Jeśli jesteś właścicielem tej strony, możesz wyłączyć reklamę poniżej zmieniając pakiet na PRO lub VIP w panelu naszego hostingu już od 4zł!
"Morality" in "a priori" interpretation of the "totaliztic science"
(multilingual, e.g. in English For English version click on this flag, Polish Dla polskiej wersji kliknij na ta flage, etc.)
(Parts of this web page are still to be translated into English)
Updated:
12 September 2016


Click "X" or "No" on e.g. messages of supposed errors, or on advertisements, if these try to interrupt your viewing of this web page.



Menu 1:

(Choice of language:)


(Organising:)

Homepage

Links

Menu 2

Menu 4

FAQ

Text [11] in PDF


(English here:)

Moral laws

Morals in PDF

Source replica of this page

Karma

Concept of Dipolar Gravity

Totalizm

Parasitism

About God

Proof of God

Proof of Soul

Free Will

Nirvana

Solar energy

Free energy

Telekinetic cell

Sonic boiler

Telekinetics

Zero pollution cars

Telekinesis

Telekinesis Free Zone

Telepathy

Earthquake

Seismograph

Artefact

Concept of Dipolar Gravity

Totalizm

Parasitism

Karma

Moral laws

Nirvana

Proof of soul

Time vehicles

Immortality

Propulsion

Magnocraft

Oscillatory Chamber

Military use of magnocraft

Tapanui

New Zealand

New Zealand attractions

Evidence of UFO activities

UFO photographs

Cloud-UFOs

Bandits amongst us

Tornado

Hurricanes

Katrina

Landslides

Demolition of hall in Katowice

Predators

26th day

Petone

Prophecies

Plague

Changelings

WTC

Columbia

Aliens

UFOnauts

Formal proof for the existence of UFOs

Evil

Antichrist

About God

Proof for the existence of God

God's methods

The Bible

Free will

Truth

Dr Jan Pająk portfolio

About me (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak)

Old "about me"

My job search

Aleksander Możajski

Pigs from Chinese zodiac

Pigs Photos

Healing

Tropical fruit

Fruit folklore

Food handling

Evolution of humans

All-in-one

Greek keyboard

Russian keyboard

Solving Rubik's cube 3x3=9

Solving Rubik's cube 4x4=16

Jan's playlists (only under "Google Chrome")

Instruction of playlists

Wrocław

Malbork

Milicz

Battle of Milicz

St. Andrea Bobola

Village Cielcza

Village Stawczyk

Wszewilki

Wszewilki of tomorrow

Korea

Hosta

1964 class of Ms Hass in Milicz

TUWr graduates 1970

Lectures 1999

Lectures 2001

Lectures 2004

Lectures 2007

Better humanity

Pajak for parliament 2014

Pajak regarding 2017

Pajak for parliament 2017

Party of totalizm

Party of totalizm statute

FAQ - questions

Replicate

Memorial

Sabotages

Index of content with links

Menu 2

Menu 4

Source replica of page menu

Text [11] in PDF

Text [8e/2]

Text [8e]

Text [7]

Text [7/2]

Text [6/2]

Text [5/3]

Figs [5/3]

Text [2e]

Figures [2e]: 1, 2, 3

Text [1e]

Figures [1e]: 1, 2, 3

X text [1/4]

Monograph [1/4]:
E, 1, 2, 3, P, X

Monograph [1/5]



(Polskie tutaj:)

Prawa moralne

Prawa moralne w PDF

Źródłowa replika tej strony

Karma

Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji

Totalizm

Pasożytnictwo

O Bogu

Dowód Boga

Dowód Duszy

Wolna wola

Nirwana

Energia słoneczna

Darmowa energia

Telekinetyczne ogniwo

Grzałka soniczna

Telekinetyka

Samochody bez spalin

Telekineza

Strefa wolna od telekinezy

Telepatia

Trzęsienia ziemi

Sejsmograf

Artyfakt

Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji

Totalizm

Pasożytnictwo

Karma

Prawa moralne

Nirwana

Dowód na duszę

Wehikuły czasu

Nieśmiertelność

Napędy

Magnokraft

Komora oscylacyjna

Militarne użycie magnokraftu

Tapanui

Nowa Zelandia

Atrakcje Nowej Zelandii

Dowody działań UFO na Ziemi

Fotografie UFO

Chmury-UFO

Bandyci wśród nas

Tornado

Huragany

Katrina

Lawiny ziemne

Zburzenie hali w Katowicach

Ludobójcy

26ty dzień

Petone

Przepowiednie

Plaga

Podmieńcy

WTC

Columbia

Kosmici

UFOnauci

Formalny dowód na istnienie UFO

Zło

Antychryst

O Bogu naukowo

Dowód na istnienie Boga

Metody Boga

Biblia

Wolna wola

Prawda

Dr Jan Pająk portfolio

O mnie (dr inż. Jan Pająk)

Starsze "o mnie"

Poszukuję pracy

Aleksander Możajski

Świnka z chińskiego zodiaku

Zdjęcia ozdobnych świnek

Radości po 60-tce

Kuramina

Uzdrawianie

Owoce tropiku

Owoce w folklorze

Postępowanie z żywnością

Ewolucja ludzi

Wszystko-w-jednym

Grecka klawiatura

Rosyjska klawiatura

Rozwiązanie kostki Rubika 3x3=9

Rozwiązanie kostki Rubika 4x4=16

Playlisty Jana (tylko pod "Google Chrome")

Instrukcja do playlist

Wrocław

Malbork

Milicz

Bitwa o Milicz

Św. Andrzej Bobola

Liceum Ogólnokształcące w Miliczu

Klasa Pani Hass z LO Milicz

Absolwenci PWr 1970

Nasz rok

Wykłady 1999

Wykłady 2001

Wykłady 2004

Wykłady 2007

Wieś Cielcza

Wieś Stawczyk

Wszewilki

Zwiedzaj Wszewilki i Milicz

Wszewilki jutra

Zlot "Wszewilki-2007"

Unieważniony Zjazd "2007"

Poprzedni Zlot "2006"

Raport Zlotu "2006"

Korea

Hosta

Lepsza ludzkość

Pajak do sejmu 2014 r.

Pajak na prezydenta 2015 r.

Pajak na prezydenta 2020 r.

Pajak dla prezydentury 2020 r.

Partia totalizmu

Statut partii totalizmu

FAQ - częste pytania

Replikuj

Memoriał

Sabotaże

Skorowidz

Menu 2

Menu 4

Źródłowa replika strony menu

Tekst [11] w PDF

Tekst [10] w PDF

Tekst [8p/2]

Tekst [8p]

Tekst [7]

Tekst [7/2]

Tekst [7b]

Tekst [6/2]

[5/4]: 1, 2, 3

Tekst [4c]: 1, 2, 3

Tekst [4b]

Tekst [3b]

Tekst [2]

[1/3]: 1, 2, 3

X tekst [1/4]

Monografia [1/4]:
P, 1, 2, 3, E, X

Monografia [1/5]


(По русски:)

Бог

Меню 2

Меню 4

Peпликa иcтoчникa этoй cтрaницы

Клавиатура


(Ελληνικά εδώ:)

Θεός

Επιλογές 2

Επιλογές 4

Αντίγραφο πηγής αυτής της σελίδας

Πληκτρολόγιο


(Hier auf Deutsch:)

Dr Jan Pająk portfolio

Über mich

Freie Energie

Telekinesis

Moralische Gesetze

Totalizm

Menu 2

Menu 4

Quelreplica dieser Seite


(Aquí en espańol:)

Energía libre

Telekinesis

Leyes morales

Totalizm

Sobre mí

Menu 2

Menu 4

Reproducción de la fuente de esta página


(Ici en français:)

Énergie libre

Telekinesis

Lois morales

Totalizm

Au sujet de moi

Menu 2

Menu 4

Reproduction de source de cette page


(Qui in italiano:)

Energia libera

Telekinesis

Leggi morali

Totalizm

Testo di [7]

Circa me

Menu 2

Menu 4

Replica di fonte di questa pagina




Menu 2:

(scrollable)

Here is the list of all web pages which should be available at this address (i.e. from this server), arranged by language (in 8 languages). It represents a more frequently updated version of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this web page to run it:

Here the page menu2.htm should be displayed.

(The same list can also be displayed from "Menu 1" by clicking Menu 2.)



Menu 3:

(Alternative addresses of this page:)

(On paid servers:)

totalizm.pl

energia.sl.pl

totalizm.zensza.webd.pl

pajak.org.nz

(On free hosting but with FTP:)

geocities.ws/immortality

telekinesis.esy.es

(Older versions:)

tornados2005.narod.ru

dhost.info/nirvana

morals.mypressonline.com

pigs.20megsfree.com

prism.20fr.com

prawda.20fr.com

totalizm.20fr.com

totalism.50megs.com

ufonauci.w.interia.pl




Menu 4:

(scrollable)

Here is the list of addresses of all totaliztic web sites that still worked at the date of the most recent update of this web page. At each of these addresses should be available all totaliztic web pages listed in "Menu 1" or "Menu 2", including also their different language versions (i.e. versions in languages: Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select the address which you wish to open by dragging scroll bars in small window below, then click on this address to run it. When opens the web page which represents this address, then choose from its "Manu 1" or "Menu 2" the web page which interests you and click on it to view that page:

Here the page menu.htm should be displayed.

(The above list can also be displayed from "Menu 1" by clicking Menu 4.)


If we, people, "give a life" to any new thing, then we always require this thing is displaying some level of "obedience" towards us. For example, when we build a new car, we require from it to be "obedient" towards orders of its driver. A new computer must be obedient to its user and programmer. Etc., etc. In turn, if something refuses to be "obedient" - as this sometimes is the case e.g. with prototypes of badly designed military airplanes of a new type, the outcome is always a catastrophe which causes a lot of evil, while in the consequences of which this "disobedient" product must be destroyed while its chance to "receive a life" must be taken away from it. If we thoroughly consider the above regularity, then it turns out that this "requirement of obedience" towards own "creator" is a kind of universal "law of nature". In fact it spreads its validity onto everything that receives a "life" from a creator. And so, for example we already have films of the "Terminator" type which reveal the vastness of evil that "disobedient robots" can bring to the humanity. From rich Western countries we already know consequences of immoral actions of undisciplined children which typically are symbols of the lack of "obedience" towards their parents - for more details see item #J2.4 from the further part of this web page. Etc., etc. So if this requirement of "obedience" towards a given "creator" is the manifestation of action of some universal "law of nature", then, of course, this law must let itself to be known to people much earlier, and thus it received some well-known name already a long time ago. So if we search under what name we all know this universal law, then it turns out that this name spells "morality". This is why the so-called "totaliztic science", which researches our reality from the philosophical approach called "a priori", defines "morality", amongst others, in the following manner: "morality is the level of 'obedience' with which an inferior 'intellect' fulfils commands and requirements of an intellect superior for it that gave to it some form of a new life". Because in the "physical world" there is a whole hierarchy of various "inferior intellects" which receive from someone a new form of life, the "totaliztic science" distinguishes a number of different "moralities". For example every robot that received the so-called "artificial intelligence" is to display a "morality of the robot". Every son is to manifest towards his parents a "morality of the son", while every daughter - a "morality of the daughter". Wives after getting married receive a new kind of life from their husbands - thus they display to them later "moralities of wives". In turn every living person also displays towards God the unique for this person primary "morality" (this most primary morality is defined as the "obedience" of that person towards commandments and requirements of God). This web page presents views of the new "totaliztic science" on all such most vital categories of morality.


Part #A: Introductory information about this web page:

      

#A1. What are goals of this web page:

Motto: "Without learning the truth there is NO progress."

