaliztic web page wszewilki_uk.htm. In the Bible this principle is commanded by God to be used by people for upbringing their children - although in there it does NOT have so meaningful name. The work of this principle boils down to the mobilizing people to intensely work towards a change of their situation, through placing them in the situation, that what "is", always seems to be "opposite" to what "should be", what "we would like to be", and what "God requires us to establish". In other words, in order to teach people a resourcefulness, place them in situation of unavailability, to teach people softness, act on them hard, etc.
       The fact, that for the entire our lives God continually is upbringing us with the use of this "principle of reversals", introduces various consequences to the perception of whatever affects us. For example, if we are affected with something unpleasant, then instead of being miserable, we should treat our experience as a lesson of life from which we can draw useful conclusions, and as an opportunity to improve our character and our prospects for the future. We also should NOT be ashamed of our "black periods" from our lives, as they document the richness of experiences that we already gathered.
* * *
       In order to consistently implement this "principle of reversals" on the Earth, God is forced to use an array of tools, methods, and ways of acting especially created or developed for this purpose. I personally would recommend to the reader to get familiar with them. Their more comprehensive description is provided in item #C6 from the web page named god_exists.htm. Some of these are also indicated in item #A1.1 above on this web page. After all, knowing them allows us to understand better the behaviour of our God, and also to react better in unpleasant life situations in which frequently we find ourselves just because of this God's "principle of reversals".


#A2.11. Because every elementary action generates both good and bad consequences, to each of your more vital matter assign at least two different actions at the same time, which you choose so skilfully, that their "bad" effects will compensate each other:

Motto: "If instead of a force that always induces resistance, or instead of money that stimulate lusts, you use your intelligence and the described here knowledge about such merging together mechanisms that they mutually compensate their bad consequences, then even the most difficult among troubling you problems, with the help of God can be solved without generating effects that are undesirable e.g. for yourself."

       Everyone probably knows the old Polish saying, which expresses the timeless truth, namely that "there is no such bad that would NOT generate also some sort of good". After all, this wise saying was copied from Polish people by practically all the other nations, so that in some way almost everyone come across it on some occasion. However, not everyone knows yet, that this saying has also the reversed version which equally well works in real life, and which I have already described on a number of my web pages and publications (e.g. see item #F3 on my web page named wszewilki_uk.htm, or see item #B3 on my other web page named pajak_re_2017.htm). This reversed version affirms a completely opposite truth, namely that "There is no such good that would NOT generate some sort of evil". The perfect example of the action of this opposite truth are consequences of the "good" served when raising children from wealthy homes, or from homes ruled by women - that is, children brought up "without a father" - to which consequences I try to draw the attention of the reader in a number of my web pages (for examples see item #A3 on the web page named god_proof.htm, or item #B4 on the web page antichrist.htm, or even partially item #A2.10 from this web page). In turn the empirical confirmation of the reliable work of both these opposing truths in our physical world, provides e.g. the fact, that absolutely nothing has only advantages, but practically everything has both, advantages and disadvantages, and also provides the work of so-called "moral field", the discovery of which was only possible after the formulation of the philosophy of totalizm (i.e. provides the work of "moral field", which on this web page briefly described in items #H2, #B1 and #A1.1, while more thoroughly which is discussed e.g. in tem #C4.2 from another web page named morals.htm). Also, thanks to totalizm, I have been able to discover, define, and descriptively formulate a moral recommendation explaining "how" we should proceed in our lives in the situation of the simultaneous existence and action of both of these truths, so that we do NOT generate unnecessary evil. This item describes my recommendation, which I hereby include in the collection of life-improving recommendations of my philosophy of totalizm.
