is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
"There came a man
who was sent from God;
his name was John.
He came as a witness
to testify concerning
that light, so that
through him all men
might believe. He
himself was not the
light; he came only
as a witness to the
light. The true light
that gives light to
every man was coming
into the world. He
was in the world,
and though the world
was made through him,
the world did not
recognize him. He came
to that which was his
own, but his own did
not receive him. Yet
to all who received him,
to those who believed
in his name, he gave
the right to become
children of God — children
born not of natural descent,
nor of human decision
or a husband's will,
but born of God.
The Word became flesh ..."
(Quotation from the Biblical Evangel of St.
Welcome to the web page which presents answers, justifications,
and evidence based on my research and concerning the most
frequently asked questions about God and about matters related
to God. Everything that is presented on this web page results
from the research carried out according to findings of a secular
philosophy named "totalizm". I am Jan Pajak (my christian name
"Jan" represents the Polish translation of the old Biblical name
which in English translates as "John"), and I will be your narrator
for the explanations presented here. I personally believe that
I have all qualifications, preparation, authority, and mission
that are required to answer such questions. (My qualifications
and preparation for providing answers to questions about God
I am going to explain below in item #A2 of this web page.) Here
questions in matters related
to God highlighted with a blue colour, and also my answers
provided right below them.
Introductory information about this web page:
What is the goal of this web page:
The aim of this web page is to provide
answers to questions about God which we most frequently ask ourselves
or others. The replies that this web page provides do NOT represent a
point of view of an individual person, or a single religion. This is
because answers provided on this web page have the ambition to
become the most objective scientific replies on the subject of God that
are possible to receive in present circumstances of Earth. They
are based on findings that result from scientific research carried out
within the most moral, modern, secular, progressive, peaceful, and
constructive philosophy on Earth named
Thus in fact they represent official replies of this philosophy to given
Notice that replies on this web page
are formulated in exactly the same manner as the philosophy of
is formulated. This means, that they not only provide an answer for
"how actually is" according to findings of totalizm, but also
are explaining what totalizm established about "why is just like
this - instead of being completely different", and in addition they
indicate "what evidence" totalizm is able to provide to confirm
that really is like the replies state, not completely different. If
for some reasons the complete presentation of all three above components
of a given answer (i.e. "how", "why", and "what evidence") is impossible
in humble conditions of this web page, then a given answer will indicate
where in the main publication of totalizm (means in monograph
one can find the additional extension of explanations to the information
What me, i.e. officially Dr Eng. Jan (John) Pajak,
while courteously - Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
(for details see e.g. item #K5 on this web page),
qualifies to provide answers for questions about God:
"He made my mouth like a sharpened sword, in the shadow of his hand he hid me; he made me into a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver."
(Bible, Isaiah 49:2)
There is a whole range of factors which quite
unambiguously indicate, that I have the required
qualifications for providing answers to questions
about God listed below. Let us review at least
some most important of them. And so, I am
a scientist by profession, passion, and fate.
So I have the required formal training to
provide replies that I give with the certainty,
far-sight, and precision that is required for
presentations of results of scientific research.
I publicly defended my degree of the "doctor
of technical sciences" at the university which
at that time was practically the best in the world -
as justified in item #E1 from the web page named
So I practically went through the "trial of fire"
regarding my ability to carry out scientific
research, regarding my estimates of quality
level that is imposed on the results of such
research, and regarding my public defending
the results accomplished during the research.
In my professional career I accomplished the
highest level, i.e. the position of a full university
professor. This in turn means that my scientific
accomplishments were appreciated also by
other professional scientists. I am the creator
of the most moral, modern, secular philosophy
on the Earth, called
(the one spelled through "z"), the creator of the
new science called the "totaliztic science" which
philosophical foundations are based on totalizm and
which is defined in items #C1 to #C6 from the web page
and also the creator of the revolutionary
theory of everything named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
from which directly originates the moral philosophy
of totalizm, the new "totaliztic science, as well as
the formal proof for the existence
of God described on this web page.
I also identified and explained main
attributes and principles of the philosophy
of morally decadent creatures. It is called
This philosophy is practiced by
all those ones who in their lives
increasingly deviate out from the
rules imposed on people by God,
before the justice is served to them
accordingly to the principle of the
of most immoral" described
e.g. in items #G1 to #G5 from the web page
Thus, I personally contributed
countless amount of research
and thoughts to the subject of
determining the existence of God,
and also His attributes, methods
of action, etc. This means that,
as people are saying, "I know what
I am talking about". NOT without
reasons, I am the first scientist on
the Earth, who has proven formally
and scientifically the existence of
God, and whose proof, in spite of
numerous attempts by various atheists,
was never undermined and thus all time
it remains valid and in power. So in
support of what I am claiming I have the
required and very tangible evidence.
Furthermore, I have been given something
by God, that is not given to every person.
Some people would call it a "task"
or a "mission" which I have to carry
out on Earth, others would call it
the "fate", "destiny", or just a
"coincident". But whatever name
one would use to describe it, the
preparation of this web page about
God is an inseparable part of it.
More details about the course of my extraordinary
life, my qualifications, scientific research, and
this "mission" which I am currently completing
on Earth, can be learned from subsection W4
in volume 18 of my newest scientific monograph
marked [1/5] - free copies of which can be
downloaded from this web page via the item
in "Menu 1" from the left margin of
this web page. A brief summary of my
life is also provided on the web page with
my autobiographical note, i.e. the page
about me (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak).
A list of miracles which took place in my
surroundings, and thus which I saw with
my own eyes, is provided in item #H2
from the web page named
In turn about a kind of miracle,
with the use of which in 2007 God
nominated me to be a full professor
at a renown university, I wrote in
subsection #A4 of a separate web page about
Wszewilki of tomorrow.
This web page does NOT describe the
same God which is described to people
by various religions. Means, under the
name God this web page does NOT
understand a being of the human statue,
which lived on the Earth in ancient times,
and which has the knowledge and capabilities
that many times exceed the knowledge and
capabilities of people. This web page describes
a different God that is omni-powerful, omni-knowledgeable,
and omni-present - the nature, capabilities,
and characteristics of which are described by the
theory of everything named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
This omni-powerful "totaliztic God" can be
defined in the following manner:
God is the gigantic, self-aware, thinking, and intelligent
program, which evolved naturally in "counter-matter"
(means in the primary carrier of intelligence of
the universe), which resides in this counter-matter,
which in a software, dynamic, and hierarchical
manner forms from this counter-matter everything
that manifests itself in the entire universe, and which
intelligently governs everything that happens in the
There are huge differences between the interpretation
of God disseminated by religions, and the above
secular and scientific definition of God developed by the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and by the moral
philosophy of totalizm
which stems from this concept. These differences
are going to be explained gradually on this web
page. However, if we would like to indicate here
the most vital of these, it is that religions interpret
God as a "being" with human-like shapes and
attributes. In turn totalizm defines God as a
gigantic "program" which self-evolved awareness,
which resides in a kind of "liquid computer"
called "counter-matter", which in a software
manner forms from this "liquid computer"
practically everything that exists in the entire
universe, which itself has no shape although
it forms from itself all shapes of the universe,
which knows everything about everything that
He is aware it can be known, and which is the
source of everything. Thus, according to totalizm
everything that exists in the entire universe is
just one amongst infinitive manifestations of this
intelligent counter-matter and these natural programs
which are parts (or components) of God. Furthermore,
for that reason, the existence of this totaliztic God
can be formally proven with the use of scientific
methods. (A brief description of the formal
scientific proof for the existence of God is provided
in item #B3 below. In turn extended descriptions
of that formal scientific proof, complemented with
photographs and with additional body of evidence,
are presented on a separate web page
god_proof.htm - containing compendium of proofs that God really does exist.
I highly recommend having a look at that web page.)
But if one analyses thoroughly the origins of the
indicated above interpretational differences, then
it turns out that these have the source in the present
(erroneous) understanding of terminology used
in old religious descriptions, NOT in these descriptions
themselves. As it turns out, old religious descriptions
explain God exactly the same as it is done by present
totalizm - only that religions do it with the use of currently
outdated terminology - as it tries to explain to us item
#C6 on the totaliztic web page named
Thus, if someone takes the trouble of translating the sense
of ancient religious terminology that describes God into present
scientific language, then it turns out that the religious
descriptions of God state exactly the same as the totaliztic
definition of God - only that they do it with the use of a
different terminology and rather outdated comparisons.