       Everyone of us believes that already knows everything about "morality". After all, in practically every religion the topic of morality takes the lion share, while e.g. in Christianity the presentation of moral requirements occupies the majority of volume of the Bible. Also the so-called "atheistic orthodox science" (means this official science, the claims of which - in majority later discovered to be erroneous, we still must learn in schools and at universities) devotes to morality a number of subjects and specialised topics - e.g. consider the subject of "philosophy" or topics concerning various "ethics". But is it really true that religions and this official human science teach us everything what we need and should know about morality?
       After all, we should remember, that e.g. religions repeat to their faithful just increasingly a smaller fraction from whatever God revealed to their founders, saints, and devotees. And we must understand that God has this principle that He reveals to people only the most vital "starters of knowledge" - that later are to inspire humans to own searches for knowledge and truth - means He does NOT support laziness and stupidity by effortless giving to people ready-made solution for everything (which fact is explained on a number of totaliztic web pages, e.g. in item #H3 of the web page named god_proof.htm or in item #B4.1 of the web page named immortality.htm). Thus, it is also sure, that God gave to people just these most vital "starters of the knowledge" about morality, while the rest of this knowledge He wants that people laboriously worked out for themselves. It means that also in matters of morality God revealed to us just the answer to the question "what?" - while answers to questions "how?", "why?", "from what it stems?", "where it comes from?", "which facts confirm this?", "how to prove that this is an absolute truth?", etc., God leaves to own working them out by ourselves.
       In turn that old, official so-called "atheistic orthodox science" intentionally limits its research methodologies to just a single approach to research, which by philosophers is called "a posteriori" - means "from effects to causes". In turn, as this is explained in item #A2.6 from the web page named totalizm.htm and also item #C1 on the web page named telekinetics.htm, such "a posteriori" approach to research allows the official human science to learn at most "a half of truth" on every subject. So practically also on the topic of "morality" this official human science can learn NOT more than "a half of truth". In addition, the official science for an openly unadmited goal of its efforts assumed the denial of everything that is stated in holy books (mainly in the Bible) - in this also to deny and to deviate everything that the Bible states in matters of morality. For this purpose the official science formulates even its own version of the deviated morality, which in items #B2, #B6 and #B7 of this web page is called the "scientific morality" - and the major function of which is to undermine the reliability of the "true morality" required from us by God and described in items #B5 to #B7 from this web page. In order to learn also this "still unknown to the humanity parts of truth about the 'true morality' ", it is necessary to learn what on the subject of morality determined that new "totaliztic science" which is competitive towards the old official science, and which objectively researchers the reality from an opposite approach called "a priori" - means "from the cause to effects" or "from God understood as a superior cause of everything, to reality which surrounds us that represents effects of actions of that God". Therefore, the main goal of this web page is just to determine and indicate the most vital information about this "still unknown to the humanity parts of truth regarding morality" - about which God decided that effortlessly is NOT revealing them to religions (so that it forces people to put their effort into an active seeking of truth), while which the old, official "atheistic orthodox science" is unable to determine because of the hidden goals it pursues and the limitations of research methods that it uses, but which already resulted from research and findings of the new "totaliztic science".
       Of course, in addition to the above main goal, this web page has also several additional goals, e.g. explaining to the reader basic ideas and quantities that rule over morality - including the hugely vital for us so-called "indicators of moral correctness", revealing the most vital punishments for immoral behaviours and most vital rewards for living according to moral requirements, indicating how implement practically the morally correct behaviour in our own life, etc., etc.


#A2. According to the "totaliztic science", moralities of subsequent intellects form a hierarchical structure:

Motto: "Only a person who acts 'morally' is able to reveal to others truths regarding moral behaviours."

       One does NOT need to know the "totaliztic science" to understand that "givers" of new forms of life are formed into a kind of hierarchy. For example, parents give a new life to their children, in turn these children can give a new form of life to computer programs that they wrote (e.g. to computer viruses), to robots that they build, etc. Because the new "totaliztic science" defines "morality" as a form of obedience towards requirements and commandments of the one who gave to us a "new form of life", it is obvious that also subsequent kinds of "morality" will be formed into a kind of hierarchical structure. In this structure, the most superior will be the morality defined for people by God. After all, God is the most superior creator, who gave the life to all people. The second layer of morality, already inferior in relationship to this God's one, is the "morality of descendants" defined by parents for their children, and also the morality of wives and husbands defined by their spouses. There is also a third level in the hierarchy of morality. This is the morality of everything to which people gave a new form of life. For example, while building "robots" or "military drones" - for each one of them people design the new "morality of a robot" or "morality of a drone" (see subsections #J1 and #J2.5 near the end of this web page) which actually is the reflection of their own morality. While writing programs such as "computer viruses", they encode into them the reflection of their own morality in the form of "morality of computer viruses". In turn while bringing up and teaching e.g. dogs, owners of these also create specific "moralities of given dogs". (Notice, that in all "wild animals" deprived of conscience, the morality is shaped by God Himself.) More information on the subject of hierarchy of morality described here is provided in item #J1 near the end of this web page.
       The awareness of the existence of the above "hierarchy of morality" is very vital. After all, everyone of us takes a specific place in this hierarchy. So everyone of us manifests some form of "morality" towards the one who gave to him or her a "new form of life" (i.e. towards God, parents, spouse). Each one of us imposes also specific moral requirements and rules onto these ones to whom he or she gave a "new form of life" - e.g. onto spouse, children, dogs, computers, robots which he or she builds, drones with which kills enemies of own country, etc. It happens, that the main requirement imposed by God on forming a new morality located below in this hierarchy, is that in any aspect it must NOT be contradictive to all moralities superior towards it (e.g. the "morality of a given person", or the "morality of a son or daughter", must NOT be contradictive to the morality given to all people by God, while e.g. the "morality of a robot" or the "morality of programs" must NOT be contradictive to the morality of people given to humans by God). If in any aspect such an inferior morality is contradictive to any morality superior towards it, then it fulfils the definition of "immorality", while these ones who practice it become the immoral parasites, from which the right to lead a "new form of life" by a definition must be taken away (and really, as this is documented by the evidence from "part #C" of this web page, with the elapse of time typically the right to live is taken away from them).


#A3. The history of this web page:

Motto: "... when that one arrives, the spirit of the truth, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak of his own impulse, but what things he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things coming." (Bible, "Evangel according to St. John", verse 16:13)

       If someone asks me what is the most difficult to write about, then I would answer that personally I have the biggest difficulty with writing about myself (this is why I always delay the writing and update of the web page about myslef (Dr Jan Pajak) indicated in item #O5 near the end of this web page). In turn second in the order of most difficult tasks, in my opinion is to write about "morality" - as this is done on this web page. This is why, in spite that since a long time the philosophy of totalizm revealed to me that "morality is the key to everything", explaining of this fact on this web page to other people always presented for me the greatest difficulty and challenge. In fact, this web page was rewritten entirely two times already, while additionally improved several times. The first version of it was formulated in March 2004. But I was NOT happy with it. However the difficulty of writing about morality caused that I delayed the rewriting it. Finally I decided that I must NOT delay it any further. So in May 2011 I prepared this version of it, which I decided to drastically improve and update in December 2014. Although I am continually aware that it still does NOT reflect well the unimaginably vital role that "morality" performs in our lives, I am also aware that in order to improve this web page to the level of perfection that it deserves, it will take me several further years of continuous improvements and increasingly more detailed research. Therefore I am appealing here to the reader to forgive me imperfections and drawbacks which is going to encounter in the text that is to follow, and still read this web page in the form in which so-far I managed to prepare it. After all, our knowledge about morality is so immensely vital, that even from imperfect sources, such as this web page, we still need to learn it thoroughly, and then adopt it and pedantically implement it in every situation from our everyday lives.


#A4. Do you know that the majority of your (and other people) decisions and actions is "immoral" because is breaking various moral criteria, and thus must be "punished", amongst others, by the cancellation of their long-term beneficial consequences:

Motto: "Those who decide or act immorally, only waste their time, effort, resources and life - after all, the moral mechanisms in their long-term operation invalidate everything that humans have accomplished as a result of immoral decisions and actions."