       The recommendation which I intend to describe here, I intuitively use since the beginning of my research and creative activity. After all, numerous technical implementations of various mechanisms that compensate undesired consequences, as a small boy I was analyzing in precise Swiss clocks that my father used to repair, while I used to take apart again when my father was at work. (I write more about this my youthful behaviour in item #B1 from my autobiographical web page named pajak_jan_uk.htm.) For example, it was just because of my intuitive use of the principle from this recommendation, that I successfully designed my invincible starship called the "Magnocraft" - i.e. that I successfully designed my invention of the interstellar spaceship, which the reader will find described and perfectly illustrated starting from "Fig. #A2" of my web page named magnocraft.htm. The designing problem that needed to be solved in this Magnocraft is arising because for the propelling purposes this starship uses extremely powerful magnets, called Oscillatory Chambers. In turn each of these Oscillatory Chambers NOT only that is capable to generate the desired propelling forces (i.e. to generate "good") that propel this interstellar spaceship to near-light velocity, but is also generates unwanted effects (i.e. generates "bad" consequences), due to e.g. attracting (or repelling) with enormous forces of any other Oscillatory Chambers, as well as any nearby ferromagnetic objects. In order to eliminate these "bad" effects, instead of using just one Oscillatory Chamber, for propelling of the Magnocraft "n+1" of such Oscillatory Chambers are used, and in addition each of them produces a pulsating magnetic field with a special course of its changes over time. As a result of this, the mutual attraction of the Oscillatory Chambers occurring between one main propulsor and "n" side propulsors of the Magnocraft, is neutralized by the mutual repulsion between each other of these "n" circularly positioned side propulsors. On the other hand, the attraction of ferromagnetic objects through all these Oscillatory Chambers is neutralized by the repulsion of these objects by pulsations of the magnetic field. (Note from physics, that the pulsating magnetic field repels ferromagnetic objects, instead of attracting them.) The use of exactly the same principle of neutralizing undesirable effects allowed me also to invent a device that would generate a magnetic field of an unlimited-power - i.e. to invent that Oscillatory Chamber described in more details on the web page named oscillatory_chamber.htm. After all, the electromagnets so-far invented by humans, for the generating magnetic fields use the flow of current in their coils of electrical conductor. However, this principle introduces a very bad consequence in the form of the bursting force that the generated magnetic field exerts on the coils of own conductor. As a result of this bursting force, the magnetic field strength of the existing electromagnets could not rise above a certain value (which turns out to be rather low), because these bursting forces are able to cause a tearing and a destructive exploding of electromagnets' coils. In contrast, in the Oscillatory Chamber of my invention, these bursting forces are neutralized by the forces of attraction that compress the chambers in an opposite direction due to the mutual attraction of the electrical charges accumulated on the opposing walls of these chambers. Similar intuitive use of the principle discussed here has also allowed me to eliminate the problems (bad consequences) of several other my inventions. Unfortunately, my previous use of this principle was done in a completely intuitive way, without being aware that it is a kind of essential law governing over our entire physical world.
       It was only when in January 2017 I formulated the content of item #C9.1 from my web page named ufo_proof.htm, that I suddenly realized that the recommendation I am trying to describe here is actually a kind of essential law prevailing in the entire our physical world, which (the law) is even respected by God Himself in almost everything that God does. Hence, the first formulation of this new recommendation of totalizm I was firstly quoting as the "motto" for item #C9.1 from my web page named "ufo_proof.htm". At that item I also provided a large collection of examples of the use of that recommendation. However, after further identification and rethinking as to how extensive and useful are applications of this new recommendation of totalizm, at the end of February 2017 I decided that herewith in this item I am going to incorporate that recommendation into the body of the entire philosophy of totalizm, while the abbreviated formulation of it I shall use as the title for this item.
       If this new recommendation was to be expressed in full, then the following words would describe it. "Every elementary action generated by any mechanism is going to introduce both the beneficial (good) as well as undesirable (bad) consequences. Therefore, in order to form systems that generate mostly beneficial (good) effects in our area of interest, it is always necessary to combine together at least two such related mechanisms, the unfavourable (bad) sequences of elementary actions of which will compensate each other."
       This new recommendation of totalizm has a huge scope of applications. With its help it is possible to solve not only technical problems (i.e. to eliminate the "bad" consequences of different technical mechanisms and actions), such as those eliminated in my invention of the Magnocraft and the Oscillatory Chamber. As it turns out, it is also indispensable, for example, in economics, politics, science, and even in various problems of interpersonal relations. I will now review below examples of the use of this recommendation in most important areas of human life, to illustrate and to explain to the reader how this recommendation can be, and sometimes even already is intuitively, used to eliminate the negative consequences of actions taken in practically every area of our lives in the physical world.