Let us provide here an example of just such a
comparison of already translated essence of old religious
statements. In (5) from item #C12 of the web page
is explained, that the Biblical Hebrews, 11:3, states, quote:
"... the universe was created by God's word, so
that what can be seen was made out of what cannot be seen."
In turn totalizm states that the "natural 'program' of God
so configures the invisible for people 'counter-matter',
that everything that we see is created from that invisible
'counter-matter' " (notice here that what the present science
calls "program" or "information", in times when religions were
created was called "word"; while what in past was called "invisible"
totalizm currently calls "counter-matter"). Of course,
totaliztic web pages contain a large number of findings
similar to the above, from which it stems unambiguously
that "the essence of statements of religions and totalizm
is exactly the same - in spite of differences in terminology
with which this essence is expressed" (for still another
example of a similar vital finding - see item #C1 from the web page
Why it is worth to learn what the philosophy of
explains about God:
In present times many people make the use
of excuse, that official Earth's science -
popularly called the "orthodox science",
was unable to prove the existence of
God. They utilize this incompetence
of the science, to completely cease
the observing of moral obligations
and requirements which religions
placed on our lives in the name of
God. But these people forget, that
the orthodox science has a long
tradition of making errors and telling
untruth. After all, this science is famous
that it is forced to deny every now and
again everything that it stated before.
What even more interesting, the philosophy
of totalizm managed to catch the orthodox
science on one of such fundamental errors
of inexpressible consequences. This error
is pinpointed by a relatively new
theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
described on a separate web page. In turn this
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
indicates unambiguously that God in fact does
exist. In addition, it allows to prove formally
the existence of God. The philosophy of
that stems from this relatively new theory,
is actually the philosophy which undermines
the truthfulness and competence of the orthodox
science in matters of God, and even formally
proves the existence of God. Therefore it is
worth to learn the statements of this philosophy -
if not for anything else, then just because
many claims of religions into which the
orthodox science stopped us to believe
lately, can actually be true. Therefore if
someone confused by present orthodox
science stops taking these statements under
consideration, then it may have very serious
consequence for the future of this person, and
one day such a person may be very sorry.
In other words, it is worth to learn statements
of totalizm about God at least to have a chance
of make decisions about God on basis of
reliable knowledge and research which
totalizm explains, not just on base of someone's
one-sided opinions or denying, which sometimes
originate from irresponsible propaganda programs
shown in biased television.
A rational approach suggests, that in all very
important matters we should always seek
a so-called "second opinion". For
example, when one doctor recommends
an operation and cutting, it is always worth
to ask the opinion of another doctor so that
this other explains to us the matter from his
or her point of view. The matter of the existence
of God and obeying in our lives moral laws
which this God imposed on us, belong to such
very important matters. After all, God is this
superior being who with a single blink may
create or destroy entire galaxies. In addition
He is this superior being who one day is
going to judge us and to prepare a verdict
designating our fate. It is a bit risky
and unwise to ignore someone like that.
Yet, a large majority of people in matters
concerning God relies exclusively on
opinions of a single "expert" of a human
origin (i.e. either the orthodox science,
or their own religion). But such a single
human "expert" may be at wrong, or in
some matters may have a hidden agenda.
For example, people can be intentionally
manipulated by some powers, that independently
from the level of development, humanity
is NOT allowed to disseminate officially a
definitive truth about God. After all, due to
such a lack of knowledge about God, individual
people can be subjected by God to various
"tests" on their devotion and on their ability
to personally acquire the truth about God.
The philosophy of
represents just such a second independent
"expert", the opinion of which is also worth to
learn. So for this "second opinion" it is really
worth to learn what totalizm have to say, and
then to consider in one's own mind what one
thinks of it. This web page constitutes a summary
of the most essential findings of totalizm about God.
Replies to most vital questions regarding God:
Does God exist:
God for sure does exist! After all, totalizm has proven
formally His existence with several different scientific
methodologies (e.g. see item #B3 below).
In turn, every formal scientific proof has this
to itself, that it is the most close to truth and
to objective reality, from everything that at a given
point in time is known to us. Because these formal
scientific proofs of totalizm for the existence of God
were not undermined by anyone so far, they maintain
their merit and should be considered in our thoughts
and actions. They conclusively indicate that God is
equally real and tangible as everything else around us.
In case someone would like to have a look
at a formal scientific proof for the existence
of God, it is published in subsection I3.3 from
volume 5 of the slightly older scientific monograph
copies of which can be download completely
for free from the item
in "Menu 1" visible on the left margin of this web
page (it is available in several different formats).
In turn subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of the
newest edition of monograph
(just in the process of completion), contains
a complete presentation of another version
of this proof. This new version is briefly repeated
in item #B3 below. This new version proves
the existence of God with the use of methods
of mathematical logic.
Which obvious and tangible evidence in our reach totalizm indicates as able to confirm the existence of God:
We all look for some sort of convincing
evidence that this superior intelligent being which by religions is
called God in fact does exist. As it turns out, we already discovered
(by pure chances) a multitude of such evidence. Only that for various
reasons We do not treat it as such evidence. This is because in order
to accept it as evidence for the existence of God, it is necessary
to have a previous knowledge where this God resides (i.e. we need to
have a knowledge about the location of the "counter-world" described
in item #J2 below), what is the origin of intelligence of this God (i.e. we
need to known what are intellectual attributes of the "counter-matter"
described in item #J2 below), how this God communicates with people, etc.
In turn all this knowledge was provided only by the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity and by totalizm that stems from it.
Numerous examples of obvious and
tangible evidence for the existence of God are indicated and thoroughly
interpreted in volumes 6 and 5 (means in chapters I and H) of
It is where the reader should look for a more thorough analyses
of it. But in order to not leave this reply without at least
indicating here most common samples of this evidence,
I am going to list here three examples. These are:
ESP. The Concept of Dipolar Gravity states, that this thinking
substance named the "counter-matter", which in reality is the
carrier of the superior being called here God, has a custom of
replying to every question that someone addresses to it (means
it works like me). People since ancient times ask questions
addressed to someone unspecified, and in fact they receive replies.
This commonly known process of asking intelligent questions and
receiving intelligent answers, in the most popular form is called
"divining pendulum" or "radiesthesia". More general form of it
is called "ESP" (from "Extra Sensory Perception"). So in fact
diving pendulums, as well as all known forms of ESP, are nothing
else, as a direct exchange of information with this intelligent
substance which is the carrier of God. Thus, divining pendulums and
ESP are one of most common empirical observations, which document
to us the existence and the intelligent operation of God. Only
that for various reasons we so-far were unable to understand them
as replies that originate from this intelligent substance from the
"counter-world". (For more details about principles of operation
of divining pendulums and ESP see subsection I8 from volume 5 of
Animal instinct. It is worth to recall, that animals also
have a version of ESP. In animals this ESP is called "instinct".
On Earth various "animal geniuses" are known, in which this
"instinct" is so powerful, that they are capable of correct
solving problems that sometimes exceed capabilities of minds
of many people. Of course, such intelligent action of "instinct"
of animals would NOT be possible, if animals do not receive their
replies from this intelligent substance called here God. Thus
"animal instinct", or more specifically the rare cases of it
that allow some animals to solve logical problems that exceed
intellectual capabilities of many people, is a next tangible
evidence for the existence of God. (Descriptions of examples of
such "animals geniuses" and examples of manifestations of the
highly logical component in instincts of animals, are contained
in subsections I8.1 and I7 from volume 5 of monograph [1/4].)
Kirlian photographs. This religious "other world", by totalizm
and the Concept of Dipolar Gravity named the "counter-world", is
separated from our world by an impenetrable barrier. So no
periscopes or telescopes allow us to have an insight into it.
However, there is a technique which we call the "Kirlian photography".
It allows to photograph what is contained in this "counter-world".
Means this "Kirlian photography" in fact reveals images from the
world occupied by "God father". Only that so-far people did not know
about this. So they formulated various wild speculations about
what actually this photography is showing. The most convincing
experiment with the assistance of which the Kirlian photography
proves to us the value as a "window to that other world", is
known under the name of "ghost leaf effect". In this experiment
a new and still alive leaf is cut in half, and then the Kirlian
camera photographs only a half of this leaf. But on the photograph
after processing an entire leaf is visible. Researchers of this
shocking phenomenon were wondering where the image of this lacking
half of the leaf is coming from. Finally they come to a conclusion,
that it must be a "ghost of this leaf" (hence the name for this
experiment the "ghost leaf effect"). So if we think for a moment,
this experiment with the "ghost leaf effect" actually proves to us
conclusively, that independently from the visible space of "our world",
there is also additional invisible (for human sight) space of the
"counter-world". It is this space of the "counter-world" that God
resides in it. We even have already a research device, i.e. the Kirlian
photography", which allows us to have an insight into this "counter-world".