       It just so happens that we live in times when the majority of people instead of working towards the elimination of their own imperfections, such as greed, lust, selfishness, deviations, favouritism, etc., they rather prefer to cultivate these imperfections and corrupt with them the morality of the whole society by giving to these imperfections a status of legal "rights" that are owned to people. For this reason, as a result of the increasingly powerful public pressure of an increasing mass of such people with corrupt morals, even religions that once taught of principles of the moral conduct, now are also afraid to openly teach the duty to obey the moral principles. So instead of teaching to people methods of meeting the requirements of morality, about which God has told us quite clearly e.g. in the Bible - that we have an obligation to permanently imprint them into our characters, currently religions limit themselves to only promising what prizes await us in heaven, if we regularly participate in the rites of given religion and at the same time we give generously "on the tray". In addition, all religions do NOT carry out by themselves, nor promote carrying out by others, the searches for answers to these most important questions about morality, listed in item #A1 of this web page (i.e. searches for answers reaching much further than to merely already been given by God answers to the question "what?") - the finding of which answers God intentionally left to people for a laborious earning. Just as with religion, also is with the present official science. After all, already some time ago the official science has set to itself the officially unspoken goal of denying everything that God says in the scriptures. No wonder that our science neither does teaching, nor objectively researches, the true morality required from people by God. In the result of this ignoring of research and abandoning of teaching of morality by both religions and by official science, in present times the entire humanity begins to act increasingly immoral - to which fact I am trying to direct the attention of readers and to illustrate it on numerous examples, e.g. in item #C4.2 from this web page, in item #B5 from my other web page named p_instruction.htm, in item #T1 from another my web page named humanity.htm, while jokingly also in the second paragraph of item #G3 yet another my web page named prophecies.htm, as well as in a whole range of further totaliztic publications.
       Of course, it is unspeakably pity that both religions, as well as the old official "atheistic orthodox science", do NOT conduct reliable research nor actual teaching of morality. After all, the newly emerging "totaliztic science" has already established that virtually everything that people do, can be carried out either in accordance with the criteria of morality, that is, in a moral manner, or in a manner that violates these criteria of morality, that is, in an immoral way. This new "totaliztic science" has also discovered empirically and then documented it on a required sample of cases from the real life, that every "moral" acting in the long term is rewarded by moral mechanisms, while every "immoral" human behaviour is severely punished by the same moral mechanisms. That long-term rewarding and punishing is also made with an iron hand, regardless of whether one is aware or not, that in a given case acted morally or immorally. At the same time, the most important penalty, which in the long-term operation of moral mechanisms is systematically served still in this physical life for every immoral action and every immoral decision, is the cancellation (elimination and lost) of all the benefits that previously for a short term have been achieved as a result of the immoral action or decision. In other words, because of the ignoring of reliable research on the mechanisms of work of actual morality required from the people by God, and also because of the neglect of teaching morality, the humanity still is NOT aware that over the time everything that humans have accomplished as a result of immoral behaviour is cancelled and lost. And these losses are huge. For example, on two occasions I analyzed for the compliance with moral criteria, these fragments of governmental decisions, that reached the public (and my) knowledge (after all, NOT all decisions of the government the public and I had the opportunity to learn), and later fragments of these analyzes I dared to carefully describe on my web pages when discussing the earthquake in Christchurch and the elections to Parliament in 2014. As these analysis had revealed to me, a majority of decisions of today governments violates various moral criteria. This in turn, in the light of current knowledge about the principle of systematic punishment by moral mechanisms for every immoral decision and every immoral action, as described here, makes it already absolutely certain, that the beneficial consequences of the majority of governmental decisions are later completely lost as a result of long-term work of moral mechanisms. Thus, the making of immoral decisions at the government level leads directly to an unimaginable waste of the human time, effort, and resources - including the wasting of taxes so ruthlessly executed from individual people to finance with them these immoral government decisions. In fact, if just only a half of decisions of the government of a country was made in accordance with the criteria of morality, and thus in the long-term work would NOT have to be punished by moral mechanisms with the cancellation of beneficial effects of these decisions, then the life in the country ruled by such a government would become similar to living in a paradise. Except that, unfortunately, the long-term beneficial effects of such making mainly morally correct decisions, would fully disclose themselves only after the so-called "time of return" of karma by the moral mechanisms, explained in item #C4.2 below - which the "time of return" in some cases of behaviours of entire countries can be extended even to about 70 or 100 years, while very rarely is less than about 7 years. Hence these politicians, who would implement such morally correct actions, typically would NOT benefit from the results of own efforts and decisions, while sometimes they probably would NOT even live until the long-term fruits of their labour will be revealed - which situation in the today's human attitudes described by the saying "after me is OK if even the end of the world is to come", does NOT induce a much hope that in fact there will be any politicians who are to base their decisions on the criteria of morality.
       It is worth to add here, that it is good to learn the approximate "times of return" for moral or immoral acting. (Approximately these times are provided in item #C4.2 - although for specific intellects the reader can also determine and check them by himself or herself even much more accurately.) After all, on one hand, they provide us with evidence for the confirmation of the truth of descriptions from this web page, while on the other hand, they allow to determine empirically, for example, what proportion of the actions or decisions of governments, of any institutions, or of any persons, meet the criteria of morality - that means is moral. After all, if e.g. someone builds a permanent house (from e.g. bricks), but he or she does it in an immoral way, then after a time greater than this "time of return", the house will NOT exist any more. This is because the principle of automatic punishment by moral mechanisms will cause, that in order to invalidate the beneficial consequences of this immoral building, the house will be either abandoned and fall into disrepair, or e.g. a cataclysm will destroy it, or will be taken by the court and demolished, etc., etc. So instead of existing for several hundred years, as its durable materials allow this, this house for sure is to NOT exist after a little more than 10 years - if it was built by an individual person, or after a little more than 100 years - if it was built by the government or by an institution (i.e. by the so-called "group intellect"). In other words, if, for example, we want to know what proportion of the actions of a given government, or a given institution, complies with the criteria of morality, then it is enough to check a little over 100 years later how much still exists, is used, and enjoys human respect out of whatever that government or that institution has made. (NOT without reason, e.g. out of all buildings over 100 years of age, mainly churches still exist and are used. After all, in typical situations all phases of their construction, starting from the decision making, through collecting the funds, and finishing with the erection, in past were carried out without breaking any moral criteria - for an example see the caption under "Fig. #G1a" and see item #D3 on the web page named cielcza_uk.htm.)
       In addition to this, the Bible (as well as some of other holy books inspired by God) is quite clear in explaining that e.g. to get to heaven in the next life, firstly we have to earn this by proving to God in this life, that we inscribed into our character the permanent habits of moral behaviour. After all, one does not need to be a guru to deduce that if God forgave all sins and would let everyone into heaven, than same wicked people, who today unleash hell on Earth, would also turn heavens into a similar hell. Thus, our primary goal in this life on Earth, becomes the proving to God during the tests and trials on morality, to which we are continually subjected, that we already etched permanently into our character enough moral habits to be able in heaven to coexist harmoniously with other people admitted in there and to implement in discipline and in the manner required by God the job that in the future God will be entrusting to us in heaven. Not without a reason in the Bible God warns us that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to get into heaven, and also warns us that from the whole of this vast number of people, who in all times lived on Earth, to the heaven will be permitted only 144,000 of the most "righteous" people - both of which warnings are explained in a bit more detailed way in item #C4 from my web page named immortality.htm, and in item #I1 from my web page named quake.htm. (Notice here, what item #A3 from my web page god_proof.htm explains on the topic of moral degeneration under the influence of wealth, and on upbringing in wealth and in prosperity, as well as explains how God uses the method of upbringing called the "principle of reversals" - i.e. explains the method described, amongst others, in item #B1.1 from the web page named antichrist.htm and in item #F3 from the web page named wszewilki_uk.htm. In addition, note also here that the biblical expression "righteous" does NOT coincide with the today's understanding of this word and in the Bible it is used to describe a person which today we would call "pedantically morally acting person" - for more details about these "righteous" people see the abovementioned item #I1 from my web page named quake.htm.) In other words, yet another immense loss that both, the whole humanity, as well as each individual human is to experience due to ignoring of objective research on the mechanisms of action of true morality required from the people by God, and also by disregard to learning of morality, is that the overwhelming majority of people living on Earth are NOT going to get into heaven - in spite of deceptive promises of many of today's religions. (E.g. from my rough estimates described in both abovementioned web pages stems, that to heaven get only about 4 people out of every million people who have lived on Earth.) Thus the most important own asset that is wasted due to immoral behaviour, is a waste of our own lives by denying ourselves a chance that after the final judgment we get a new immortal body and a new, great, infinitely long life.
       Of course, there is a whole ocean of scientifically verifiable facts, which confirm that God fulfils exactly what He said. Only that just that old official "atheistic orthodox science" do NOT intends to deny its doctrinal foundations through scientific verification of these God's indications. Also religions do NOT even attempt to scientifically verify them. Thus, so far the new "totaliztic science" is the only one, which in the extent of its limited resources and capabilities, such scientific verification is carrying out. Unfortunately, whatever this new "totaliztic science" established, still does NOT reach to the most people. After all, the results of its research are still ignored, while its publications are still blocked and ridiculed. However, in spite that the majority of people are to ignore whatever is explained here, it is still worth to promote the truth. After all, to those who deserve it, this truth somehow arrives. So let us list here at least the most tangible categories of evidence, which confirm that in the long-term action God strictly and severely punishes every manifestation of immorality, while handsomely rewards every moral behaviour (and thus, that only those people may count for any future with God, who prove to God, that they permanently inscribed to their characters morally correct habits of conduct). Here are these categories:
       (1) The Bible inspired by God. In fact, the Bible in many different places assures us with various words, that immorally acting people (the "wicked ones") are to be punished, while morally acting ("righteous") - rewarded. For example, amongst others God promises in the Bible, that for as long as some human settlements are inhabited by at least "10 righteous" people (i.e. by at least 10 "pedantically morally acting people"), these settlements will NOT be destroyed by any disaster. As I described it in items #I3 to #I5 from my web page named petone.htm, during the time of my living in Petone, one amongst such human settlements turned out to just be the township where I currently live. No wonder, that my personal verification carried out for many years, showed that numerous disasters of various calibre, which spread destruction in towns neighbouring to Petone, bypassed and left untouched the township of Petone itself. (Thus, it is quite a significant loss, that my proposal described, amongst others, in item #J1 from the web page named quake.htm and addressed to a different New Zealand city named Christchurch (which is repeatedly shaken by devastating earthquakes) was NOT accepted. In this proposal I suggested that with the help of residents of Christchurch I will also check on their city the work of this Biblical promise from God.)
       (2) Folk wisdom (expressed e.g. through the content of proverbs and legends). Independently from the Bible, about the inevitable punishment for immoral behaviour of people clearly warns us also our folklore, for example consider the Polish proverbs of the kind "easy come, easy go," or "God tardy but fair", or consider legends on the fate of immoral cities Vineta and Salamis described in items #H2 and #H3 from my web page named tapanui.htm.
       (3) Scientific findings of the philosophy of totalizm and the new "totaliztic science". The fact of unavoidable punishment of every immoral human behaviour is also confirmed by the results of research carried out by the philosophy of totalizm and by the new "totaliztic science". For example, as it has been proved already by the research of totalizm and the new "totaliztic science", all the short-term benefits obtained by any intellect (e.g. by any person, institution, country, etc.) in the result of an immoral behaviour, in the long-term operation of the moral mechanisms are always made void and replaced by the disadvantages that represent their exact opposites. Examples of various well-known cases investigated by totalizm and by the new "totaliztic science", whose long-term consequences confirm such punishment for immorality, are provided e.g. in item #C4.2 from this web page, while are described in more detail, amongst others, in item #J1 from another of my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm, and in item #B6 yet another my web page named p_instruction.htm.
       (4) Ordinary logical deduction. Each of us can imagine, whom he or she would let into heaven, if, for example, God has entrusted him or her with the highly responsible task of choosing people whom the heaven should host. As it turns out, the responsible completion of such a task would be extremely difficult. After all, we know about too large number of people from around us, that if they are given immortal bodies and the ability to do whatever they want, then they would quickly change the heaven into a kind of hell. Therefore, if such a choice of candidates for heaven from our environment is made in a way truly responsible and objective - meaning by NOT being influenced by the cronyism or family ties, but only by the actual character of these people, then it turns out that we know really very few people whose character qualifies them to stay in heaven. (For example, I am ready to bet that if someone in his or her life was able to get to know, let us say, a million of people, probably with a difficulty would be able to find among them four, about which he or she could objectively indicate and justify on the requirements described in the Bible, that actually they deserve to go to the heaven.) Notice here, that the additional achievement of this type of logical analysis is that it immediately realizes to us "why" people whom we objectively would NOT allow to heaven, on a daily basis are plagued by so many problems, failures and misfortunes of life, while the people whom we ourselves would allow to heaven, every day lead completely different lives - i.e. incomparably happier and more fulfilled than these others, although not necessarily richer or more famous.
       (5) Our own analysis of the life-fates for humans which we know well. Each one of us knows a few people from the environment, whose exceptionally immoral acting (unfortunately, only in rare cases - particularly moral behaviour), qualify to the category of persons, which in the long-term operation of moral mechanisms deserve the especially exemplary punishment (unfortunately, only in the increasingly rare cases - deserve a special reward). So, if one examines their fate, then it turns out that actually in the long-term work of moral mechanisms such a punishing (or rewarding) is taking place. For example, I once carried out the analysis of the fate of my school colleagues, about which from the time of our youth I knew, that already then they stopped the listening to the voice of their conscience, so that their characters already in those days of my youth become known as particularly hopeless cases of immorality - which have NOT gave any hope for the future improvement. As it later turned out, all those my classmates who already in their youth silenced out the voice of their conscience, died at a relatively young age (their fates are described in items #C7 and #D3 from my web page named god_exists.htm and in item #G1 from my web page named will.htm).
       Thus, since both, the religions as well as the present official science, had already abandoned the teaching of morality, and never carried out a reliable scientific research on the true morality required from the people by God, the last discipline devoted to the true morality remains the new "totaliztic science", in the spirit of which this web page is written. This "totaliztic science" still is trying to teach us about the immense significance of moral principles for both, our personal lives, as well as for the fate of all mankind. It still provides us also with the increasingly deeply verified results of its research on the mechanisms of morality, and on the methods by means of which in our own behaviour we can utilize these mechanisms for expanding our personal happiness, for conducting highly fulfilled lives, and for avoiding the waste of our time, effort and resources to act immorally, the beneficial effects of which acting will later have to be cancelled (the fact of immorality of which actions, unfortunately, still cannot be recognized by us on the basis of any written sources apart from the Bible and the totaliztic publications).
       So how we can stop wasting of our life, time, effort, and resources, through the learning of how to convert the most of our decisions and actions into the decisions and actions which are completed in accordance with the criteria of morality? Well, firstly we have to learn how to recognize that the decision or action that we are going to take breaks any moral criteria, means is "immoral". After all, majority of the violations of moral criteria results from human ignorance - means from the absence of knowledge in humans that they just act immorally, from their lack of knowledge to what such immoral behaviour leads, and from their lack of motivation to learn how to act in accordance with the criteria of morality. In turn how to make such a diagnosis, apart from the Bible teaches us also the philosophy of totalizm and the new "totaliztic science" - including this totaliztic web page, starting with its item #C4.2. Then we also need to learn how to convert an intended decision or action that proved to be immoral, into the morally correct decision or action with the same final goal. How to make such a conversion, it also teaches the philosophy of totalizm - e.g. see volume 6 of my newest monograph [1/5].


Part #B: How "morality" is defined in two existing models of our universe:

      

#B1. Two basic models of our universe, i.e. (1) the model of the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date (i.e. the universe occurred by an accident and is ruled by accidents) and (2) the model of the new "totaliztic science" (i.e. that the universe was created on purpose and is ruled by superiorly intelligent God):

       From the everyday life we know, that if we want to learn thoroughly about something, then we must "look at it" from at least two different "directions" or from two so-called "approaches". This is because looking from just a single direction (approach) we see "at the most" a half of this something. For example, looking at some building just from the front, we still do NOT know what is on the back of it. On the other hand, our official science (frequently called also the "atheistic orthodox science") on everything that surrounds us looks just from a single and always the same approach, by philosophers called "a posteriori" means "from effects to causes". This means, that such a science learns "at the most" a half of truth on that something. In order to learn also that "still missing second half of truth", people would need to officially acknowledge also completely different science, which would be "competitive" towards that "atheistic orthodox science" to-date, and which would look at everything from a completely opposite approach by philosophers called "a priori" means "from the cause to effects" or "from God understood as the most primary cause of everything, to the surrounding reality that represents effects of actions of that God". In fact, since 1985 exists already just such a new science which is researching the reality from that opposite "a priori" approach. It is called the "totaliztic science" and it really is "competitive" towards official science to-date, i.e. "competitive" towards that science which we learn in schools and on universities and which some call "atheistic orthodox science". (Notice that the world "competitive" is written here in "quotes" because in fact both these sciences mutually complement each other and both are in service of humanity - although, as so far, the new "totaliztic science" was forced to act almost in "conspiracy" because representatives of that old "atheistic orthodox science" which so-far held the absolute "monopole for knowledge" persecute it viciously, sabotage it, fight out, criticise and "close its mouths" on all possible ways available to them, i.e. they do with it exactly what is known from e.g. economics that holders of "monopoles" always do to their "competition".) The philosophical and scientific foundations of this new "totaliztic science" are described in items #F1 to #F3 of a separate web page named god_exists.htm. These foundations are based on the so-far ignored by the official science the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity. This is because that theory has proven formally that "God does exist" - and thus it undermined the truth of so-called "Occam's razor" which provides philosophical foundations for the old "atheistic orthodox science" to-date.
       Each one amongst both above sciences forms its own model of our universe that is unique for it. For example, the model of the official human science to-date is based on the so-called "theory of big bang" and "expanding universe". In turn the model of the new "totaliztic science" is based on the everlasting existence of always moving liquid called the "counter-matter" which displays attributes of a "liquid computer" and in which with the elapse of time evolved a self-aware program that us people call God, and that later created from this counter-matter the entire separate physical world and man. But in order to NOT stretch the patience of the reader, I am NOT going to describe here these models nor prove why the model of the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date is erroneous while the model of the new "totaliztic science" is correct. I only inform here, that about the "Big Bang" or about the "Occam's razor" that form foundations of that old model of the official science one can read in internet - because there is in there a huge number of publications on these subjects. In turn about the "intelligent counter-matter" and about the "model of the universe" that result from the existence of it, most comprehensively one can learn from the volume 1 of my newest monograph [1/5] - which is disseminated in internet free of charge, and which is a kind of "official textbook" for the "totaliztic science".
       Both above mutually "competitive" sciences, and also justifications why only one model of the universe that they created is the correct one, are already presented on a number of totaliztic web pages - for example see item #C1 of the web page named telekinetics.htm, item #A2.6 of the web page named totalizm.htm, items #F1 to #F3 of the web page named god_exists.htm, item #A4 of the web page named god_proof.htm, item #C5 of the web page named bible.htm, item #B1 of the web page named tornado.htm, item #J2 of the web page named pajak_jan_uk.htm, item #A2 of the web page named healing.htm, subsection H10 from volume 4 of monograph [1/5], and descriptions from several further web pages and publications of totalizm. So there is no need to again elaborate these here.