       1. Technology. In the technology the principle of eliminating bad consequences (evil) through the use of the recommendation described here, is already applied most often. The reason is that human-built mechanisms from technical devices allow to quickly discover the nature of the problems (evil) that spoil their work. So in order to remedy these problems (evil), designers of next technical devices add to their work additional mechanisms that eliminate the problems (evil) of previously introduced mechanisms. Probably the most commonly known example of such a situation is the "differential" mechanism in wheels of our cars. This mechanism was introduced in cars to cause that when the car turns, the wheels on both sides of the car can rotate at different speeds, so that no wheel is forced to slide along the ground. Unfortunately, on the slippery substrate this mechanism itself also generates a "bad" consequence in the form of rotations of only a sliding wheel. Hence, in off-road vehicles, an additional mechanism has to be introduced that enables the differential mechanism to be switched off when the car is running on slippery surfaces. Of course, the differential mechanism from cars is just one example among thousands of different mechanisms used to eliminate the undesirable (bad) effects of today's technical devices.
       2. Politics. Politicians are chronic in using this principle to avoid adverse consequences (e.g. losing elections) in all their socially unacceptable moves. For example, whenever they decide to impose a new tax, or raise an old one, or legalize their negligence or corruption, at the same time with a big bang they announce something supposedly "good" that they have decided to do (but the date of the initiation of this "good" is usually set for the times of a next government). An excellent such example was the news from the NZ government and NZ milk monopoly, that I saw in television on the day of writing this item, i.e. on 23rd of February 2017. The NZ government announced then that it raised by more than the double the number of deadly "Escherichia coli" (E. coli) bacteria that is allowed to contaminate the waters of New Zealand's rivers and lakes, as these bacteria leak into these rivers and lakes from cow dung. (Previously, the number was 260 bacteria E. coli per 100 ml of water, while on that day it was raised to 540 bacteria per 100 ml of water.) The point is that because of the highly careless and harmful to nature actions of the NZ milk monopoly, which provides cheap butter to almost half of today's world (although in NZ the price of butter is one of the highest in the world), the waters of the rivers in NZ have already been so dangerously polluted with deadly micro-organisms, that in a significant proportion of rivers and lakes no-one is allowed to swim or bath any longer, while dogs typically die if they accidentally drink this water. Of course, being so massively present in NZ rivers and lakes, this murderous bacteria sometimes gets into drinking water causing massive poisoning of whole NZ towns (e.g. see poisoning of water in NZ towns of Havelock North, Hastings and Flaxmere in 2016). So in order to "cool down" the public outcry at politicians, caused as a result of this change of already tragic situation into the future one even worse, the government announced simultaneously that by 2040 it would spend two billion dollars to clean waters of the NZ rivers - see www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00324/claims-of-lowered-water-standards-wrong.htm. (The "trick" of the current NZ politicians and the government boils down to the fact, that in the 2017 election the present government most likely is to lose the power, while the next governments (and future politicians) will only recognize these deteriorating standards of bacterial river pollution, as this will allow them to NOT do anything to rectify the problem, while those next governments almost surely will still have no money nor good will to respect the current government's commitment to spend $2 billion on river cleaning in the future.) As in the example above, corrupt governments and politicians already in almost all of today's world use the same method of announcing something that aggravates the fate of people that they govern, with the simultaneous proclamation of a promise that they will undertake in a distant future some actions which are supposed to improve that fate (but which actions these governments and politicians actually do NOT intend to implement at all).
       3. Science. The problem (evil) with today's official science which desperately holds up its monopoly on research and on education, is that it so much has advanced its corruption and its departure from the truth, that practically everything new that this science officially states, is already a lie. (For various examples of lies of today's official science - see items #D4, #D2, #D2.1, #K1 and #K2 on my web page named dipolar_gravity.htm, item #B3 on my web page named portfolio.htm, item #E1.1 on my web page named telepathy.htm, item #B2 on my web page named humanity.htm, and also see other pages and items linked from there.) Thus, in order to still be able to pretend that this official and extremely costly science keeps discovering something new, and at the same time to avoid becoming officially caught up spreading lies that would compromise its hold on maintaining the present monopoly on research and on education, current professional researchers use the recommendation described here. For example, they announce that they supposedly have discovered something new, but at the same time they locate this discovery where no one of normal people, politicians, financiers, or decision makers is able to verify the truth of this discovery (e.g. locate it in the distant cosmos, in the depths of the ocean, underground, in micro-world, in atoms, in micro-particles, in unknown to people radiation, at "the beginning of times", etc., etc.) Of course, the fact that their lies can also be exposed by their colleagues (i.e. by other scientists) today's scientists do not fear, because the present drowning in corruption and still monopolistic science has already developed effective methods that allow it to crush in the bud all attempts to unmask its lies - similarly as they have been for nearly half a century crushing in the bud and blocking my own attempts to reveal the truth (i.e. attempts crushed and blocked, for example, by disseminating another lie, that I am dealing only with "pseudoscience" and "conspiracy theories" - to check how far away from truth is this another lie of official science, I suggest to look at e.g. available in #A0 from the web page named dipolar_gravity.htm, a shortened description of my theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity or "Codig", or review the listed on the Polish web page skorowidz.htm and in section #A2.1 from the web page named faq_pl.htm examples of topics and problems that bother humanity, the solution for which problems I already have found due to my supposedly private and "pseudoscientific" hobby research).