(For more details about the Kirlian photography and the evidential
value of it, see subsection H1.1.1 in monograph [1/4]. In turn the
"ghost leaf effect" is described more comprehensively in chapter
C of treatise [7/2].)
Genetic code. This code is in fact a kind of language.
In turn every language must be developed and used by an
intelligent being. Genetic code is discussed in more details
in the next item #B3, and also on a separate web page about
Electromagnetic waves. These belong to a category of waves
which usually is called "transverse waves". In turn such transverse waves
can be created only on the border of two media. So in conditions
in which electromagnetic waves propagate across the universe,
the only explanation for this nature of electromagnetic waves is
that they are formed on the border between our "physical world" -
in which we live, and the so-called "counter-world" - in which God
lives. The significance of the transverse nature of electromagnetic
waves as another evidence for the existence of God is additionally
emphasized by the so-called "red shift" in light from distant stars -
which does NOT originate from the "Doppler Effect" as this is
misleadingly told by present astronomy. More about the evidential
value of electromagnetic waves and about the meaning of "red shift"
is explained in items #D2 and #D2.1 of a separate web page
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
How the formal scientific proof of
for the existence of God was formulated,
and whether this proof is binding for us:
The first formal scientific proof for the existence
of God was published in subsections I3.3 to
I3.3.3 from volume 5 of scientific monograph
[1/4] "Advanced magnetic devices"
in 2000 (means quite a long ago).
In fact this proof was repeated three times
in the indicated subsections, each time
completed with a different methodology of
scientific proving. This in turn illustrates
that the scientific proving of so obvious
matter as the existence of God, can be
carried out not just on one, but on many
entirely different ways.
The scientific proof that God does exist
is for us equally binding as all other
scientific proofs - for example as the
proofs that the Earth is spherical, or
that sides of a right-angled triangle
fulfill the Pythagoras equation.
For our own good we should rely on
indications resulting from this proof
in everything that we do. After all,
if we do not consider it, then we
undertake actions which run against
of what God requires us to do. In turn
for standing against the being so powerful
as God, inevitably not very pleasant
consequences are awaiting for people.
In turn if we consider in our lives indications
resulting from this proof, then in almost
everything that we do we are inclined to
make corrections for whatever God expects
from us. This in turn is the key to future
reaping fruits and rewards which God
lavishly gives away to these ones who
implements his requests.
In the second semester of 2007 by some strange
act of God I was granted the privilege of giving
a series of lectures from the mathematical logic on a
A "by product" of these lectures was that to three
previous versions of the formal proof for the
existence of God completed before with the use
of physical methods, I could add another version
of the formal scientific proof for the existence
of God which this time is completed with the
use of methods of mathematical logic. Because
this proof is short, I am quoting it below for the
use of these readers who would like to get familiar
with it, or wish to check the validity of it. However,
I would still encourage to reach for further
information regarding it, which can be learned
either from items #G2 and #G3 of the web page named
or from subsection I3.3.4 in volume 5 of my newest
(disseminated free of charge, amongst others via
this web page). The base propositions of this
formal scientific proof for the existence of God
stem from so-called "genetic codes", the more
extensive description of which codes is provided
on web pages named
So here it is, the formal scientific proof for the
existence of God completed with the use of
methods of mathematical logic:
"God does exist".
"Genetic code displays all attributes of intelligent codes and
according to the Shannon's Theory of Communication all
codes are versions of languages. All languages are
formed by intelligent beings.
The creation of a single "language of genetic programming" which
would be capable to program and to express with genetic codes
all attributes for the huge number and variety of living
creatures that populate the Earth, required the work of
either superior being of a supernatural knowledge,
power, and efficiency of God, or a multitude of unanimously
cooperating with each other human-like intelligent
beings of capabilities and efficiencies similar to these
of humans. The fact that attributes of countless living
creatures which populate the Earth were programmed
and expressed with the use of a single and always the
same, coherent "language of genetic programming",
completely eliminates the possibility that genetic codes
of creatures from the Earth were programmed by a large
number of unanimously cooperating with each other
human-like creatures of capabilities and efficiency similar
(Explanation complementing this set 2 of premises:
The history of development of languages and codes proves,
that the large crowd of human-like creatures, which use
a language or a code, NEVER is able to unanimously
cooperate with each other, therefore with the elapse of
time such a crowd always gradually introduces numerous
variants to the grammar, vocabulary, structure, etc., of the
language that it uses. Therefore a large crowd of human-like
beings which would work on the development of life, similarly
like a purely random evolution, would either eliminate
completely the use of genetic codes, or in case of
continuation of the use of such codes, it would
gradually introduce completely different structures
and contents of these codes for each species
of living creatures.) (3)
God does NOT exist, or does exist. The use by God of a single
and always the same coherent "language of genetic
programming" for all creatures that populate the Earth
eliminates completely the possibility that God does NOT
The first basis proposition is to be transformed with
the use of tautological form of the method known
under the name of "hypothetical syllogism". This form
can be written as [(p =>q) && (q => r)] => [p => r],
in which the assertion "p" says "genetic code displays
all attributes of intelligent codes", while the assertion
"q" says "according to the Shannon's Theory of
Communication all codes are versions of languages",
in turn the assertion "r" states "all languages are
formed by intelligent beings". The transformation
of these propositions implies the conclusion that
"the genetic code was formed by an intelligent
Accepting this previous conclusion for an assertion
in the next phase of inference, and using the method
of "disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which
can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q, we obtain a
next conclusion which states that "a single, coherent
'language of genetic programming' which appears in a
huge number of creatures that populate the Earth
must be formed by a single superior being with a
supernatural knowledge, power, and efficiency of God".
The last couple of propositions allows us to derive
the final conclusion with method called the "disjunctive
syllogism", the tautological form of which can be
written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q. In this form the assertion
"p" says "God does NOT exist", while assertion
"q" states "God does exist". Thus the final conclusion
states "God does exist"!
The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively
proves the truth of the theorem that "God does exist".
* * *
For the use of these readers who are NOT
familiar with the notation that is applied in the
above proof, I would like to explain that
symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent
"assertions" utilized in this proof as logical
variables. In turn symbols "&&", "||", and "=>"
mark logical operators "and", "inclusive or",
and "implies" (if ... => then ...").
It is also worth to mention about the validity of
the above proof. Because this proof utilizes
exclusively tautological forms of subsequent
methods, it remains valid for all values of
variables it uses. Thus practically it is error-proof.
If someone would like to undermine it, he or
she would need to undermine first the validity
of mathematical logic. In turn this logic is a
foundation for countless mathematical proofs
which with a large success were used by the
effective and precise discipline of mathematics.
Thus, since so strong proof for the existence of
God finally we were able to develop, it is worth
to check now whether we live according to
this proof. After all, the faith in God to-date
is replaced by it with the reliable knowledge
and certainty of the existence of God.
At this point I should inform, that extended descriptions
of the above proof, complemented with photographs
and with additional body of evidence, are presented
on a separate web page
god_proof.htm - containing compendium of proofs that God really does exist.
I highly recommend having a look at that web page.
The proving procedure presented above was also
utilized in several further formal scientific proofs
completed for the first time in the world by the
author of this web page. These further proofs
are equally important for each one of us and
for the entire our civilisation as the above formal
proof for the existence of God. Also, as so-far,
subjects of these proofs were on purpose ignored
by the old, official "atheistic orthodox science" -
means by this old monopolistic science which
erroneous claims people still are forced to
learn in schools and at universities.
For example the same formal proving procedure
allowed the author, amongst others, to formally
prove that the "counter-world does exist".
(The term "counter-world" is a scientific name
assigned to a world that is separate from our
physical world, in which God lives, and which
religions, and also folklore, calls "another world".)
A formal scientific proof for the existence of counter-world
completed with the use of methods of mathematical
logic, is presented in item #D3 of a separate web
page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and also in subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of my newest
The same proving procedure allowed also to prove
formally that "God created the first pair of people".