#B2. How the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date defines the (true) "morality" in the universe that come to existence by an accident and is ruled by accidents:

       In the "Oxford English Dictionary" (1 volume, Oxford University Press, Oxford OK2 6DP, UK, 2007, ISBN 978-0-19-920687-2) - which is considered to be one amongst most authoritative dictionaries in the world, on page 1835, under the word "morality" is provided the following definition of "morality": "the doctrine or branch of knowledge that deals with right and wrong conduct and with duty and responsibilities; moral philosophy; ethics; moral principles or rules". The publishing of the above definition in that authoritative dictionary means, that it is a kind of "standard" for the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date. Although some academic textbook or some lecturers may add or take away some less significant words from the above definition, generally this definition is a full representation of what "morality" is considered to be by the old "atheistic orthodox science" to-date. Thus, the type of morality described by the above definition, should be called the "scientific morality" (more information about such "scientific morality" provides item #I5 on the page named petone.htm and item #E2 on the page named totalizm.htm). In turn, those people who practiced such "scientific morality" in Poland were called "martinets" ("służbistami" in the Polish language) - for the essence of their ideology see item #L3 from the web page named cielcza_uk.htm.
       The most vital attribute of the above definition of morality is that according to it "morality" is "an idea introduced by people". This means, that according to it supposedly: (a) "morality" does NOT originate from anything else than people (e.g. "morality" does NOT originate from God nor from "laws of nature"), (b) "morality" does NOT have independent from people "standards of morally correct behaviours", (c) do NOT exist any "phenomena of nature" that would indicate or confirm which behaviours of people are morally correct and which are immoral, and (d) no-one independently from people "guards" the "morality" nor makes sure that people actually behave morally e.g. through serving to them "rewards" for "moral behaviour" and "punishments" for "immorality". In other words, because according to this definition supposedly "people invented morality", this definition contains also a suggestion, that as time elapses, people (i.e. "scientists" and "politicians") will be able to "invent also for themselves" a completely different "morality". For example, instead of becoming increasingly perfect through fighting out their vices and temptations, in that "new morality" which people can "invent" for themselves and introduce to life in the future, they simply are to "sanction" these vices and temptations and announce that following them is already "moral" (instead of previous being "immoral"). This seems to happen already now. For example, New Zealand already now banned parents from disciplining their children (and even makes this disciplining punishable by imprisoning) - as this is explained in item #B5.1 from the web page named will.htm while is commented in sub-items #C4.2 and #J2.4 from this web page. Furthermore, it introduced also the law regarding "civil unions" in which it allows that homosexuals can marry each other - in spite that e.g. the Bible quite clearly bans practicing homosexuality (for examples of this bans from the Bible see item #B5 on the web page named seismograph.htm or item #B2.1 on the web page named mozajski_uk.htm). In turn e.g. in Australia is opened legally an internet forum which persuades people to marital unfaithfulness - in spite that this unfaithfulness is banned by 7th God's commandment. The above persuades to undertake serious analyses, whether the definition of "morality" which is disseminated by the old "atheistic orthodox science" to-date is actually correct, or is rather highly wrong and misleading for people.
       At this point it should be emphasized, that (as this is explained in more details in item #B6 below) the "scientific morality" described in the above definition shows significant differences when compared with the "true morality" required from the people by God, i.e. the one evaluated and then punished or rewarded by God, the definition of which is provided in item #B5 from this page. One amongst the most important of these differences lies in the fact that the "scientific morality" in its very definition requires us to obey orders and the requirements of our superiors and to abide the imperfect human laws - even if these stand in direct conflict with the commandments and requirements of God - as this is explained comprehensively in item #L3 on the page called cielcza_uk.htm. But because for example in item #G3 from the totaliztic web page named prophecies.htm is illustrated that the vast majority of today's laws is already opposite to the commandments and requirements of God, the requests of today's "scientific morality" to implement these immoral laws is an equivalent of ordering people to act immorally. But it has already been documented with certainty, that every immoral human action is punishable with a strong "kick" that God serves to immoral people still in this physical life of theirs, in proportion to the level of their immorality - which fact is documented in detail e.g. in item #C4.2 from this web page, in items #G1 to #G8 frm the web page named will.htm or in item #I5 from the web page named petone.htm. Thus such ordering by the "scientific morality" to act in life in the opposition to the commandments of Almighty God, illustratively can be compared to recommending that each of the people by his action "challenged a horse to a duel for kicks".


#B3. Whether the definition and understanding of "scientific morality" disseminated by the old "atheistic orthodox science" are agreeable with the reality in which we live, and thus correct, or rather mislead us because they reveal to us at the most a "half of truth":

       If the "randomness" - which is inherent in the definition and understanding of "morality" disseminated by the old "atheistic orthodox science", was consistent with the reality in which we live, then the attributes which this "morality" would have to display in our universe, would also be ruled by "accidents". In other words, in such a universe created by an "accident" and ruled by "accidents", also the morality would have to be the "accidental morality" - which would be characterised by the following features:
       1. The work of such an "accidental morality" would NOT be governed by any regularities or laws. Thus e.g. the same actions would completely at random show different moral classifications. There would be no any uniform moral rules and principles that could be applied to all human actions and situations. There could NOT exist any standards of morality. There would also be NO indicators of morally correct behaviours, such as "moral field", "moral energy" or "moral laws" - discovered only recently by the philosophy of totalizm and described more comprehensively on a separate web page named totalizm.htm and also in sub-items #C4 from this web page. Of course, there would also be NO way that such subjects as "ethics" or "philosophy" could be formulated and lectured.
       2. "Morality" ruled by accidents would NOT support the development by people of the understanding and models of "justice", "honesty", etc. This is because how one could develop and define these concepts when the same behaviours would have accidental and each time completely different moral meanings. Thus people would NOT know what these concepts actually mean. Also, people would NOT be able to be either right and just or honest, etc.
       3. People affected by outcomes of such "accidental morality" would NOT have "conscience", "proverbs", "folk wisdom", "moral tradition", etc. After all, these features are based on the repetitive rules which govern over morality and which humans noticed, and the existence of which was detected by generations of people that lived on the Earth.
       On the other hand, when one analyses the universe in which we live, then it turns out that this universe displays a complete opposition to attributes of "accidental morality" listed above that would need to exist in the universe ruled by accidents. This leads to the final conclusion, that "the definition of 'morality' which was developed and is disseminated by the old so-called 'atheistic orthodox science' is significantly 'twisted' and is NOT agreeable with the 'moral laws' which rule over the reality in which we live". After all, according to what is documented in items #B1 and #B2 from the web page named changelings.htm, the reality in which we live was created and is ruled with an iron hand by omnipotent God, while as such it significantly differs from the reality created and ruled by "accidents" that is promoted by the old "atheistic orthodox science". In the world created and ruled by God, this is God who developed moral principles and requirements so that these support His goals, and this is God who forwarded these principles and requirements to people for obeying (while obeying of them He executes from people with an "iron hand"). Therefore, people who practice this twisted "scientific morality" imposed onto the present humanity by the old and incompetent "atheistic orthodox science" risk that they become severely punished by God - e.g. that according to the principle of "survival of most moral" explained in items #G1 to #G7 of the web page named will.htm, they die prematurely in relatively young age. After all, this twisted definition of morality as "moral" announces erroneously activities which in the "true morality" (means in the morality subjected to the judgement and punishment by God) are clearly indicated as highly immoral. (As examples of just such erroneous qualifying by the twisted definition of morality, consider "homosexuality" described in item #B4 from the web page named antichrist.htm, which the scientific and twisted definition of morality declares to be "moral", while God qualifies in the Bible as highly immoral and revolting, or consider "polygamy" described in item #J2.2.2 from the further part of this web page, which the scientific and twisted definition of morality declares as "immoral", which God qualifies in the Bible as a moral behaviour which is allowed for people.) So in order to learn a different (correct) definition of "morality", which truly reflects our reality, we need to learn the definition developed and disseminated by the new "totaliztic science" and provided in item #B5 below.


#B4. What we should know about this "reversed approach" to morality of the new "totaliztic science", and why it reveals the "missing second half of truth":

       As it is explained by item #B1 of this web page, the new "totaliztic science" researches the reality around us from the opposite approach by philosophers called "a priori", means "from the cause to effects". In this approach everything, thus also "morality", is defined as originating from the "superior cause", means from God. Only that opposite to the existing religions, new "totaliztic science" is aware of the fact that God does NOT support laziness and stupidity, therefore in spite that in holy books, such as the Bible, He gave to people "starters of the knowledge" about morality, actually He expects that people with their own effort and objective research find out by themselves what really "morality" is, and how one should lead a moral life. Therefore, the new "totaliztic science" does NOT wait - as this was so-far done by religions, until God gives to people for free the entire knowledge about morality, without of the need for people to laboriously work out this knowledge by themselves, but this science starts to objectively and intensely research "morality and God" and earns the knowledge about morality with own effort and own contribution of work. In turn, all knowledge that it managed to establish on the subject of morality and principles of moral living, this new "totaliztic science" explains in the philosophy of totalizm and the philosophy of parasitism that it created and developed. The most vital aspects of this knowledge are summarised here on this web page.


#B5. How the new "totaliztic science" defines the (true) "morality" in the universe intentionally created and intelligently ruled by superior God:

Motto: "People stubbornly ignore the 'true morality' enforced by God, God restlessly illustrates to people that NO-ONE is allowed to ignore the 'true morality'."

       The new "totaliztic science" recommends to use the following definition of (true) "morality": 'the true morality is the "level of obedience" with which a given "intellect" fulfils commandments and requirements imposed onto humans by God, which commandments and requirements are unambiguously expressed by God with the aid of various "standards of morality" (such as the Bible, the human organ called "conscience", etc.) and with the aid of numerous 'indicators of morally correct behaviours' (such as the "moral field", "moral energy", "moral laws", etc.), and which actual fulfilment by people is judged by God and "rewarded" or "punished" with an iron consequence - while manners of fulfilment of these commandments and requirements are revealed to us by two modern philosophies called the philosophy of totalizm and the philosophy of parasitism - which taken together teach people truly "moral" principles of leading their lives'.
       Of course, the above definition - as every human finding, can also be expressed with the use of various other words or sentences. A part of these sentences perhaps can improve it even more and allow to express with it even better the essence of "morality". Furthermore, this definition is too long for us to be able to remember it in its entirety and repeat it for the everyday use. Therefore, for our own use, or for discussing it with other people, one can benefit from simplified versions of that definition, e.g. from the one stated here in the introduction to this web page, or the one discussed in item #A1 of the separate web page named totalizm.htm. Such a simplified version of the above complete definition reflect the essence of it already in e.g. the following formulation "in the world ruled by God, morality should be understand as the strictness with which someone fulfils God's commandments in the everyday life" (or in the formulation presented in the introduction to this web page). But the addition to such simplified versions of this definition should be our understanding that in order to "persuade" to people the obedience of "morality", God created and gave to people various standards and indicators of moral behaviours (e.g. conscience, Bible, moral field, etc.), and also that God consistently uses "rewards" and severe "punishments" to reinforce moral behaviours in people - only that in order to not break our "free will" this reinforcing He carries out highly "discreetly" and with the fulfilment of so-called "canon of ambiguity" (described, amongst others, in item #C4.1 of this web page).
       The above definition is immensely important. After all, it informs quite clearly that "morality" is formulated by God and that God makes sure that people obey it pedantically (and do NOT ignore it). On the other hand, the error of a too-light, unserious, and misleading treatment of "morality" by the official human science to-date, which the science still failed to repair, causes that the humanity currently is in the situation of a "war with God" about "morality". In turn, how "wars with God" typically finish, this for the city of Christchurch in New Zealand is described in item #G2 on the web page named prophecies.htm, while for many other immoral decisions and actions of people (e.g. for immoral introduction of antibiotics, pesticides and the theory of relativity to a common use) explain, amongst others, item #J1 on my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm, or item #B6 on my web page named p_instruction.htm. Therefore, in present times, our civilisation pays for ignoring the enforcement of morality with immense suffering and deaths of numerous people punished for being immoral, and also pays with the devastation of nature, cities, and social lives, which were treated too lightly by decision makers that believed in the impunity of their immoral actions. Thus, in the vital interest of every person lies now to repeat this definition of morality to his or her close ones, and thus to gradually restore the moral behaviours to our civilisation. In turn the restoration of morality has the potential to return harmony, peace, and prosperity to the humanity.
       The correctness of the above definition of "morality" is confirmed by a number of various facts and phenomena. Each one amongst these facts and phenomena contradicts also the correctness of the to-date definition of "morality" (i.e. the one from item #B2 above) - disseminated by the official human science. Therefore, the entire next "part #C" of this web page is going to be devoted to the presentation of the most vital examples from the large body of evidence which documents that the definition provided here is absolutely correct, and documents that God really enforces moral behaviours of people.


#B6. Differences between the "true morality" described by the definition of the new "totaliztic science" and the "scientific morality" described by the definition of the old "atheistic orthodox science":

Motto: "Wherever for the attention of people competes more than one idea, over there also appears a form of competition and a form of widening of differences."