       4. Economics. Human nature tends to seek obtaining a monopoly in whatever one does, and then jealously maintain this monopoly. Hence, every larger business uses all the forces and resources available to it, to get the monopoly first, and then to hold it for own benefit. This in turn leads to the rise of corruption among politicians (or, more precisely, to rise of bribery), to price rises, to the decline of quality, and ultimately to the collapse of the economic branch dominated by a given monopoly. Hence, people have discovered empirically that monopolies should be vigorously combated. In today's world, they are prevailing only in fallen countries inhabited by bribed and immoral people and rulled by corrupted governments. On the other hand, countries with rightful and moral citizens and governments neutralize in themselves these evil-generating monopolies (and cartels) at the source, by making sure that in every economic realm there is a real competition, which is the other mechanism eliminating the economic evil generated by the trend to creating monopolies or cartels.
       5. Marriage monopoly. For many important reasons, God so created women that their innate qualities lay below the threshold level of stability - for details see description from item #B2 of my web page named antichrist.htm. This is because God created women for living companions of men, so that in the real life the instability of women was compensated by the stability of their men - to which God gave the role of "heads", masters, leaders, administrators, etc. Thus, with their male counterparts in the role of "head", women together with their men form stable units. Unfortunately, the Catholic Church has destroyed this stable units by establishing laws and traditions that a man is allowed to have only one wife. This in turn causes that into the hands of unstable women is given the "marriage monopoly". The monopoly in turn allows that instead of "head" function being performed by men, on the principles of various sexual and legal blackmail and gradual corrupting, currently increasingly more women are assuming the function of the "head", thus destabilizing the men and the entire social life of our civilization - for details see item #J2.2.2 from my web page named morals.htm. Therefore, the only way that the part of our civilization practicing monogamy still has to restore the stability which already is lost due to such "marriage monopoly of women", is the return to "marital competition" through the legal and official restoration of the right to polygamy - i.e. the law that initially existed in the described in Bible times, and hence it is NOT at all contrary to the will and approval of God, but which so unwisely has been undermined by the Catholic Church which allegedly serves God. This legalization of polygamy would replace the current "marriage monopoly" by "marital competition". In turn it is known that even the very potential (i.e. the possibility) of existence of competition is often enough to stop the monopolistic behaviour increasingly abused by today's women - especially those from highly industrialized countries. (How just a potential for marital competition affects people's behaviour, everyone knows from times of engagement - that is, from times when both sides were very willing and tried hard because they knew that if they did not meet certain requirements then they could be replaced by someone else from the pool of easily available competition. However, as soon as this period of engagement changes its status to marriage, that willingness and hard trying almost immediately disappear. This is because in monogamy marriages each side knows that access to potential competition is threatened by the power of marriage laws.) At the same time, a possible legalization of polygamy, apart from the change in relationship of one spouse to another (i.e. apart of change in attitudes and possibilities), for the majority of marriages would not change much. After all, most of the marriages that truly and permanently love and respect each other, thus that do NOT change attitudes towards each other at the time when they marry, do NOT need to try a polygamy, because a monogamy is enough for them. Hence, after restoring rights to polygamy the majority of life situations would look then as they look in present times - only that the rolling down of a large proportion of our civilization to instability would be stopped by this one wise and morally-correct move. For example, the infidelity would then stop exist almost completely, as getting sexually involved with someone else would be linked to the real danger of accepting the duty to marry him/her. Unfortunately, it is unlucky for humanity that because of knowing how strong power women currently hold, the probability that someone before the just incoming collapse of our civilization will dare to restore polygamy in the present monogamy countries, is very low. In turn, when our present civilization is already collapsed, and hence when a polygamy automatically raises itself out of the lawlessness, rape and "rule of the fist" that initially will prevail after the collapse of our civilisation, then the fact that women will lose their "marriage monopoly" will no longer protect humanity from a painful fall, hunger, chaos, and destruction - which I described in items #H1 to #H3 of my web page named prophecies.htm.