The author's formal scientific proof that the "first man and
the first woman were created by God", also completed with
methods of mathematical logic, is presented in item #B8
from the separate web page named
and also in subsection I1.4.1 from volume 5 of the newest scientific
The formal scientific proof that "people have eternal souls"
is presented in item #C1.1 of the web page about
In turn e.g. the formal scientific proof that "God authorised
the Bible" is presented in item #B1 of the web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself.
How God look like:
"According to totalizm we live in God, according to religions God lives in us."
God actually is NOT a person, as we
were made to believe. (I should stress
here again that by the term "God" this
web page understands the most superior
source of intelligence and self-awareness
of the entire universe, means the self-aware
combination of three components to which the
and the Christian religion refers under the
name "Holy Trinity" - composed of "God
Father", "Holy Ghost", and "God Son".)
Namely God is the thinking
combination of three components,
such as: (1) intelligent
(which of a kind of natural "liquid computer"
contained in a separate world called the
counter-world), (2) natural, self-aware
that resides in this counter-matter, and (3)
that this "program" forms dynamically from
this intelligent "counter-matter" - such as
atoms, planets, human body, light, etc.
It happens this way because this intelligent
liquid substance from the counter-world called
is the carrier of the intellectual attributes
that allowed the evolution and activity of
the self-aware program that forms the
thinking component of God. This counter-matter
in the natural state is able to execute the
process of thinking and memorizing information.
In turn being such a volume of thinking
substance and natural programs contained
in it, God does NOT have shape that would
be possible to define at our present level of
knowledge. Or more strictly - the shape of God
is simultaneously the shape of the entire
universe. (Unfortunately, on the present level
of our knowledge we do not know what exact
shape has the entire universe.) But all data
indicate, that the shape of the universe does
NOT resemble outlines of a human figure.
Rather opposite, according to deductions
carried out according to the philosophy of
totalizm and derived from the definition of
energy, it appears for example that most
probably the shape of an entire universe
is close to a carelessly squashed by someone,
a thin, folded "pancake". (Deductions about
the shape of the entire universe are published
in subsection JE3.7.1 from volume 9 of monograph [1/4].)
The fact that God really is a gigantic, natural,
self-aware program contained in the kind of
like a "liquid computer" - means in the intelligent
substance called "counter-matter", is explained
in item #B1 of the web page
evolution.htm - about the process of intelligently controlled evolution.
In next items of that web page is also explained
"down-to-earth", how through the appropriate
pre-programming of this "liquid computer" God
created "matter" from our physical world - in turn
from this "matter" He then created, amongst others,
humans. According to these descriptions, and
to totaliztic definitions of God, "we really live in
the body of God". Exactly the same fact of our
"living in the body of God" is also clearly confirmed by the
Bible (which, according to item #B10 below, is a kind of "autobiography" of God).
Namely, in the Biblical "Acts" 17:27-28
a statement is contained, quote: "... so
that they would look for him, and perhaps
find him as they felt around for him. Yet
God is actually not far from any one of
us. In him we live and move and exist. ..."
These verses confirm the truth which
totalizm and the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
established about the appearance and
nature of God, and what is explained in
At this point the reader may be interested to know
"who" and why is interested in making us believe,
that God looks like a human. Well, there is such
"someone". And he does it for vital reasons.
By making people believe that God looks like
a person, only that He has special powers,
this someone accomplishes that he can repetitively
impersonate God. This is because of his
impersonations of God that so many people
see God. (True God does NOT show openly himself
to people who are still alive. After all, He lives
in a separate world, has size and shape of the
entire universe, while people like inside of His
"body". He shows himself in the form of a
beam of light, and talks to people, after their
physical death.) These supposed sworn
adversaries of God, which pretend that
they like to impersonate God, are evil creatures
which for important reasons in reality are
"simulated by God Himself" - as this is
described in items #F3 and #F5 below.
These creatures in past were called
"devils", "serpents", or "dragons". But
presently they are called "UFOnauts".
More about these evil creatures which
for important reasons are simulated by God
Himself is explained in part #F of this web
page, as well as on separate web pages
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
ufo.htm - about UFOnauts,
day26.htm - about deadly tsunami induced technically by UFOnauts,
cloud_ufo.htm - about clouds that hide UFOs,
antichrist.htm - about Antichrist,
and on many other totaliztic web pages.
Whether God is really composed of "Father", "Holy Ghost", and "Son" - as the Christian religion states this:
Totalizm and the Concept of Dipolar Gravity confirm, that the most superior
being in the universe, whom we usually describe with the use of a single
word God, actually is composition of three basic components. What is even
more interesting, names "Father", "Holy Ghost", and "Son", given to these
components by ancient Israelites to describe them, really reflect their
essence extremely well. Of course, in present days we already have a miniature
model of the structure and operation of the universe in form of a computer,
so we can afford to describe and define these three components of God in a much
more precise manner. And so, according to totalizm and the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity, the component which ancient Israelites named God Father, presently
we can name much more precisely with a term "liquid (universal) computer" (or "UC").
This is because it represents the entire volume of the intelligent liquid
called "counter-matter" which is capable of thinking in a natural state, and
thus which is the provider of intelligence to this superior-being called God.
At present this liquid is contained in a separate world called the "counter-world".
In turn the component of God which by ancient Israelites was called Holy
Ghost, presently we can describe much more precisely with the name "universal
intellect" (or "UI"). This is because it is a kind of the "operating system"
for the universe, means the most superior natural program which controls the
operation of "universal computer". Finally the component of God which by ancient
Israelites was called God Son, presently can be described much more precisely
with the term "our physical world". This is because it is our physical world
separated from the "counter-world" by impenetrable barrier, which is controlled
by God indirectly via laws which he established. Each individual person is
a basic unit or a basic part of this physical world (world of matter).
It is worth to notice from item #B8
below, that there is a strict hierarchy
amongst these three components of God.
The first and the most primary component
of God is the God Father - who exists
since infinity, and will exist forever.
The second component of God is this
female Holy Ghost - the existence of
which has its beginning, because She
appeared as the outcome of natural
self-evolution. The third component
of God is the God Son - who was created
by the Holy Ghost through appropriate
programming of shapes taken by various
manifestations of this intelligent
"liquid computer" called the God Father.
More comprehensive descriptions of these
three basic components of God are provided in subsections I3.2, I2 and I1
from volume 5 of monograph [1/4]. In turn the "counter-matter" is also described
on this web page in item #J2 below. Basic information about these components,
and about liquid counter-matter and counter-world, is also presented
on separate web pages about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and about the
intelligently controlled evolution of man.
So how many Gods is there and do we have any empirical evidence that there is only one God:
This "Holy Trinity" described in the previous
item #B5, in fact represents three basic
components of the same single God. The
distinguishing between these three components
is a kind of clinical subdivision, similar to
distinguishing between human body, mind,
and subconscience by present medicine,
or to distinguishing between hardware,
software, and peripherals by present computer
experts. In other words, these three basic
components of God, namely the God Father,
Holy Ghost, and God Son, do NOT contradict
at all the fact, that there is only one God, or
more strictly - only one superior and self-aware
The existence of only one God does NOT stop
various people who use different languages to
refer to this single Godly-being under many
different names. This is a natural situation.
After all, for example the name of my patron,
"Saint John" also in various languages is
written and pronounced differently e.g. as
"Jan", "Johan", "John", "Ian", "Giovanni",
So if someone lists together various names
by which this only God is known in different
languages, then it turns out that there is several
hundred of these names. This in turn causes,
that fighters of so-called "atheism" utilise the
existence of many names for the same God
as their crown arguments that supposedly God
does NOT exist. So typically if we discuss God
with an atheist, then this atheist immediately
asks "about which God you are talking?".
Therefore, quite a vital for us is to get to know
what evidence confirms, that in fact there is just
a single God, not an entire crowd of Gods, and
that all religions of the world really pray to the
same, the only existing God.
A good example of the evidence for the existence
of just the single God, is the lack of fights and
wars between gods. As this can be easily
documented on the reality which surrounds us,
whenever more than one being competes for the
access to the same resource, then these beings
with the elapse of time begin to fight amongst
themselves. So if there are more than one god,
then these gods would be forced to compete
between themselves e.g. for borders of their
influences at people, for specific subdivisions
of the world, etc. In the result, with the elapse
of time inevitably there would be a war between
these gods. In turn a war between gods would
be very destructive and we, people, for sure would
notice it. Therefore, because we do NOT see such
a war, this means, that for sure at present must
exist just a single God.