       On this web page it is stated that in modern times the moral side of behaviours of subsequent individuals can be described by as many as three different definitions of "morality". The oldest of these behaviours can be called the "true morality" - as it is the one which is required from the people by God, while which is made aware to people through the content of sacred books inspired (authorized) by God Himself (such as the Christian Bible), through the whispers f conscience, and recently also through the recommendations and findings of the philosophy of totalizm. The definition of the "true morality" is presented in item #B5 from this web page. Another type of human behaviour can be called a "scientific morality". This one depends on compliance with the requirements and orders invented by various present atheistic scientists, and then imposed onto people by laws formulated by present politicians. This "scientific morality" is defined in item #B2 from this web page, and also in item #L3 of the web page named cielcza_uk.htm. Note, however, from item #I5 of the page called petone.htm, that God treats this "scientific morality" the same as a version of "immorality" - as it does NOT comply with God's commandments and requirements. The third variant of human behaviour is a simple "immorality" which most obviously is "practiced" by all followers of the so-called philosophy of parasitism. After all, the person practicing it "do not respect any laws or requirements, unless to the respecting them they were somehow forced". It means, that this principle of human behaviour is reduced only to indulging in own desires, inclinations, whims, deviations, etc. Each one out of these three types of "morality" has fundamental differences with respect to the others. It is therefore worth to learn these differences. In the case of highly immoral philosophy of parasitism, these differences do not even need to be explained, because they are defined by tendencies, moods, desires, wishes, etc., of a given practitioner. However, in the case of two other kinds of "morality", their mutual differences are more sophisticated. Therefore in items that are listed below I will explain the most vital differences between the "scientific morality" and the "true morality". Here they are:
       1. Period of validity. The today's "scientific morality" is constantly changing and is just a "temporary" - means valid only in present times, before scientists do NOT change it to something else. After all, this morality is constantly changing, as more and more scientists have come to different conclusions on the kinds of conduct that are accepted in a given time. For example, through practically the entire twentieth century, open homosexual relationships were considered immoral. But in the early twenty-first century these relationships were considered to be officially permitted and even laws were passed that allowed homosexuals to have 'legally blessed", so called "civil unions". In turn during the second decade of the XXI century, instead of keeping a different name for homosexuals who are, after all, the couples of the same sexes, these "civil unions" were even officially called "marriages" - in spite that the age-old name "marriage" means "union between two people of different sexes capable of procreating their offspring". Due to such deviations rising in the "scientific morality", from the legal point of view, these "deviant" gay marriages, in the twenty-first century have become NO different from the marriages of women to men.
       On the other hand, the "true morality" is timeless. Moral principle which prevailed in it 2000 years ago during the writing of the Bible, apply also in the twenty-first century. Homosexual unions are having therein a different name than the capable of procreation unions of women with men. For example, in the Biblical "Book of Leviticus", verse 20:13, they are called a disgusting thing" - for more information on this subject see item #B4 on the web page antichrist.htm.
       2. Purpose to which it serves. Required by God "true morality" has been designed by God in such a manner that it is to serve a divine purpose as well as possible - especially to serve the God's goal of "pursuing the knowledge" described in item #B1 from the web page named antichrist.htm, and also the described in item #A4 of this web page goal of developing in people such permanent attributes of character, which in the next life allow them to harmoniously coexist with others and with God in heaven, without turning this heaven into a "hell", into which various immoral wickeds managed to turn the present Earth. On the other hand, the "scientific morality" serves to various imperfect goals of people who execute the control over its formation, for example, serve the increase of income of these people, the consolidation or extending of their power, the elimination of the public outrage over some immoral human desires - e.g. to homosexuality, etc.
       3. Stand towards human imperfections. The "true morality" is so designed by God, that its practicing forces people to work on the elimination of their weaknesses. By contrast, the "scientific morality" is designed in such a manner that the practicing of it causes the approval by the society the human "imperfections" and taking these imperfections as "perfections" (e.g. consider the changes of human attitudes towards wealth, greed, perversion known as "homosexuality", etc., caused by the development of the "scientific morality").
       4. Consequences for the social inequalities and tensions. The "true morality" is so designed by God, that the practicing of it eliminates social disparities, reduce tensions between communities, promotes peace, etc. However, the accidentally changed "scientific morality" causes the opposite consequences, namely causes the increase in social inequalities (for example, increases the gap between the poor and the rich), increases social tensions (e.g. causes periodic outbursts of civil wars, revolutions, and even wars between nations), promotes group aggressiveness, etc.
       5. Treatment of justice. The "true morality" is so designed by God, that the practicing of it increases the fairness and equality of treatment of all people. In turn the "scientific morality" works in reverse - i.e. it increases the injustice under the pretence that it increases the righteousness.
       6. Consistency of requirements. The "true morality" executed from people by God, has only one requirement, namely "in your life always act morally". In order to make easier for people to obey this requirement, God introduced a number of so-called "indicators of moral correctness" (e.g. "moral field", "conscience", etc.) described more comprehensively in items #C4 to #C4.6 of this web page, or in item #B1 from the web page named changelings.htm. In turn "scientific morality" introduced so many requirements, that in present times are unable to comprehend and obey all of them NOT only ordinary people, but even professional lawyers and politicians. For example, according to this "scientific morality", in our lives we should obey: laws of the country, laws of local authorities, principles of loyalty and discipline, know and obey ethical requirements of our job, keep professional secrets, respect even the most wicked superiors and obey their orders, observe privacy of other people, do NOT offend deviated and crazy, NOT cause noise, not ignore police, insure own properties, not catch fish in specified waters, etc., etc.
       7. Who ensures the observance. In the human nature is a tendency to not follow any "morality." Therefore, if no-one is to keep eye on people, then they slip down into practicing the highly immoral philosophy of parasitism. Unfortunately, the societies are unlikely to survive if they consist only of people who practice this immoral philosophy. Therefore, the compliance to these two basic varieties of contemporary morality must be guarded by someone. The "scientific morality" is watched over by the laws prevailing in a given country, as well as by the atmosphere and trends in that country. For example, the requirement that we always need to do whatever our superiors and the authorities require from us, is enforced by employers, police, courts, social pressure, wives, children, etc.
       Whereas the compliance with the "true morality" oversees just God alone. However, since all acts of God are obeying the so-called "canon of ambiguity", also this divine supervision of the compliance with requirements of "true morality" for many people seem to be "ambiguous". But in fact it does exist and if someone do study it carefully, then it turns out to be the most realistic - for more details see e.g. item #C4.2 from this web page, or e.g. item #G1 from the web page named will.htm.
       8. Type of penalties for non-compliance. If a person fails to comply with the "scientific morality", then he or she is threatened with all kinds of penalties - depending on the aspect which is NOT observed. For example, a failure to comply with commands of superiors can cause a job loss, a breaking of the laws of the country may land a given person in a prison, etc. But if someone fails to comply with the "true morality", the typical punishment is always the same, namely, always in the long-term action of moral mechanisms all benefits that resulted from a given immoral behaviour are cancelled. Furthermore, every immorally acting person is condemned to "early death" - because God typically shortens his or her life by an amount proportional to the quantitative value of the committed "immorality" (as explained in item #G1 from the web page named will.htm or in item #B4 of the web page named antichrist.htm). In addition to this loss of everything that was accomplished due to immoral acting and to this "premature death", each immorally acting person must also experience the same kind of "immorality" which he or she has caused to other people - so as to fulfil the requirements of the "moral law" called the "Boomerang Principle" briefly described in item #C4.4 below on this web page.


#B7. "Problems" arising from differences between the "true morality" described by the definition of the new "totaliztic science", and the "scientific morality" described by the definition of the old "atheistic orthodox science", as well as the avoidance of these problems:

Motto: "Wherever there is a competition, one party may begin to resort to 'disallowed tricks'."

       The biggest problem arising from the differences between the two above moralities which currently are simultaneously required from people, is that many of the requirements of both these moralities are mutually contradictory, while simultaneously a failure to fulfil any of these requirements are severely punished. Thus, if one is to listen e.g. to the order of the "true morality" stating "do not kill a human" - then he or she should refuse to go into the army and to a war. At the same time, listening to the "scientific morality" requires from us the compliance with laws and orders of authorities, and it, amongst others, sends us to the army and asks us to kill humans during a war, or during ever increasing lately so-called "civil wars" and "revolutions". So, if for example someone decides to hear the God's command "do not kill your neighbours", he or she may be shot by his or her own countrymen for a lack of patriotism and for insubordination. But if someone is listening to orders of authorities "go to a war and kill those fellows who are dressed in uniforms of the enemies of your country", then God can kill him or her - according to the action of the "Boomerang Principle". So each person believing in God is constantly forced to choose in their lives, whether or not to implement orders of the "true morality", or orders of the "scientific morality". (For other example of a similar situation see item #B5.1 from the web page named will.htm.)
       Jesus commands with words discussed in item #C4.2 below, that people should intelligently seek ways of obeying God's laws without the simultaneous breaking human laws. So one can wonder whether the principle of acting described in item #L3 from the web page named cielcza_uk.htm, in fact is still the only developed by people so-far, and used in practice, general principle of avoiding the punishment by one of these two mutually contradictory moralities? After all, is not appearing that in the foreseeable future, neither the human official science nor the politicians suddenly began to introduce laws that would NOT be in a direct conflict with whatever omnipotent God requires from us.


Part #C: What facts confirm the correctness of the definition of "morality" that stem from "a priori" approach to research of reality by the new "totaliztic science":

      

#C1. The correctness of totaliztic definition of "morality" is confirmed by a huge body of evidence - only that to NOT destroy the human "free will", this confirmation is carried out by God in such a "discreet" manner that the "canon of ambiguity" is always fulfilled:

       In reality exists a huge amount of evidence, which unambiguously judges the correctness of both opposite definitions of "morality" presented in items #B2 and #B5 above. This huge body of evidence confirms, that the definition of morality developed by the new "totaliztic science" and presented in item #B5 above is absolutely correct. Simultaneously the same body of evidence indicates, that the definition of morality provided by the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date is completely wrong, and that the erroneousness of it introduces very serious consequences for many people - for example sometimes it even "costs lives" of these people who treat their "morality" too lightly.
       Because this wrong understanding of the concept of "morality" is so rich in consequences, and because for the wrong treatment of morality many people must die prematurely, in subsequent items of this "part #C" I am going to present the most vital body of evidence which reveals that only the abovementioned definition #B5 from the new "totaliztic science" is absolutely correct.


#C2. Commandments and requirements imposed by God on our lives:

       As this is explained in item #D2 from the further part of this web page, God created and maintains the humanity for a very concrete reason and goal - which is the pursue of knowledge. But in order this goal can be accomplished, certain conditions must be fulfilled. For example, people must be continuously inspired to carry out discussions and to seek truths; the having and expressing different views CANNOT be punished; discoverers, inventors, and those speaking the truth CANNOT be persecuted by other people (as persecuted is e.g. the author of this web page); the so-called "phenomena of nature" must have such a course that they can be explained on many different manners; people must live in mutual respect and love to others; must prevail peace; people CANNOT be hungry, oppressed or desperate; they must have the required time for philosophical deliberations and for searching for truth; etc., etc. As it turns out, all these conditions are fulfilled only when the significant majority of people lives in the highly "moral" manner - i.e. when they obey just these requirements and commandments of the "moral living" which God imposed onto all the humans.
       The need for the existence of specific requirements and moral principles imposed onto people by God is described and explained in items #C1 and #B4 of the web page named tornado.htm. It is also discussed below in item #D3 from the further part of this web page.


#C3. Body of evidence which confirms that God created and issued to people very clear standards of "morality" and "morally correct" behaviour:

       There are completely independent from people standards of "morality" and "morally correct behaviours". These standards are given to people by God in several different forms, e.g. in the "written form" expressed in the content of so-called "holy books" (e.g. in the content of the Bible) or in the "whispered form" continually offered to us as so-called "whispers of conscience". Additionally, these are later confirmed also by various historical events, course of wars, attributes of various phenomena of nature, etc. Therefore, these "standards of morality" CANNOT be changed or "re-interpreted" by any power-thirsty or "fame-thirsty" politicians, or by philosophers with over-inflated ego, or by scientists that try to replace God through the formulation of own principles of "pretended-morality".
       In sub-items that are to follow now, I am going to discuss most vital amongst these "standards of morality" given to us by God to be obeyed pedantically. Here they are:


#C3.1. The Bible as the primary standard of "morality":

       The Bible is (and always will be) the most vital, primary, and initial "standard of morality" that originates from God Himself.
       Only that, being written around 2000 years ago, the Bible uses the language and examples which today are already seen as slightly "out of date" in relationship ti present times. (E.g. whom today we call "workers" or "labourers" in the Bible are called "slaves".) Furthermore, in order to NOT support human "laziness" and "ignorance", God so formulated the Bible, that it only answers the question "what", but does NOT provide people with ready-made replies nor recipes for questions "why", "how", "what it stems from", "what confirms this", etc. Replies to these questions people must laboriously work out for themselves. In fact these replies are already worked out and disseminated amongst people by the new philosophy called the philosophy of totalizm.