       6. Social life. If someone has a hospitable and friendly nature, favourable living conditions, and an attractive place of living, then also has many guests. Most of people, with whom this person is in friendship, like to organize "invasions" on his/her house and life, as frequently as they want to. Unfortunately, these guests NOT only bring nice consequences, but also many bad consequences. Hence, to neutralize this evil, it is necessary to additionally introduce some mechanism that restricts these "invaders" only to arriving when there is actually an opportunity and a need. The most commonly used of such additional mechanisms is to impose some kind of hardship (e.g. to ask the guests for physical help in some hard work, or to make for them an awkward place to sleep, or to find an awkward day for a visit, etc.).
       7. The elimination (killing) of the unproductive, prodigal, and harmful group-intellects financed by taxpayers from taxes. In item #E2 of this web page I explained that there are two different types of so-called "intellects", the life of which is subjected to governing by moral mechanisms. These are: (a) individual intellects (i.e. single people) and (b) group-intellects (i.e. businesses, institutions, organizations, governments, countries, armies, religions, sciences, etc.). In turn, if the life of any intellect is NOT prematurely terminated, then after the birth, each of these intellects passes through the following five periods or phases: (i) learning and growth, (ii) production and addition of its contribution to the society, (iii) errors and distortions, (iv) unproductiveness, wastefulness and harming; (v) death and removal of harmful residues from these intellects. (At this point, it is worth noting that, unlike individual intellects, the death of group intellects does NOT have to depend on their complete disappearance from the surface of earth, but may depend on, for example, a profound transformation of the goals of their existence, principles on which they work, the composition of their leadership, etc. For example, the death of the former communist Poland occurred when Poland, as a country, was transformed into the present capitalist Poland. It is also worth to note that the transformation of each of these periods or phases into a next one typically occurs through a smooth increase and decrease, hence it is difficult to note and define them, and there are no clearly defined boundaries between them.) Since every intellect consists of imperfect people in which the changes of attributes over time are governed by similar mechanisms, each one among the above five periods or phases typically lasts only for the same and predetermined in advance number of years. So, for example, the period (i) of learning and growth, for individual people typically last around 20 years, while for group intellects lasts around from one year, up to maximum a few years. The period (ii) of production and adding its contribution to the society, both for individuals and for group intellects typically lasts only around 30 years. After production arrives the period (iii) of errors and deviations, which in all intellects typically lasts around 10 years. In this period, a given intellect begins to overgrow in a variety of bad habits and deviated tendencies, and also has already such "connections and influences", that instead of producing or doing something for the good of society, it begins to take care of almost exclusively of its private interests. An excellent example of this period (iii) could be the situation with the internet at the time of writing this sub-item in March 2017, when the internet began to be increasingly used to spy on its users, to cheat, con, blackmail, lie, vilify, scare, bully, humiliate people, etc. - instead to the purpose for which it was originally created (i.e. instead of disseminating knowledge and exchanging information). After the period (iii) of errors and deviations, come period (iv) of the unproductiveness, waste, and harming - that continues until period (v) of the death of given intellect. In this period (iv) a given intellect typically ceases to generate any product, and begins to waste virtually all of its acquisitions that previously managed to gather. In turn its habits and tendencies typically start to be so distorted and bad, that this intellect begins to implement goals that are exactly opposite to the goals for which it was originally created. An excellent example of the group-intellect from this period (iv) is the today's earthly official science, described four sub-items above. After all, instead of searching for, and propagating, the truth, almost the only thing that it nowadays is looking and caring for, are lies, and earning of its luminaries, while to find and to develop these lies, and earnings, it spends increasingly higher sums of money paid by taxpayers. Fortunately, in a significant proportion of group intellects that generate their own income which keeps them alive, this period (iv) lasts short, because they quickly "die", i.e. they are bankrupted or "eaten" by younger and economically more and better acting competition. The problem, however, is with the intellects that live at the expense of taxpayers. These intellects, by themselves, that is, without the decision of politicians that kills them, do NOT die, but they are trying to live indefinitely long demanding ever greater amounts of taxpayers’ money to sustain their unproductive and prodigal life. After all, their management, and employees that they gradually select and keep, are already accustomed to ever higher wages, decreasing workload, and comfortable living. So in order to kill them, typically a politician must have the courage to make the decision that cuts them off from the funding by taxpayers. Unfortunately, such a decision is not easy to make, because these intellects, in spite that in practice