Does God have "personalities":
Us (people) are used to believe, that
everyone has just a single personality.
After all, we remember that one our relative,
known as a grumpy person, the only
thing that he could do is to be grumpy.
In turn our friend a joker, the only thing
that he can do is to make jokes from
practically everything. However, the
number of drastically different personalities
utilised and imitated by God reaches around 100.
Only that these personalities are formed into a
hierarchical structure of like a pyramid. From
the empirical research carried out by totalizm
on these personalities of God it stems, that their
complete description which seems to be closest
to the reality, is provided by the Hinduism religion -
see item #B6.1 below. This is because apart from
the most perfect personality of God, that resides on
the apex of that pyramid, all other personalities of
God display having human-like imperfections. In
turn these personalities which are close to the basis
of that pyramid sometimes display even evilness.
Many of these personalities of God we encounter
in our lives repetitively and sometimes we can
even recognise them from their characteristics,
behaviours, voice, favourite sayings, etc. After all,
these are so designed, that they possibly in a best
manner illustrate unique attributes and behaviours
of specific religious figures. For example, in areas
where Christianity dominates, frequently met such
personalities are Jesus, Archangel Michael, and
Satan. In turn on the area where Chinese Taoism
prevails, a frequently encountered personality is
so-called "Monkey God". On the area of Hinduism,
frequently seen are practically all personalities of
the main "deities" of Hinduism. What even more
interesting, these different personalities of God
look as if they fight with each other to take the
control over our life. Thus we have periods in
our life when we are tortured by some sadistic
personality, then the control over our life takes
e.g. a joker, then e.g. we have a period of getting
clear help and successes, etc., etc. For me
these different personalities of God that "fight"
with each other to take control over our life,
resemble a Pantheon of quarrelling Greek
or Roman gods, or different "deities" ("bodily
representations") of the only God of Hinduism.
Interestingly, the most superior in the hierarchy
of these imperfect personalities of God is a
kind of perfect creature which has NO personality
on its own, which stands like in a shadow,
which does NOT maintain direct contacts with living people,
and which decides with which imperfect personalities
in which period of our lives we supposed to be treated.
This perfect superior godly creature deprived a
personality seems also to control over the entire our
life - although it always works like from hiding and
in a manner that is unrecognisable to us.
Fig. #B1ab: The lack of feeling of pain in Hinduism
devotees who participate in the religious ritual
that every year around the end of February is practiced in Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. Bodies of these people were adopted (i.e. "possessed") by the
awareness of God which in case of each one of them imitates
one amongst many very characteristic personalities that are
attributed to subsequent deities of Hinduism. In order to prove
that their bodies loose human attributes, during this ritual
they are penetrated by sharp objects visible on the above
photographs. These objects do NOT cause any pain nor
bleeding in them. In turn after the objects are removed, their
skin automatically closes, without leaving any wound or scar.
Although the above photographs do NOT illustrate this, people
the bodies of which were possessed by these deities of Hinduism,
in fact move, assume extraordinary poses, make characteristic
gestures, and emit special sounds, which are unique to a given
personality that possessed their body. When finally to their bodies
returned is their own awareness, these people do NOT remember
anything from the entire experience. So the only thing that remains
for them as a souvenir from this ritual, are photographs taken by
their families and descriptions of the extraordinary behaviours
that are repeated to them by people who accompanied them.
(Click on an above photograph to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #B1a (left):
A picture that is most frequently seen during the
Thaipusam ritual, are such male devotees of
Hinduism, in which the skin of their backs is penetrated
by tens of steel hooks as if for catching fish. To
these steel hooks strings are attached which are
hold by one amongst relatives of the person who
subjects himself to this ritual. Interestingly, personalities
which are possessing bodies of these people run
uphill along 272 stairs that lead to the altar located
inside of the Batu Cave, that relatives which control
these strings typically must hold them down in
their rushing uphill to the altar.
Rys. #B1b (right):
Indian women which participate in the Thaipusam
ritual typically pierce their cheeks with long spike.
If they carry dishes with milk on their heads then
typically they pierce their tongues with slightly
* * *
Participants of the Thaipusam ritual typically
take part in it to pay back to God a favour
which God gave to them. Namely, there is
a tradition in Hinduism, that in critical situations
it is permitted to ask God for a favour, declaring
in return what one is going to do when God
accepts the offer for this favour. For example,
if in a family someone is mortally ill, then one
amongst members of this family declares in
a small religious ceremony, "God if you heal
this member of my family, then a next Thaipusam
I will carry ..." (e.g. "kavadi"). If God
fulfils His part of such a deal, then the person
who makes such a declaration must fulfil his
part as well. Of course, there are various levels
of sacrifice which subsequent devotees of Hinduism
declare - depending on the weight of the favour
for which they ask God. For example, the most
light sacrifice is to bring to the altar in Batu Caves
a pot with milk (two such cases are visible on the
photograph "b" above). A more significant sacrifice
depends on carrying to the altar a hand-burning
dish with some burning holy substance. In turn the
highest sacrifice is to carry to the altar so-called
"kavadi" - means a heavy ornamental
altar of Hinduism. Myself for several subsequent
years of my professorship in Malaysia researched
what happens during these Thaipusam rituals. Also
for several years I watched a transformation of one
European devotee of Hinduism, who after his body
was possessed by one amongst personalities of
Hinduism God, assumed poses, make characteristic
gestures, and danced, exactly in the same manner
as this was done by Indians whose bodies also were
possessed by personalities of Hinduism deities. And
one needs to remember that richness of extraordinary
poses and gestures that are assumed by deities of
Hinduism are so great, so unique, and so oriental, that
there is NO chance that any European, even a professional
dancer or actor, could learn these and repeat these in
an aware manner.
How the list of different personalities of the same God is described by the religion of Hinduism:
The religion of Hinduism by many researchers
is considered to be the oldest on the Earth.
The voluminous holly scriptures of it, which
are equivalents of the
are estimated to be at least 5000 years old.
So it looks as if when God inspired the
Hinduism amongst people, most clearly He
passed to the humanity one amongst the
most accurate descriptions of His own
personalities. Unfortunately, this almost
a perfect in Hinduism picture of God Himself,
is NOT at all complemented by equally
clear explanation of morality, principles
and goals of life, etc. (Probably this is why
God was forced to create later further
religions which provided to the humanity
the information that is lacking in Hinduism.)
According to the religion of Hinduism,
there is just one God, called "Brahman".
He has no shape nor form, and is omni-present.
Therefore He Himself does NOT contact
still alive people. But when this only God
"Brahman" decides to appear amongst
people, then He temporally creates one
amongst a whole array of His own representations
or personalities, which He designed especially
for His use. Only that these personalities
He enriches (i.e. "possesses") with
His own awareness and His own mind.
Every different one amongst these
numerous representations, personalities,
or incarnations of the only God "Brahman"
is described exactly as a different so-called
"deity" of Hinduism. Because devotees
of Hinduism pray separately to each of
these different personalities (or "possessions")
of God, the rest of the world believes
wrongly that Hindus have more than
one God. However, in reality Hinduism
recognises just a single God, which
depending on the nature of His contact
with still living people, can assume the
form of any amongst a whole array of
these "deities" or "incarnations" (i.e. this
"deity" who turns out to be the most
appropriate for a given action). Deities
of Hinduism are formed into a kind of
pyramidal hierarchy that is illustrated
by their family links. Just below the apex
of this pyramid, means just below
"Brahman", the Hindu Holy Trinity
is located. It includes three most significant
amongst such "deities" - means different
personalities of the only God. The Trinity
includes the "creator" (named "Brahma")
who creates everything, the "sustenance of
life" (named "Visnu") who controls the lives
of everything that is alive, and the "destroyer"
(named "Siva") who destroys everything that
is old and useless in order to prepare the room
for creation of something new and useful.
In the next layer of this pyramid are "descendants"
of these three deities, e.g. "Ganesha" or "Murugan" -
whom are sons of "Siva" (other deities also have
their numerous offspring). Then is a next layer,
e.g. "Hanuman", etc., etc. The lower a given
deity is located in this pyramid, the more like
"human" imperfections, deviations, nastiness,
and sometimes manifestations of even evilness
he displays in his contacts with humans. Thus
legends claims that e.g. already Siva himself
had rather not typical "habits". In turn his sons
are NOT angels at all (actually no-one today
would like to have anything to do with them).