#C3.2. The counter-organ of "conscience" which links directly with God practically every person, as an intelligent "one-way hot telephone line" which also continually whispers for us "God's standards of morality":

       Every person has a 'build-in" own brain a kind of "one-way telephone" that links this person with God. This telephone is called the "conscience". With the assistance of it, God in every life situation discreetly hints us which our behaviour is "moral" and which is "immoral". Therefore, e.g. practising a simplest version of totalizm, called the intuitive totalizm, boils down to simple listening to our own organ of conscience and then thorough doing what this conscience whispers to us.
       The conscience works correctly in all people. For this reason, many of so-called "atheists" frequently also benefit from its "whispers". In turn, because practicing the "morality" is the major criterion by which God judges later every person, these "atheists" who act morally because they listen to (and obey) whispers of their conscience, God treasures such morally acting "atheists" and places them incomparably higher that these immoral "believers" - who do NOT listen to whispers of their conscience and thus behave immorally.
       Unfortunately, the conscience can be deafen (stifled). Thus "immoral people" are these ones who chronically deafen whispers of their conscience. In this way many highly religious people also act highly immoral - simply these people deafen their own conscience. Of course, if they act immorally, they are punished - similarly as every other immoral person. After all, the basic criterion by which God judges people, and on the basis of which God serves to them appropriate "rewards" or "punishments", is the moral behaviour and the respect (love) of God, not the religiousness.


#C3.3. The philosophy of totalizm as independent, objective and current scientific "confirmations" of standards of "morality" that originated from God:

       Unfortunately, in spite that the Bible is the "primary" standard of morality which originates from God Himself, it was put together around 2000 years and until today its language, examples, and various expressions, become slightly old fashioned.
       Fortunately, in 1985 was developed the philosophy of totalizm which states practically the same as the Bible does - but it does it with modern (present) language and with the use of most recent examples and scientific tools for objective investigations.
       Totalizm is a very simple philosophy which has only one principle that must be obeyed. This only principle states everything that you do always do in a pedantically moral way. Of course, in order every person can implement this only principle, the philosophy of totalizm explains exactly "how", "why", etc., everything must be done in order to be "pedantically moral".
       In fact this philosophy of totalizm initially did NOT intend to reflect or confirm the Bible. This is because it was formed when the previously described Concept of Dipolar Gravity revealed that the universe is NOT build nor works as the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date teaches it. Thus, the formulation of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity forced the development of a new philosophy, which from the very beginning was named totalizm (but written with "z", not with "s"), which would teach people how they supposed to live in the world which structure and operation is defined by the Concept of Dipolar Gravity. With the elapse of time, by analysing the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, the philosophy of totalizm scientifically discovered regularities and laws that rule over lives of humans in just such a world governed by the dipolar gravity. As it later turned out, these regularities and laws are exactly the same as these ones which are described in the Bible. This is why the philosophy of totalizm is in every point agreeable with the content of the Bible in the area of the replies to questions "what", but in addition it also explains objectively "why", "where it comes from", "how", "which evidence confirms it", etc. As such, the philosophy of totalizm complements the Bible in all these matters which God did NOT wish to reveal to people for "free", but left them for the laborious working out by people with the appropriate contribution of effort, work and pain.
       Both, (1) the Bible, and (2) the philosophy of totalizm, originate from completely different sources, were formulated by completely different categories of authors, and were developed on completely different basis. However, both of them in their descriptions of "morality" arrive to exactly the same truths, principles and regularities ruling over this "morality". This in turn means, that "morality" is the objective entity, that CANNOT originate from people because it is superior in relationship to people, and is the product of true structure and operation of the universe in which we live, and that has the "standard" that is independent from people and results from principles of operation of this universe. The Bible commands that "in everything we always must base on statements of at least 'two witnesses' " - as this is explained more comprehensively in item #C5 on the web page named the Bible. Thus, if the Bible is this "first and primary witness" which persuades to us that we must live "morally", the philosophy of totalizm is this "second witness" which completely independently persuades to us exactly the same.


#C3.4. The philosophy of parasitism which also teaches "morality" but with the different method of "reversed logic", i.e. through revealing standards of "immorality":

       In item #B7.2 of the web page named seismograph.htm was explained that "morality" can be learned in two different ways, namely either (a) by showing how one needs to live "morally" - as this is done e.g. by the philosophy of totalizm or (b) on principles of the "reversed logic" - i.e. by learning or experiencing effects of acting "immorally" and to what this "immorality" leads people to. This second standard of "immorality", which depends on thorough illustrating what is the "immorality" and why God so vigorously fight it out and so severely punishes people who practice it, is the so-called philosophy of parasitism. This philosophy constitutes an exact reversal of the philosophy of totalizm described in previous sub-item.
       By the way, God Himself also uses both these methods simultaneously, to teach us morality. After all, independently from the Bible, which teaches us how one should live to be moral, God widely utilises towards people also the method of upbringing called the "principle of reversals" (the one described, amongst others, in item #B1.1 from the web page named antichrist.htm and in item #F3 from the web page named wszewilki_uk.htm), which illustrates to us quite well what immorality is all about and to what outcomes it leads us.
       Similarly like totalizm, the philosophy of parasitism also is a very simple philosophy. Actually, in order to practice it one does NOT need to learn it, but it suffices to just allow that we are ruled by our inclinations, desires, pleasures, addictions, etc. The essence of practicing the philosophy of parasitism expresses the following doctrine in everything that you do, do NOT obey any duties nor laws - unless you are somehow forced to obey them.
       At this point it is worth to emphasize, that people invented a huge number of various philosophies. But almost all of them contain similar views on morality and practically in nothing vital they differ from each other. This is because almost all of them are based on the "unwritten assumption" of their authors, that "morality is a human invention", and thus each one of them tries to introduce some own version of morality. On the other hand, in real life there is only one morality (this defined for people by God) and it is absolutely "non-negotiable". Thus people have only two options regarding morality, namely they can either (1) learn it and obey it, or (2) ignore it and disobey it. This is why from the point of view of God, there are only two philosophies, namely (1) the philosophy of totalizm - which boils down to learning and to pedantic obeying the requirements of God's morality, and thus for the practicing of which God rewards people, and (2) the philosophy of parasitism - which boils down to ignoring and to disobeying the requirements of morality given to us by God, and thus for the practicing of which God severely punishes every human parasite which adheres to this philosophy.
       We also need to emphasize here strongly, that people who are highly religious also frequently practice this punishable by God philosophy of parasitism. This is because the majority of today religions limit themselves almost completely to the public "worshipping of God", instead to obeying the God's moral requirements and commandments. However, in case of disobedience towards moral commandments and requirements of God, the religiousness of these people does NOT protect them from experiencing severe punishments for practicing this highly immoral philosophy of parasitism - the evidence of which we see e.g. in fates of some highly religious countries already saturated with the philosophy of parasitism (e.g, Pakistan or Afghanistan), and also in fates of some entire religions or churches - e.g. see items #C3, #C5 and #C6 from the web page named seismograph.htm.


#C4. The body of evidence which confirms that even for "atheists" God also created and make available clear indicators of "morality" and "morally correct behaviours" - of the kind of "moral field", "moral energy", "moral laws", etc.:

       Pity that these indicators of "moral correctness" and "morally correct conduct" so-far could NOT be detected nor described by neither religions nor by the old "atheistic orthodox science" to-date (i.e. by the science we still must learn in schools and at universities), and thus that it was necessary to create the philosophy of totalizm and the new "totaliztic science" in order to reveal these indicators to people and made them available for the use of general public. These indicators take on particular importance in the light of the principle of "survival of the most moral" discovered only in 2012, which may also be named the principle of "extinction of the most immoral intellects", and which is described in more detail, among others, in items #G1 to #G7 from the page named will.htm, item #B1 from the web page named changelings.htm or item #A2.7 from the web page named totalizm.htm. This principle reveals to us the fact, that for people who do NOT act morally, God shortens their life and causes their premature deaths at ages that are proportional to the assessed by God harm that their immorality causes against God's goals and intentions. Therefore below we will briefly review the most important amongst these indicators:


#C4.1. Everything that God does, He always do it in such a manner that it has "at least" 3 independent explanations - thus independently from the Bible, also God created also further objective indicators of "morality" and "morally correct behaviours":

       In order people could be "partners of God" in accomplishing the most vital goal for which God created humans, namely the "pursue of knowledge" (i.e. the goal discussed here in items #C2 and #D2), it becomes necessary that God allows every person to have own "free will" that enables this person to formulate own views on practically every subject and topic. Therefore, in everything that God does, He always incorporates attributes which give to it the character of a high ambiguity. The presence of such attributes is defined by the so-called "canon of ambiguity" (also called the "canon of indefinites") described more comprehensively, amongst others, in item #C2 of the web page named will.htm. (This canon states: "in the universe nothing can be fully unambiguous and deprived sources of all doubts, because then the people who confront it would be deprived the right to their own free will and the right to choose their own views and the path through the life". After all, God is the source and cause of everything that exists in our world. Thus everything that would be unambiguous and deprived of all doubts, would also unambiguously point at God, and thus would deprive people of the right to formulate own views and behaviours, means "free will".) Therefore into every phenomenon or event which God causes on the Earth, are incorporated attributes which allow it to be explained in at least 3 different ways. These at least 3 independent ways of explaining everything that God does, are described, amongst others, in item #C2 of the web page named tornado.htm.
       In order also "morality" could be explained completely independently from the fact of existence of God, and thus in order "morality" was also acceptable for people who do NOT practice the faith in God, God formulated a range of objective phenomena and indicators, which even for "atheists" point out the most moral behaviours. In sub-items that are to follow now, I am going to describe most important amongst these indicators.


#C4.2. The use of the moral field for an "indicator of the moral correctness" with the characteristics so secular and so scientific, that even for "atheists" this indicator can be accepted for comparing human actions with standards of morality that are objectively existing and independent from humans:

Motto: "The more countries approve and legalize the growing number of immoral human behaviours, the more life on Earth becomes similar to hell."