they for a long time have been unproductive, prodigal and socially detrimental, nevertheless still know how to yell loudly and devise thousands of reasons that deceive people, why the taxpayer should continue to finance them. So the politician who puts them to death risks, for example, losing the next election, or being pushed away from politics. Hence, in order to neutralize the evil that introduces the arrival to that period (iv) of an increasing number of such group-intellects financed by taxpayers, it is necessary to introduce some additional mechanism, which is to compensate the evil consequences resulting from their killing, for example, to introduce an impersonal or automatic killing them after the expiry of these 30 years of period (ii) of their productive life - i.e. without the need that a politician is obliged to assume the responsibility for killing them. The recommendation of totalizm described here indicates how to develop and implement a number of such mechanisms. For example, (A) at the time of creating a new group-intellect funded by taxpayers, it can be determined in advance after how many years it will automatically be eliminated (killed) - note that this number of years should NOT be higher than 30. Or instead of killing a given intellect, (B) a competition can be created for it, while that competition either will cause it to drastically transform into a different group-intellect already operating on completely different principles, or else, e.g. because of its unchangeable habits of unproductiveness, waste and harm, the society itself will kill it (e.g. through a financial "starving"). An example of just such a solution through the establishment of a competition, is my suggestion of endangering with killing, or with drastic transforming, the nowadays already unproductive, deceptive, wasteful and harmful official science, by establishing a "competition" for the current official science in the form of a new "totaliztic science" (i.e. the science which is new and competitive to the old one, and which I described in more details in items #C1 and #C6 from my web page named telekinetics.htm). Yet another way of neutralizing the ill effects of killing of such group-intellects already in their period (iv) of life, would be that, for example, instead of financing them by taxpayers, they may be (C) re-qualified for voluntary contributions from human donations, or (D) re-qualified for being financed from own income of these intellects. (Both these changed funding rules would very soon kill them - after all such intellects in the phase (iv) of their lives are already too used to unprofessional, prodigal and destructive behaviour.) Etc., etc. If one looks carefully around, then he/she notices that there is already too much of such unprofitable, prodigal, and harmful to people group-intellects financed by taxpayers. Because they have mastered to perfection the art of telling everyone that they are very needed and that they must be financed further, no present politician will risk trying to kill them. Hence, in addition to the corruption and waste by politicians and governments, most of whom also have already entered their own period (iv), i.e. alongside the political corruption and wastefulness described e.g. in items #E1 to #E5 of the web page named pajak_for_mp_2017.htm, among others these already dying group-intellects force on governments the rapid and continual increase in immoral taxes (for more information about the immorality of taxes see items #T1 to #T5 from the web page named humanity.htm), and hence force also a rapid decline in the living standards of today's inhabitants of practically every country. This is because such group-intellects are like a horde of blood-sucking monsters devouring the taxpayers, who can gradually suck out all the "blood" and all the ability to achieve prosperity and to lead a happy and peaceful life. It is therefore worthwhile to put mental effort and knowledge of principles of the philosophy of totalizm described here, to discover such non-inducing bad consequences, and morally correct mechanisms and ways of automatic killing of this ever-increasing pack of such highly dangerous and harmful for the humanity tax-funded group-intellects. Notice also, that if an individual person is employed as a bureaucrat (office worker) for more than 10 years in the same institution, then he/she typically begins to behave like such "taxpayer funded group intellect" in (iv) phase of its life. Therefore the employment of office workers (including managers) in one and the same institution should NOT exceed 10 years, after which they should be made redundant.
       Of course, in real life we may easily notice a whole lot of examples of similar use of the recommendation described in this item. But even when we analyze only the examples provided above, we still will note that the use of recommendation described here always shows several characteristic features. So let's list now the most important among these features. (1) With the help of this recommendation, typically it is possible to eliminate only one kind of consequences that are "bad" for us, namely those on the elimination of which in the given case we are most interested. (2) The use of this recommendation does NOT eliminate all the bad effects of whatever we do, especially those that appear in different areas than we consider. (3) Someone's use of this recommendation does NOT prevent God from serving "absolute justice", nor is blocking the action of moral mechanisms and moral laws. (4) This recommendation is one out of those tools that leave their users to choose whether to use it to do good, or to do evil. (5) The manner in which someone uses the recommendation described here is also the subject to judgment and the subsequent reward or punishment by God, in accordance with the principles of "absolute justice" served by God.