For example, in the behaviour of his son
"Ganesha" hits the indulgence, laziness, lying,
and cheating, while "Murugan" (shown and
partially described in "Fig. #1" from the web page
is, amongst others, the reason for which Hindu
massively harm themselves during the Thaipusam
rituals - as this is shown in "Fig. #B1ab" above.
Also each one amongst these deities have his
own unique personality, so that from his behaviour
devotees of Hinduism very easily can recognise
with which deity they just encountered.
Is God "He" or rather "She":
The whole God, means all three components
of God considered as a single superior being, is dominated by masculinity.
So the whole God is "He". As this is going to be explained below, masculine
are two components of God (out of three), by ancient Israelites called
"God Father" and "God Son", while by totalizm and the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity called "universal computer" (UC) and "our world of matter".
Thus in fact, when we do not indicate that we refer specifically to
the third (feminine) component of God, we should refer to God as to
"He". However, we must also remember, that the third component of God,
which by ancient Israelites was called "Holy Ghost", while by totalizm
and by the Concept of Dipolar Gravity is called "universal intellect"
or (UI), displays decisive feminine attributes. Thus this component
is actually "She".
In spite that the above question
may appear to be slightly naive, in present times of rampaging
feminism and the war of sexes, it becomes increasingly valid.
After all, these are our present times when females invented the
famous feministic joke: "when God created males SHE was only
joking". Of course, because of the growing urgency of this question,
totalizm has no other option but to explain what is its official
stand in this matter, and to justify the origin of this stand.
Here is this explanation and justification:
The Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and
also totalizm, officially agree with the findings of ancient Chinese
about the essence of "masculinity" means "yang", and the essence of "femininity"
means "yin". (These findings are quoted at the end of subsection H2 from
volume 4 of monograph [1/4].) So totalizm agrees that the essence of
"masculinity" means "yang" is represented by the so-called "dynamic dipolar fields",
means by every field that is similar to magnetic field or to a dynamic field
formed e.g. by air pumped along closed loops by a home vacuum cleaner.
Totalizm agrees also, that the essence of "femininity" means "yin" is
represented by the so-called "static monopolar fields", means by every
field similar to a static electrical field or to any pressure field,
e.g. the one which is formed due to compression of air in a balloon
or in a car tire. Thus the official stand of totalizm and the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity is, that "masculinity" is expressed by a "dynamic
dipolar field", while "femininity" is expressed by a "static monopolar
As this is explained in subsections
H4.2, H5.1 and H5.2 from volume 4 of monograph [1/4], the structure and
operation of the "counter-world" are such, that the dominating in it is
a "dynamic dipolar field". This is because even when in the counter-world
local "static monopolar fields" are formed from which e.g. electrical
fields are composed, still these static fields are maintained in a stable
state by dynamic dipolar fields. This practically means that the component
of God by totalizm named "universal computer" (UI) while by ancient Israelites
called "God Father", in fact represents an essence of "masculinity", means that
it is decisively "He". In turn the component of God which by totalizm
is named "universal intellect" (UI), while by ancient Israelites was called
"holy ghost", in actually formed as a typical static monopolar field. After
all, it is a kind of algorithm or a highest level program. So this
"universal intellect" or "Holy Ghost" in fact represents the essence
of "femininity", means it is decisively "She". (Examples of "typically
feminine", because almost "contradictive", behaviour of this logically thinking
component of God, include the situations when God obstructs for people
the completion of highly moral activities which the same God actually wants
people to complete - such examples are described in "part #G" of the web page
and also in item #K2 of the web page
Finally, the dominating primary field in the world of matter, is the gravity field.
In turn according to the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, gravity field is a dynamic
dipolar field. So the Israelites' "God Son" who represents the "world of matter"
(while represents "our world" in totalizm) constitutes the essence of "masculinity".
In total, two out of three components of God represent the essence of masculinity,
one out of three represents the essence of femininity. Thus as a whole God
is more masculine than feminine. So whatever a reaction to this statement
is going to be, the official stand of totalizm and the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity is that in God as in whole dominates "masculinity",
means God is "He". However, totalizm simultaneously confirms
officially, that God contains in itself one component (i.e.
"Holy Ghost" or "universal intellect"), which is "She".
According to findings of my
"theory of everything" called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
and also according to some statements from the
(for an example see item #I2 from the web page named
the first (hardware), and simultaneously
the most primary component of God, exists
since infinity. It is about it, that religions
state "God always existed". It is also
this component of God, that Christianity
calls it the "God Father" or the "Ancient of
Days" (e.g. see the Bible, Daniel 7:9-22) -
while the Concept of Dipolar Gravity calls it
the "liquid computer" or the "universal computer",
although actually it is the four-dimensioned
limitless space entirely filled up with the liquid
so-called "counter-matter" (for more details
about this constantly moving liquid called
"counter matter" - see items #B2 and #B3
from the separate web page named
In turn the second component of
God self-evolved gradually from that
intelligent and self-learning
liquid called "counter-matter",
which presently prevails in a
separate world that exists parallel
to our physical world. This second
component of God by Christianity is
called the "Holy Ghost" or "Word" -
see the Bible, Evangel of St. John,
verses 1:1-14. The reason for such
a name for it is that this second
component of God in reality is a
natural program which
operates inside of a that liquid
computer which is constituted by
the intelligent counter-matter. In
turn during times when religions
were born, people did NOT know
the idea of "programs" yet. So
they used ideas which are
related to "program", namely terms
"Ghost" or "Word". ("Word" is an
"information", means "algorithm",
means "program".) For example,
the Biblical sentence
"In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God.",
contained in the Evangel of
St. John 1:1, in present times
we would express much more
precisely with the sentence
"The beginning of everything
was the Program, and this Program
operated inside of counter-matter,
and the Program represented God."
The philosophy of totalizm calls this
second (self-evolved) component of
God with the name "universal intellect".
The third component of God, by
Christianity called "God Son",
while by totalizm called "our
physical world", was created by
the second component of God, means
by the universal intellect, through
appropriate programming of shapes
that are formed from the first
component of God - means from
that liquid computer called "counter-matter".
The self-evolution of the second (software) component
of God (means "Holy Ghost" or "universal
intellect") was almost similar to present
explanations of human science about the
coincidental evolution of man. Only that
the evolution of God was slightly more
dramatic, and simultaneously much simpler
structurally. The comprehensive description
of the process of gradual self-evolution
of this second (software) component of God
is presented on several web pages, for example
in items #B1 to #B2 from the web page named
or in item #I2 from "Part #I" of the web
page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
I highly recommend having a look at these
web pages. They describe not only the self-evolution
of the second component of God, but also
the later process of creation of our
physical world, as well as the process of
intelligently controlled evolution of man.
Why God carefully hides His existence from people - means the "free will" and the "Canon of Ambiguity" which limit many actions of God:
Let us imagine how people would react if
God rapidly appears on the heaven and
begins to hit with lightning bolts everyone who
has a different opinion than God Himself.
Of course, in such a situation everyone
would agree with God in everything. And
in order do NOT have by any chance a
view that differ in some matter from that of
God, all people would be afraid to have
any own view. Therefore the entire creativity
of people and all searches for a new knowledge
would cease to exist. So in order to allow the
fulfilment by people their role of "ants" which
expose the skeleton of the truth from darkness
of unknown - as it is explained in item #C1
of this web page, God was forced to give to
people the so-called "free will". In turn this
giving the "free will" has its consequences.
For example, God cannot show Himself to
people, because people would loose this
"free will". Also God cannot do anything in
such a manner that it immediately becomes
clear to be His action.
So in order to NOT deprive people of this
"free will", everything that God does must
be carried out according to the general
principle which by totalizm is called the
canon of ambiguity.
This canon is described in subsection
JB7.4 from volume 7 of monograph
The "canon of ambiguity" states that
in the universe nothing can be fully
unambiguous and deprived sources of
all doubts, because then the people who
confront it would be deprived the right
to their own free will and the right to choose
their own views and the path through the life.
This is because of this canon that every true
miracle must allow to be explained on many
different ways. This is also because of the
action of this canon that every proof for
the existence of God can be attempted to
be explained also in an atheistic manner.
Probably the most drastic consequence of the
"canon of ambiguity" is that God must make sure
that people are NOT certain of the God's existence -
as this is explained in item #F2 of the web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth.