       A phenomenon, which from the point of view of moral mechanisms turns out to be the most important for our life, is the moral field. This field I already described relatively well on many totaliztic web pages, e.g. see items #H2, #D1 and #C1 on my web page named totalizm.htm, or item #J1 and the caption under "Fig. #I1" on my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm. However, in order to NOT force the reader to interrupt the course of reading of this web page, also here I quote one amongst several totaliztic definitions of this field (but notice that the same "moral field" can also be defined in a number of other ways, including ways that bypass the use of the word "God", and thus are acceptable for "atheists"). Here is this definition: the "moral field" is a sequence of discretely (discontinuously) occurring events and phenomena that God intelligently triggers at the moment when we plan and implement any our intention or action, and which by our mind are processed into the feeling constantly acting upon us, which in the case of us completing a morally correct action, in us induces discouragement, while in our environment induces emotional and physical resistance that opposes to the implementation of this action, while in the case of us completing an immoral action, the feeling encourages us to implement it, while in our environment induces situations that help us to complete it. A relatively detailed description of examples of just such discrete phenomena and events intelligently triggered by God during a period of nearly half of the year 2014, to form from them the moral field acting on my mind and my surroundings, is provided in items #N3 and #N4 from my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm. Examples described therein reveal the mechanism of formation of the moral field in the course of my NZ election campaign.
       In other words, the moral field is like an intellectual equivalent and a relative, to the gravitational field - which hinders our effort in all cases of, for example, climbing upstairs or climbing up the mountain, while which makes our descent easier in all cases of going down the stairs or down a mountain. However, there is also a lot of differences between gravity and the moral field. The most important of these differences are described, among others, in item #H2 from the web page named totalizm.htm. For example, one of such highly significant difference is that gravity always works in almost the same way, while the "moral field" in the short term works exactly opposite than in the long-term - which fact is explained a bit further below in item #C4.2.1. In its short-term action the moral field mainly has the goal to enable the examining and judging a given action and the person implementing this action. Thus, a short-term work of moral field is manifested most strongly immediately after we started the implementation of a given action, and then it gradually fades away. In contrast, only in its long-term work the moral field starts to generate the "moral return" that is due to the person or to the community for a given action and for the moral or immoral nature of this action. This "moral return", occurs only after passes the required so-called "time of return", means many years later - because it takes the form of either a response from the "Boomerang Principle", or a karmatic response, and thus it has yet to be properly prepared by moral mechanisms. For example, from my research to-date it stems, that in the case of actions taken by individual people, the "time of return" typically amounts to about 7 to 10 years. In turn for group intellects, e.g. for the entire countries or for all of humanity, in some cases, this "time of return" may come even around 10 times later. E.g., the return of karma for the implementation of slavery and colonialism typically began to emerge after about 100 years since such immoral actions were taken by a given country, while the long-term reply of the moral field for such immoral implementations as antibiotics, pesticides, or the theory of relativity, arrived only after about 70 years since their development and implementation.)
       The moral field has this feature that everything we do in our life, either immediately climbs us uphill, or immediately slides us down of this field. Namely, everything that is moral demands from us a laborious and difficult climbing uphill in the moral field. In turn everything that is immoral causes our effortless and pleasurable sliding down in the moral field. It is just because of such action of the moral field, that the actual truth is said to us by that popular saying stating that "everything nice in life is either immoral, illegal, or makes us fat" - a quote usually attributed to Dorothy Parker (this saying is highlighted on the web page with the "instruction", named p_instruction.htm - which describes my "playlists" with videos of totaliztic songs programmed for "smart" TVs from the Korean company "LG".)
       The new "totaliztic science" also determined that the "moral field" is a kind of invisible "dynamically shifting us back" primary field of intellectual nature (i.e. originally acting on our minds). Its operation is therefore quite similar to the action of gravity on objects suspended in the midair (e.g. on birds), because it requires a contribution of hard work even just to hover motionless in it.
       Because of this ability of the moral field to "dynamically shift us back", in this field we always must put continuous effort and work NOT only when we want to climb higher up, but even if we only want to keep ourselves on the same level and in the same position. The discontinuation of climbing uphill in the moral field causes that this field immediately shifts us back. The moral field is always so configured, that doing anything that is "moral" runs "uphill" in this field, while doing anything that is "immoral" runs "downhill" in this field. In turn, because this field is "dynamically shifting us back" - as it is also explained in items #D5, #I2 and #J1 from this web page, "not doing anything" still causes us to slide down in it. In other words, it works in a way that "doing nothing" is also a strongly "immoral" behaviour, and thus demanding a punishment. It is because of the existence of this "moral field ", that everything people do (or everything that they neglect to do while they should do it) always has a clearly defined "moral polarization" (i.e. everything is always either "moral" or "immoral"). For example, in item #A2 from the web page named pajak_na_prezydenta_2015.htm (unfortunately available only in the Polish language) is explained, that even some of the ways to do gym exercises (e.g. used as escapes to gyms from doing the real physical work for the benefit of specific people) also can be implemented in an immoral manner. It also this "moral field" causes that doing anything that is "moral" always in a short term requires putting into it our effort and work to overcome the short-term resistance of this moral field, while doing everything that is "immoral" in the short term is always pleasant and effortless. (This is just why so many people are practicing the immoral philosophy of parasitism, because being the highly immoral, always practicing this philosophy in the short term does NOT require putting into it any effort and is a source of immediate pleasures.)
       This attribute of moral field, that it imposes a definite moral polarity onto each human activity which we knowingly take (or onto every lack of action when it is needed), makes the moral field to be an excellent "indicator of the moral correctness". After all, in every life situation it is enough to determine whether a given our action climbs uphill, or slides downhill in the moral field, and we immediately get to know cognitively (i.e. we affirm this with our mind and knowledge), whether this our action is moral or immoral - i.e., whether when we complete it then in the long term we will be rewarded for it, or punished for it by the moral mechanisms. The existence of such an indicator is extremely important, because currently the life on Earth has become very complicated, hence the indicators which God originally provided in the Bible (e.g. 10 commandments) in many life situations no longer suffice for a growing group of people for an unambiguously determination in the cognitive manner, whether whatever is just planned to be done is moral or immoral (although independently from our mind, about the morality or immorality of a given action inform us also whispers of our conscience - but many people have forgotten already how to listen to these whispers). Thus, in an increasing number of cases, people do NOT listen to whispers of their conscience and they violate the criteria of morality, means they act immorally, because they do NOT realize the immorality of their actions - which, however, the lack of cognitive knowledge that one acts immorally does NOT protect anyone from being severely punished for breaking moral criteria (at which fact I already directed the attention of reader in item #A4 of this web page). After all, one of the most important goals of our life is the "pursue of knowledge" - for details see items #B1 and #B1.1 on my web page named antichrist.htm, while penalties for ignoring the obligation of such generation of knowledge are also to "persuade people" to further their knowledge. In spite of this, most people still think, that it is enough to NOT do what is prohibited by the "10 Commandments", and one already has acted enough morally. However, the truth is that virtually every human action can be carried out either in a moral manner, or in an immoral way - only that the current religions neither research this matter, nor they are going to inform us about it, while the official, so-called "atheistic orthodox science" is NOT intending to research and disclose of that fact - as I have already explained this in item #A4 from this web page. However, the today's modern life causes, that on a daily basis we encounter a huge number of situations and actions, about which without the use of moral field as an "indicator of the moral correctness" we cannot be able to established cognitively whether these represent moral or immoral decisions and behaviours of people. So let us list here at least some most troubling examples of such typical situations and action wrongly understood by people. Here they are:
       1. Taxes. When I discussed taxes during my election campaign described on the web page pajak_for_mp_2014.htm, the majority of my collocutors expressed the view that taxes are necessary. After all, they allow to built roads, hospitals and schools, equip army, etc. What these people NOT see, is that if one goes one step further and check e.g. how it is selected which roads should be constructed and what kind of contractors builds them, how well hospitals today are serving to ordinary taxpayers, what in those schools is taught, and what level of knowledge children of taxpayers are reaching, for what is used the army after it is equipped, etc., and also if we count e.g. for what we would be able to pay by themselves if we do NOT pay taxes, then we can begin to have doubts about the true "value for money" of many taxes we pay. In addition, the moral analysis carried out for taxes show that virtually all taxes imposed onto individual people violate various moral criteria, means are "immoral" - for more extensive explanation see item #T2 from the web page named humanity.htm. (The morally correct may be some forms of tax collected from companies and institutions.) In turn the most immoral out of all of taxes, are the ones called VAT or GST. Their effects on humans and on the economy can be compared to pouring sand into the gears of working machines. As the research of the new "totaliztic science" has shown, in a long-term action of moral mechanisms the punishment for immorality always turns out to be, among others, the cancellation of all beneficial consequences of a given immoral action. Because the money collected by the government in the form of taxes, are then used to finance various governmental projects, this practically means that the true punishment for immoral collecting taxes from individual people, is the waste by the governments of almost everything that from these taxes is later financed. This penalty is independently confirming my finding, which I already described in item #A4 from this web page - namely, that the majority of decisions of today's governments violates various criteria of morality, and thus in the long-term work of moral mechanisms the beneficial consequences of almost all government decisions are cancelled (eliminated).
       2. Songs. Not everyone is aware of the fact that many products of artists, for example songs, also cause significant harm to audiences - means also break various moral criteria. In November 2014 I started the search in YouTube for songs which would be morally unblemished (i.e. which by themselves do NOT break any moral criteria). I wanted to form from them several "totaliztic playlists" with song videos. But I was shocked to discover that there is so few of such morally unblemished songs, that it appears almost impossible to form from them several thematically oriented playlists - for details see my web page named p_instruction.htm.
       3. Antibiotics, pesticides and the theory of relativity. Moral field is quite clear, that the decisions of implementing all of these were (and still are) highly immoral. Explanation of "why it is so" is provided in item #J1 from the web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm. It is because those three scientific decisions and actions proved to be so highly immoral and already now they are three greatest "curses of humanity" served to us by the official science, that I made the effort to identify and warn the people what are the three greatest future dangers of shabby and immoral implementation of scientific achievements, which if are handled in an equally immoral manner then may also become equally great, if not even greater, future "curses of mankind". It also turned out that we already know what they are and on what may depend their future immoral implementation by the official science. So here they are: (1) Genetic engineering (GE) - which becomes a "curse of humanity" if sloppy and careless scientists produce and unleash a wind-pollinated GE organism, which turns out to be highly harmful and which taking back under control will turn out to be impossible. (Notice that such careless release of GE organisms, including GE maize, had already taken place on several occasions, eg. in NZ - this is why I would recommend that NZ and Australia is to be declared by UN the "GE free zone" before is too late.) (2) Telekinesis - it has the potential to become a serious problem if the humanity does not appoint an explicit "telekinesis free zone" (TFZ) prior to the introduction telekinesis into general use. This is because in the event of the spread of telekinesis all over the Earth, there will be no comparative area with which one could compare the consequences of its widespread use. Therefore, as the discoverer of "telekinesis" I have decided to declare the "telekinesis free zone", as described on the web page tfz.htm - after all, virtually everything can be done in a moral or in an immoral way. However, from the resistance which the "moral field" has been creating for the completion of telekinetic devices, it can be deduced that in typical cases the implementation of telekinesis is to be the morally correct decision and action - although probably in the future there will be also cases that someone starts to use telekinesis in immoral ways (the irreparable harmfulness of which use is to prevent the precise laying down my "telekinesis free zone"). (3) Time vehicles - their construction on Earth opens for people the opportunity to realize the so-called "imprisoned immortality", involving the repetitive shifting of people to the days of their youth as soon as they reach their old age. Unfortunately, if there is NOT introduced the requirement which will be implemented with the "iron consequence", that every shifting back in time to years of one's youth can only be done to people who already have accomplished a continuous state of the so-called "totaliztic nirvana", then the cumulative increase on Earth numbers of "grumpy old people" entered into bodies of young humans will create a social climate on Earth which under the name of "everlasting hell" is described in item #H3 from my web page named immortality.htm. In that social climate, practically all the inhabitants of the Earth would agonize each other and constantly make themselves as unhappy as if they lived in the real hell.
       4. Addictive principles of operation. In past factories were proud that whatever they produce is reliable and durable - hence it will serve to their buyers almost indefinitely. But then it turned out that this reliability and durability led the factory of "Volkswagen" almost to bankruptcy. Their cars "beetles" in fact turned out to be so good, that no-one wanted to buy new ones. At the same time the Japanese car factories, which did NOT hide that their cheap cars are produced only for a service life of about 10 years, earned fortunes. This caused a drastic change of tactics of almost the entire industry. It was at that time that was invented a lasting trend, which by analogy with the action of drugs can be called "addictive principles of operation". It depends on the fact, that currently an increasing number of products of industrial mass production is designed and built in such a way that they are like narcotics, namely that force their users into a cycle of endless acquisition of these products, or their components - e.g. to a repeated disposal of older versions of the product from a given factory, or the older part of this product, and repurchase of a newer version or a newer part of the product from the same factory. Of course, the driving force behind this trend is greed, which does NOT take into account the damage that it causes to the environment, natural resources of the Earth, the advancement of knowledge, human habits, health and wealth of mankind, and the like. What even more interesting, this trend NOT only has been implemented already for a long time to less-important products such as cardboard plates or plastic disposable spoons, but also to cars, television sets, electrical and electronic equipment, etc. Let us now review some of the most representative "tricks" used by various factories and manufacturers in the practical implementation of this highly immoral trend.
       4a. Hand drills and other electrical power-tools. In past the hand drills and almost all other so-called "power-tools" were powered from the electrical grid. However, they worked very reliably and for a too long period of time. So their manufacturers have invented their powering by batteries. This is because today's batteries are quickly ageing, and their electrical capacitance decreases rapidly. After all, so-far the humanity has NOT been developing anything significant enough for it to motivate the development of long-life batteries - i.e. such as would be the Oscillatory Chambers of my invention (such motivator to increase the lives of batteries could be solar systems described in the next example - but for now their development is blocked by electric monopolies, as described in items #A1, #B5 and #F3 from my web page named solar.htm). Owners of battery-powered tools are quickly so impatient because of the need to recharge them too often, that they repeatedly buy new batteries for themselves - of course, from the same factory as a given power-tool is. Thus, at present one cannot buy any longer e.g. a hand electric drill powered from the grid - as personally I realized it due to the futility of my own attempts to buy such a drill lately.
       4b. Battery-deprived domestic solar systems for the generation of electricity from the energy of sunlight. Solar energy is considered to be "clean", because it does NOT pollute our planet and eliminates dirty power plants. But smart managers of such dirty power plants quickly came up with an idea as to how, under the guise of promoting "clean" solar energy, force idealistic people to become additionally dependent on these dirty power plants. Namely, they came up with an idea, that if they manage to persuade those idealistic people to build for themselves solar systems without batteries that store electricity, then at nights, when there is NO sunlight, the owners of these solar systems will still need the services of these dirty power plants. In this way, there come up a situation that in many countries, the projects to build "clean" solar systems are now monopolized by dirty power plants, and these power plants build only the accumulator-deprived domestic solar systems, which additionally make even more dependent (instead of freeing) their owners from these dirty power plants. Thus, the moral field confirms here, that building such accumulator-deprived domestic solar systems, also represents a highly immoral decision and behaviour - for which in the long-term work of moral mechanisms people will be punished. The moral is only the installation in private homes the solar systems equipped with batteries. More information, including answers "why", is provided in items #A1, #B5 and #F3, from my web page named solar.htm.
       4c. The so-called. "smart" TVs. If one has a computer and a TV, then these impose strongly that someone should merge them both into one device. Thus, under the pressure of public opinion, the television companies began to build the so-called "smart" TVs, about which is claimed that they combine the quality of the TV picture with the capabilities of a computer. However, to support the trend described here for making members of public dependent on the television and computer industry, these "smart" TVs have a whole range of inconveniences and imperfections, the existence of which can be justified only by the human greed. For example, they already have a built into themselves a recording function for whatever is watched, but in order to NOT decrease the sales of video-recorders they have too small memories to accommodate in it even only just a single film, and in addition they do NOT allow to send a recorded programme onto any external memory. A list of immoral limitations and disadvantages of such "smart" television sets, which clearly result solely from human greed, is provided in "part #B" and in item #A10, from the web page named p_instruction.htm.
       4d. Medicines. We are used to believe that all medicines are good for people, because they heal. However, the truth is that everything, even the production of medicines and the treatments, can be made either in a moral or immoral manner. It so happens that in order to satisfy their greed, some pharmaceutical companies have come up with an idea, that if instead of producing medicines that heal diseases and thus terminate the profits of these companies, it is preferable to profitably produce medicines that only relieve the symptoms of the disease, and thus make the patients to take these medicines for the rest of their lives. That immoral trend of some pharmaceutical companies to produce mainly such addictive drugs, is described in items #I1 and #I2 from my web page named healing.htm. Lately, various "research" try to even convince people, that they should take continually old medicines as well - in spite that this old medicines used to heal and should NOT be taken all the time (e.g. consider the supposed "benefits" of continuous taking of aspirin).
       4e. Cars with immorally large engines. At the beginning of the 1980s, the passenger cars with largest engines were in NZ Fords with 2-liter engines. However, typical NZ cars still had then engines which displacement volume of the cylinder smaller than one litre. (I remember this fact very well, because as a newly arrived from Wroclaw University of Technology lecturer of mechanical engineering with interests in the direction of propulsion systems, who in Poland had a Fiat car with engine of 650 cubic cm capacity, after my arriving in NZ I spent a lot of time to study the differences between the state of the automotive industry in communist Poland and in capitalist NZ.) Unfortunately, cars of that time burned too little of gasoline to satisfy the greed of oil companies - which are constantly manipulating the automotive industry. Thus, in the following years, the capacity of the engines in NZ passenger cars grew rapidly, so that by 2014 (in December of which year I was reediting this item of the web page) the engine capacity in some luxury cars, for example GM and Chrysler (Dodge), had already exceeded 10 litres, while the new cars with a capacity of less than one litre, in 2014 could NOT be purchased in NZ at all. That is, only in the period of 30 years, the size (and thus also the fuel consumption) of engines in passenger cars increased at least 5-fold. In other words, the engines of some luxury cars in 2014 were already bigger than the engines of the most important battle tank "Valentine" used by the British Empire in the battles of the World War II - which tank is described under "Fig. #E1.3" from the web page named bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm. Of course, if we think about it, cars with engines larger than war tanks, at a time when the planet is dying from pollution and when the global oil reserves are coming to a complete exhaustion, do NOT allow to be described otherwise than as a provocative immorality.
       5. Destruction of mechanisms that teach people morality. Starting since the end of World War II, our civilization began to gradually destroy the mechanisms that taught morals and sustained morality among the people. Leading role in the destruction are the consequences of monopoly of the "official orthodox science" for knowledge and for education. Let us list here some of these mechanisms.
       5a. "Politicization" of religions. Instead of concentrating on fulfilment of the role that God has given to religions, leaders of various religions began to more resemble the politicians seeking to increase their popularity and influence. Although the methods of this "politicization" varies across religions, in each of them they caused changes that can be detected in almost all religions, and consisting of moving away from serving God and turning to serving for the political goals.
       5b. Raising children without disciplining them. In many countries, including NZ, in the name of a mistaken sense of supposedly being "good for kids", now are adopted the so-called "anti-smacking laws" - which forbid disciplining of children, and thus which turn into criminals parents that discipline their children. Meanwhile, the disciplining of children is greatly needed. After all, it develops and trains in children the habit of listening to the whispers of conscience. In turn, as it is explained, amongst others, in items #A4, #C4.6 and #C5.6 of this web page, as well as in item #G1 from the different web page named will.htm and in items #C7 and #D3 from yet another web page named god_exists.htm, children who do NOT learn to listen to the whispers of conscience die at a young age - in accordance with the principle of "survival of the most moral". More Information "why" this "anti-smacking law" is immoral, provides also item #B5.1 from my web page named will.htm.
       6. Situations when human laws are exactly opposite to the laws of God. The number of such situations is constantly growing. Their excellent example is this New Zealand "anti-smacking law" which is discussed in the previous example. Each one of these situations represents a "trap number 96" - after all, if one does what explicitly tell us the divine law, then one breaks human laws and is to be punished by human authorities and human courts, while if one does whatever requires the human law, then he/she breaks the laws of God and shall be severely punished by God. So how we should deal with such situations - Jesus explained this to us in the Bible with the following words: "Render therefore unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God" (see Matthew 22:21, Mark 12:17, Luke 20: 25). In turn the biblical descriptions of the circumstances in which Jesus spoke these words, clearly suggest that behind these words lies much more meaning than the Bible can afford to speak without being announced as "banned book" by all governments and all rulers of the world. After all, if the Bible ordered, for example: "God's laws take precedence over the laws of people, thus if human laws require something opposite to the laws of God, then always follow the law of God", then the Bible would encourage to civil disobedience - the effects of which would also be immoral because it would lead to anarchy and to the collapse of the rule of law. Therefore, when interpreting these words of Jesus to specific situations in life one has to use a dose of wisdom. For example, in the light of research of totalizm, these words mean in practice: in situations where a divine law and laws of human authorities are opposite to each other, do what God commands, but simultaneously do NOT break the precepts of human laws - so that instead of wasting your time, energy and resources on staying in prison, you could rather take care of the legal elimination of the differences between the content of human and divine laws through e.g. the promotion of knowledge and the truth on this subject, by publishing or disseminating explanations such as these here, by putting your candidacy for parliament or for the government, etc. In other words, Jesus commands in such collisions of laws to intelligently find such ways out of the situation that this do NOT expose us to penalties and persecution of the authorities because of some apparent violations of human laws, while simultaneously this way out of the situation also allow us to do discreetly what God commands. And there are always such ways out - only that one needs to use own wisdom to find them, because they do not reveal themselves to us. The philosophy of totalizm explained, that from every life situation there is at least one morally correct way out, by totalizm called the "highway through the sea" (for details on this "highway" - see item #J3 from the web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm). An example of one of many possible ways out of a similar situation, that do NOT demonstrate a civil disobedience yet complied with the laws of God, which the way out I have experienced in the days of my childhood, is described in item #L3 from the web page named cielcza_uk.htm.
       7. Thousands of other similar human decisions and actions, about which typically we assume without thinking that they are "moral", but which the moral field, and other "indicators of the moral correctness" in fact unmasked as "immoral". A lot of these wrongly qualified decisions and actions is discussed in various publications of totalizm. However, since most of them represent only yet another example of the use of any of the immoral "tricks" already explained before - I am NOT going to repeat them here anymore. For several such examples - see, among others, item #B6 from my web page named p_instruction.htm.
       What is most important, the moral field NOT only confirms the whispers of our conscience, and thus additionally allows us to establish in a cognitive manner (i.e. with our mind and knowledge), which decisions and behaviours are moral and which are immoral, but it also allows us to quickly decide what in a given situation should be done to turn them into morally correct decisions and actions. For example, one of the totaliztic ways to respond to developments of life situations says "always follow the opposite to what tells you the so-called line of the least intellectual resistance". The point is that what this "line of the least intellectual resistance" tells us, it is very easy to almost immediate determination in almost every life situation - for more details see item #A2.1 from my web page named totalizm.htm. So in order to act morally, it is enough to do something that is opposite to the precepts of this line - e.g. if this line pushes us to call someone an idiot, the moral behaviour is the reversal of such calling, means e.g. a polite explanation of whatever constitutes a given problem.
       The use of "moral field" as an "indicator of the moral correctness" has also this advantage, that its characteristics are so secular and so scientific, that can also be explained (although erroneously) as caused by "natural mechanisms" completely independent from God (e.g. as caused by the action of the human mind). Hence the use of "moral field" as an "indicator of the moral correctness" is acceptable even for "atheists". In the today's world, increasingly completely filled up with atheists and supervised by the monopoly of the old "atheistic orthodox science", it is a very advantageous feature. After all, it allows that the ordered to us by God moral laws were also accepted by atheists as a kind of independent from people and existing in the "nature" moral standards, and that at the end atheists stop of fabricating their own perverted "scientific morality" which is contrary to the morality dictated to us by God. (This "scientific morality" is described in more detail in items #B6 and #B7 of this web page.) After all, if atheists accept that in the "nature" are ready moral standards that are not susceptible to warping, then they may abandon attempts to create a different "scientific morality" dictated by someone's human whims and "pleases". In turn the acceptance of God's moral standards cease to generate their distortions, while the increasingly wide decision-making and acting done in accordance with the criteria of morality would reduce the number of penalties which for the immoral decisions and actions must now be served to communities and nations. In the result, this would bring peace to earth and allowed for a conformed building a better future for all of people - regardless of whether the builders of this better future are atheists or believers in God.
       Even a wider and more detailed explanation of what exactly is this "moral field" (and in other items also what is the "moral energy" and what are "moral laws"), as well as how this moral field affects us, is provided in items #H2 and #D1 from the web page named totalizm.htm and in item #B2 from the web page named parasitism.htm, and also in volume 6 of my newest monograph [1/5]. In turn the graphic illustration of short-term work of "moral field" in four most common life situations is shown in "Fig. #I1" from my web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.