       The situation from real life, for which we would all like to use the discussed here recommendation of totalizm, would be a possible attempt to avoid the incoming soon mass extinction of mankind. The scenario of this imminent annihilation of most of the present humanity was published as long ago as February 2009 in item #H3 from my web page named prophecies.htm. About this mass extinction is also warning viewers the 35 minute long YouTube biographic film entitled "Dr Jan Pająk portfolio". If we look closely at what is going on around us, then it turns out that my scenario of this extermination is gradually being fulfilled exactly as I described it in there. By March 2017, when I wrote this item, almost one third of this scenario was fulfilled. So only a very decisive action of all mankind could stop this our stubborn pursuit towards a self-destruction. However, in order such a decisive action could take place, the humanity would need a kind of institution that would perform the same function as "compasses" perform for the wandering ships. Such an institution should be an official science. Unfortunately, due to its current monopoly, this science prefers to deal with matters that I have already described previously, among others above in the sub-item devoted to it. So in order to draw the human attention to the truth and to rectify the period (iv) of errors and distortions in which is currently the official science, it would be necessary to use the recommendation described here - e.g. for appointing formally a new "totaliztic science" which is competitive towards the old official one, which through undertaking of the education and dissemination of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (Codig) and the philosophy of totalizm, as well as which by correcting the lies of the so-far monopolistic official science, would restore truth, moderation, reasoning, and moral behaviour to humanity so intensely pushed now towards a self-destruction because of current distortions and the lack of sticking to truth of the institution of official science which should perform (but is NOT) the function of a righteous "compass".


#A3. Further guidelines on the totaliztic acting in lives are indicated by the rest of totalizm:

       This web page of limited size is aimed at revealing only the essence of the philosophy of totalizm, not on teaching entire this moral philosophy. Therefore, in order to not extend this web page, I am NOT going to list here any more guidelines of the totaliztic acting in our everyday life. After all, such guidelines emerge by themselves - of someone learns the work of moral mechanisms and principles described by the philosophy of totalizm. Furthermore, a whole array of such guidelines for totaliztic acting in specific life situations is indicated by various other my web pages and publications. For example, another set of guidelines, similar to the above, is briefly summarised e.g. in items #C4.2 to #C4.7 from the web page named morals.htm, item #F1 from the web page named rok_uk.htm, or e.g. item #J1 from the web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm. In turn, to a full extend these guidelines are explained in textbooks of totalizm indicated in item #A4 below - for examples see subsection A16 and NG6.4 in my newest monograph [1/5].


#A4. Manuals of totalizm:

       Here are free of charge manuals of totalizm available at present for downloading from the Internet - listed in the order from a newest one to the oldest (click on the green description of the selected manual to download it to your computer):
Newest: volumes 1, 6 to 8, 12 to 13 and 4 to 5 of monograph [1/5] in PDF,
Older: the entire illustrated monograph [8e/2] in PDF,
Still older: volumes 4 to 9 and 4 to 5 of monograph [1/4] in PDF,
Oldest: the entire illustrated monograph [8e] in PDF and non-illustrated monograph [8e] w DOC and WP5.
       While using textbooks and publications of totalizm, it is worth to know that since their illustrated versions in PDF format were developed, their older non-illustrated versions disseminated in WORD.DOC and WORD_PERFECT.WP5 formats ceased to be updated. But these older and already non-updated versions were NOT removed from Internet, so that interested readers still are able to upload and review them. But if someone is NOT interested in the history and the evolution of given ideas, then while downloading a given manual he or she should rather seek the most recent one, means illustrated and updated version of it in the PDF format.


#A5. Notice how to spell the name "totalizm":

       Totalizm should not be confused with "totalitarianism". Totalitarianism is a fascism-like immoral philosophy which in almost every aspect is completely opposite to totalizm. Unfortunately, for some very strange reasons, a few years after the name "totalizm" described here started to gradually disseminate throughout the world, various anonymous individuals rapidly rushed to rename "totalitarianism" onto a shorter name totalism. Fortunately, the shorter name for the reactive philosophy "totalism", these individuals usually wrote with the letter s, i.e. NOT with the letter z - which is used by the moral "totalizm" described here. The interesting part of this strange phenomenon is, that individuals who use the name "totalism" in the meaning "totalitarianism" seem to overlook that