In practical terms this means that God Himself
must promote on the Earth not only atheism,
but also the lack of morality, evil behaviours, the
philosophy of prasitism,
etc. Means God not only must be God, but also
must simulate Satan.
The "canon of ambiguity" is discussed in more
details in "part #F" of the web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself,
as well as in "part #C" of the web page
will.htm - about maintaining the free will of individual people while controlling the entire human civilisation.
Did God write His own autobiography:
YES, God wrote His own autobiography.
It is called the Bible, while a
comprehensive descriptions of attributes
of it is provided on the totaliztic web page
biblia.htm - o tajemnicach Biblli autoryzowanej przez samego Boga.
Of course, in writing His own autobiography
(means the Bible) God was also obliged to
obey the "Canon of Ambiguity" described in
previous item #B9. This is why only some
people notice that the Bible is in fact the
autobiography of God.
What are two basic principles of carrying out unlimited implementation capabilities of God -
means (1) the permanent "creation" of creatures provided with the so-called free will, and (2)
the "simulation" (means like a temporally creation) of creatures deprived of the free will:
Let us temporally put ourselves into the situation
of God, or more strictly into the situation of
one amongst numerous personalities of God
which is characterised by a high sense of
humour. So when being in the situation of
a humorous God, we would firstly created
a man, let us name him Jan, to whom we
would grant the "free will" so that he could
have his own views, and we would give to
him a relatively long life - so that he would
have enough time to write down these views
in his monographs. However, then we would
decide to have a bit of fun. So knowing that
this Jan is interested in UFOs, from time to
time we would create for short periods of
time various creatures which Jan would believe
are UFOnauts, but whom we would NOT
give neither the "free will" nor a soul, but
for whom because of our sense of humour
we would pin our own humorous personality.
Of course, after each confrontation of these
"UFOnauts" with Jan, we would annihilate them.
After all, having godly creative powers we
could create again these UFOnauts each
time when they would be useful for us.
The above situation, although purely hypothetical,
perfectly explains two different kinds of "creation"
which God is carrying out. The first kind of "creation"
serves the giving life amongst others to permanent
creatures, e.g. to people, which receive their own
"free will", their own "self-awareness", their own
"soul", and their own "life". In turn the second kind
of "creation" in present times would be called with
a different terminology of a
Namely, God creates something just temporally,
while removes it just after it ceases to be needed.
If whatever God simulates is a living creature, then
God does NOT give to it neither "self-awareness"
nor the "free will", nor "soul", nor "life", but only
temporally inserts into it His own self-awareness,
and does with hands and body of this whatever lies
in His godly interest.
Both these kinds of "creation" are described in the
Bible. Unfortunately, both of them use the same
name "creation". And so, according to the Bible
God "created" both the man, as well as "demons",
"serpents", "devils", "Satan", etc. But in present
terminology this "creation" of supernatural creatures
(like "demons", "serpents", "devils", "Satan", etc.)
we would now rather call with the use of this newer
So let us now define the most vital differences
between the terms "creation" and "simulation"
used on this web page to describe two basic
processes completed repetitively by God and
in the Bible described with the same term "creation".
Thus on this web page the term creation
means the process which is completed by God,
and with which can be described, amongst others,
the permanent formation of people supplied into
their own "free will", "self-awareness", "soul" and
"life". In turn the term simulation
is a different process also completed repetitively
by God, with the use of which God forms temporally
various creatures or machines which He intends
to confront with people, but which do NOT receive
neither the "free will" nor own "soul" or "life", while
for the awareness of which God inserts His own
self-awareness. In other words, the
is like a temporally "impersonation" under which
hides God Himself when He decides to show Himself
to a living person or to a group of living people.
What are reasons for repetitive "simulation" of creatures and objects by God -
means e.g. reasons for the "temporally creation" of various bodies to which God
"embodies" later His mind thus forming a multitude of "bodily representations of God":
In order to stimulate and to intensify our searches
for knowledge, and also in order to easier subject
us to various tests (see descriptions of these "tests"
in item #C6 below), God creates countless
with which He then confronts selected people.
These "simulations" are objects and creatures
which permanently do not exist in a given place
and time, but which God creates temporally only
to confront with them a selected person or a
selected group of people. In fact it turns out
that practically almost everything that present
people describe as "unexplained", actually
belongs to this category of "simulations"
created temporally by God. Depending on
the need, these temporary simulations of
God receive the form of (1) various inanimate
objects (such as devices which people
supposed to develop soon, objects which
the humanity supposed to learn about, visions,
extraordinary phenomena, etc.), or the form
of (2) various living creatures. Let us discuss
now both these categories.
In case of temporary simulation of the existence
of (1) inanimate objects, God simulates extremely
precisely not only their appearance, but also their
behaviour, phenomena that they induce, etc. Thus,
these objects look exactly as if they do exist and
work. A best example of such objects temporally
simulated by God in present times are UFO vehicles.
God simulates these "UFOs" in order to inspire
people to build on the Earth vehicles similar to the
In turn in past such inanimate simulations of God
included, amongst others: airships, so-called
"ghost-rockets", planets, suns, comets, etc., etc.
(Actually, these "simulated" by God "ghost-rockets",
which were a kind of plague in Scandinavia of
1950s, sporadically appear even until today. For
example, on Wednesday, 10 November 2010, in
all evening news of New Zealand television was
shown a short film of just such a "ghost-rocket"
which apparently was launched from the Pacific
Ocean near to the West Coast of the USA. It was
silent, spectacular, it was leaving a giant trail of
vapours as it climbed upwards, and it was seen
and filmed by a lot of Americans. The ministry
of defence of the USA claimed that it probably
was an optical illusion as it was NOT visible on
radars, and that for sure none of American
militaries launched it.)
When God temporally simulates (2) living creatures,
then for this purpose He forms for them bodies
similar to human bodies, and then connects their
minds to His Godly mind, as well as provides them
with one amongst His countless personalities. In the
result such creatures in fact are "bodily representations
of God" on the Earth (or "embodiments of God").
Thus, in spite that they have the knowledge of
God, they do NOT have their own "free will" and
they do precisely whatever God orders them to
do, and also in the manner in which this doing
suits God. In order to give here several examples
of whatever God most frequently simulates, then
in present times this includes: UFOnauts, Yeti,
various masked individuals who at present
anonymously express themselves in Internet,
spirits, etc. In turn in past such simulations of
God included: angels, devils, various supernatural
creatures, etc. The attribute of these simulations
of God is that for humans these are undistinguishable
from the reality. For example, creatures that are simulated
by God (e.g. the relatively frequently met UFOnauts
and Yeti) have individual personalities and characters,
tones of voice, habits, can be individually recognised
and met again, etc. But that these are simulations,
not really existing creatures or machines, certifies
the fact that they do NOT have their own so-called
"free will". Means, in spite that they appear, behave,
and form physical traces of their existence - as if
they really existed, these simulations do exclusively
whatever God wishes them to do, and in the manner
in which God wishes they do it. In this way God has
an absolute and personal control over consequences
of their actions. In turn, if these were really existing
creatures or machines that have their own "free will",
then God would NOT have so strict control over them.
Thus they would do whatever they would wish, instead
of doing what lies in the interest of God.
It is also worth to notice the consequence of the
use by God of these frequent
which for people are indistinguishable from the
reality. One such a consequence is that the reality
that surrounds us has like two different levels,
namely the truly and permanently existing reality,
and also the reality that is temporally "simulated" by God.
An illustrative explanation how was initiated and
then developed the idea of these "bodily
representations of God" (or "embodiments
of God") are provided in items #D1 and #D5
from the totaliztic web page
Whether God sometimes links temporally one amongst His many personalities, and His own awareness, to bodies of selected people:
YES, I myself watched and researched such
linking and I saw it with my own eyes. In many
religious rituals God links temporally His own
awareness and one amongst His own personalities
to bodies of selected people. After this linking
the awareness and personality of God, a given
body begins to behave in a manner known from
the behaviour of that particular personality, and
NOT like the original owner of that body. For
example, if this linking is carried out during
Hindu religious ceremonies called "Thaipusam",
organised in Batu Caves near Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia, then the personality which possesses
a given body of a Hindu devotee begins to
behave like a specific deity of Hinduism. Means,
it begins to move in a strange manner that is
visible on religious paintings of Hinduism, begins
to emit sounds like that deity, is also resistant to
pain and cannot be harmed in such a manner
that blood flows from it. In turn when this linking of
a God's personality is carried out during a Chinese
religious festivity of Taoism called the "Festival of
9 Gods" (organised on 9th day of 9th month of
Chinese lunar calendar), then the body of this
person begins to behave like one amongst these
9 Gods of Taoism - e.g. like the highly characteristic
and easy for identifying "Monkey God" shown
below in "Fig. #B2". For example, this body can
walk on fire and do NOT burn itself, or walks on
sharp blades of swards and do NOT cut itself.