#C4.2.1. The "principle of contradiction between the short-term and long-term effects of the work of moral field" - that also acts as an excellent "indicator of moral correctness":

       Moral field is the primary field very similar to the gravity field - only that instead on the physical masses, it acts on our minds. However, the work of moral field slightly differs from the work of gravity. The point is that gravity works much approximately in the same way in both a short-term and in the long-term. On the other hand, the moral field always in the long-term works completely contrary to its own work in the short-term. Namely, doing what is morally correct always in the short-term requires to overcome a clear and significant resistance of the moral field. So in a short-term the moral field works as if it tries to "punish" those people who do whatever is morally correct. However, in its long-term work the moral field always reverses the kind of its work when compared to how it worked in the short-term. Thus, e.g. towards the people who worked morally and hence whom in the short-term this moral like tried to "punish", in the long-term work the moral field always adds its "prize" to the fruits of actions of these people, who in a given matter acted morally correct. At the same time, towards the people who in a given matter acted immorally and hence whom in the short term the moral field as if tried to "help" by making their life and work easy and pleasant, in the long-term the moral field always severely "punishes" for previous immoral acting, by invalidating everything that has been achieved in the short-term with the help of the moral field for the previous immoral actions in a given matter, and additionally by escalating further the problems that this immoral action supposed to solve. This principle of moral field work is called the "principle of contradiction of the short-term and of the long-term effects in the moral field work". The detailed description of it, together with examples of its work drawn from the real life, is provided in item #J1 from the web page named pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
       Of course, the consequences that for outcomes of a given human action had that "principle of contradiction of the short-term and of the long-term effects in the moral field work", were noted by the folk wisdom a long time ago. Thus, already for centuries these consequences were recorded and disseminated to us in the form of proverbs. In the best way the work of this principle is explained to us by the old Polish proverb which tries to emphasize, that if effects of some human action initially feel as "bad", then after the elapse of "return time" these effects are to feel as "good" (and vice versa). This old Polish proverb states "out of something bad always comes something good" (in the Polish language: "NIE ma takiego złego co by na dobre nie wyszło"). In turn the reversal of this old Polish proverb states that "out of something good always comes something bad" (in the Polish language: "NIE ma takiego dobrego co by na złe nie wyszło"). Notice here, that each one of the above sayings illustrates only a half from the two-part work of moral field. But there are also proverbs which illustrate the entire this work - only that usually they relate to specific fragments of human lives. One amongst the best of these, which so-far I had opportunity to learn, is that Chinese proverb, the reasons for the truth of which I am explaining in item #B2 from my web page named antichrist.htm. It states "bad husbands always have good wives, while good husbands always have bad wives". These my explanations I should also complement with the information, that opposite to laws of physics, which simulate the behaviours of "stupid nature", the moral mechanisms do NOT hide, that they are ruled by the wise and omni-knowledgeable God. Thus the severity of their work is always selected appropriately to the attributes of every individual person. Therefore, for example, in relation to people, who learned already the work of moral mechanisms and who try to NOT break moral criteria in everything that they do, outcomes of work of e.g. moral field are NOT so severe, as they would be in relation to people who do NOT know about the existence of moral field - and thus in which this moral field tries to direct the attention to its existence and work. This in turn indicates another benefit from the learning and obeying moral criteria - namely towards the people who know and obey the work of moral mechanisms, moral field eases the severity of its short-term resistance during the implementation of morally correct activities, and also eases the severity of bad consequences from long-term outcomes of good deeds carried out by these people.
       Consequences of the abovementioned "principle of contradiction in the short-term and in the long-term effects in the moral field work" are so repetitive and so decisive, that they can be utilised as yet another perfect "indicator of the moral correctness". This is because, for example, if we notice that whatever we just are doing is met with a significant resistance from the "moral field", then this means, that our action is morally correct and thus if we only feel that we are able to overcome such resi