Later, i.e. after the original soul of the owner of
given body is returned to it, this person does NOT
remember what he or she was doing when his
or her body was taken by one amongst these
Fig. #B2a: A gigantic image of the so-called "Monkey God"
erected behind the altar of a Hindu temple. This deity (God)
is the most characteristic personality of God which very frequent
possesses bodies of people during various religious rituals of
the far East. The above "Monkey God" is worshipped in three
different religions of the East, namely in Hinduism (where it is
called "Hanuman"), in Buddhism (where in Cantonese dialect
it is called "Si Jin Hung"), and in the Chinese Taoism (where
in the Mandarin dialect it is called "Sun Wukong"). Therefore
his very characteristic attributes and behaviours can be noted
in behaviours of numerous people the bodies of which were
possessed by this Godly personality during any form of religious
trance that results from various rituals of these three main
Eastern religions. (I.e. people possessed by the "Monkey
God" really behave like monkeys.)
(Click on the above photograph to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #B2a (middle):
The above figure of "Monkey God" stands by the Batu Cave
in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The photograph above was
taken in August 2008. So this representation of that deity
originates from Hinduism.
The personality of God that manifests itself via
the "Monkey God" is famous from many things.
For example, in Buddhist folklore it is known from
72 "magic" transformations with the use of which
the Monkey God transformed itself into various
other animals and objects.
Between us, creatures described in items #F4
to #F10 of this web page under the name of “UFOnauts”,
also sometimes are seen as in view of witnesses
they rapidly transform their appearance from
human creatures into any animal, object, or fruit
(e.g. into a banana). In the article “Goat held for
armed robbery in Nigeria” from page B2 of New
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Monday January 26, 2009, is
described a case when a significant group of
police volunteers chased two hooded (like monks)
robbers who were breaking onto a car. After
one of them was caught, he in sight of an entire
group of witnesses rapidly transformed into a goat.
(This police group still detained the goat and placed
it in a prison.) Because our science to-date had no
explanations for such transformations, the existence
of them was denied so-far. However, in the light
of information provided here in items #B11 and #B12,
such transformations are possible and actually occurring
in reality - only that so-far are scoffed at, ignored
and not documented.
God versus man - means what
determined scientifically about the role of man
in God's plans:
Why God created man:
God created people and constantly motivates
them for knowledge, means for inducing
a continuous development and evolution of
the universe. (However, we would not be far
from the truth if we jokingly state that God
created us "out of boredom".) After
all, if God did NOT create anything, He would
exist alone with the entire empty universe.
So He would not have anything to contemplate
and to develop. Also He would not have
reasons nor inspirations for increasing His
own knowledge, nor He would have anything
with what he could occupy His gigantic mind.
In turn, because He is an intelligent being,
with the elapse of time He would probably "die
of boredom". In addition, His knowledge would
not have reasons to grow. So in order to preoccupy
Himself with something, at the beginning He
probably created some primitive organisms
and started to experiment with them. Then He
discovered that by "playing" with these organisms
He not only had a lot of fun, but also learned
a lot of new things. So He invented of what
today human scientists call the
and proceeded with
creating increasingly more perfect organisms. His knowledge grew fast. He
had also a lot of fun observing his creations. With the elapse of time he
created organisms so advanced as people. People gave him a lot of fun
with their behaviours, and also generated a lot of opportunities that he
learned new things. Of course, in the meantime he also committed a lot of
mistakes. Various mythologies state that God needed to destroy world
already several times because he did not like where his creations were
going. I personally believe that if with the elapse of time it turns
out that the work of present moral laws is insufficient for maintaining
the balance between "moral" and "immoral" behaviours of people, and if
one day "immoral" behaviours start to dominate the universe, God will be
forced to destroy the universe once more, to make a room for creating
a better one with more powerful moral laws. Since the time of creating
a man God experiments with increasingly more perfect systems, societies,
laws, etc. Due to this, the universe continually develops itself and
evolves to increasingly more perfect forms.
In other words, when creating the man God
assigned to it a specific task. If we would illustratively
show this task on an example - as this is done
in item #B3 of the web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" on fate of the entire humanity,
then "knowledge" and "truth" look in the universe
like some very complicated "white skeleton" hidden
under a black mass of darkness which represents
"unknown". People in turn can be compared to
small ants which reveal this white skeleton
of knowledge from the dark mass of "unknown",
thus gradually exposing to eyes of God the entire
outlines and shapes of "knowledge".
It should be mentioned here, that there
is a tangible evidence for the fact, that
the goal of existence of people is the
induction of a continuous development
and evolution of the universe towards
increasingly perfect forms. Several
examples of this evidence is indicated
in item #B4 of the web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" on fate of the entire humanity.
Let us review here at least the most
representative categories of this evidence:
The "relative imperfection" of God. (Please
notice that this term uses for God the highly
imprecise terminology that was created to
describe people - thus in order to understand
it correctly one needs firstly learn the definition
of it.) This "relative imperfection" and its
consequences are defined and explained
in item #M1 of the web page
evolution.htm - about the process of intelligently controlled evolution,
and also in item #B4 of the web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" on fate of the entire humanity.
One amongst manifestations of it is that
"God still does NOT know everything, therefore
He must continually increase His knowledge".
In turn it is known, that if any intelligent being,
including God, is aware of its own imperfection,
then it undertakes actions aimed at removing
this imperfection. In case of God, the most
effective, most fast, and most safe manner
of increasing His knowledge (especially about
Himself) was to create creatures "on His own
image and similarity", and then to study
these creatures carefully.
Such programming of the universe, that it forces
continuous perfecting and increase of knowledge.
One of the most visible examples of just such
programming are so-called
These laws were established in such a manner,
that they force people to continually increase
their knowledge. (After all, with the increase of
knowledge of people, the knowledge of God must
also grow. This is because a principle is in operation similar to this
one that manifests itself during the increase of knowledge in students
which always causes also the increase of knowledge in their teacher.)
If someone hesitates with the increase of his or her knowledge, these moral
laws immediately punish such a person. Therefore, for example the widely
used by God method of motivating, which in subsections JA2.4, JB2.1 and
JC11.1.1 from volumes 6 and 7 of monograph [1/4] is described under the
name of "a stick and a carrot method" (see also item #F1 below) is one of
such evidence for the fact, that men were created to guarantee the
continuous development and evolution of the universe.
The orientation of moral field. Other meaningful
evidence for the creation of people just to guarantee
the continuous development of universe is the fact,
that the direction "uphill" in the so-called
precisely coincides with the so-called "line of the greatest
intellectual effort" - as more comprehensively is explained
in subsection JA4.1 from volume 6 of monograph [1/4].
Thus, through forcing people by moral laws to
continually climb uphill in the moral field, the universal
intellect simultaneously forces humanity to continually
improve the intellectual level.
Creation of imperfect people. A regularity
is in operation in the universe, that if in an environment
with moral principles of behaviour something is
created with an initial assumption that it is imperfect
and that it is going to require a further perfecting, then
such something continually develops and continually
becomes increasingly perfect. In turn everything
that from the very beginning is considered to be
perfect, either does not strive, or ceases, the
further development - thus with the elapse of
time it transforms into an absolute anachronism.
I noted this regularity already in times of my youth,
when in my surroundings children from the imperfect
but acting morally families always excelled in
everything and accomplished success in lives,
while children from families considering themselves
to be walking perfections, never managed to
accomplish anything vital. It was because of
the operation of this regularity, that from the
very beginning of the creation of the scientific
theory of everything
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and the philosophy called
I embedded permanently into their structure
that they are imperfect and that they never
become perfect, this they are going to require
continuous perfecting during the entire time
of their existence. In this way I tried to protect
them from the fate which paralysed the present
orthodox science and practically all religions,
namely that they believe in their own perfection,
thus practically for some time now they ceased to
develop, and with the elapse of time they become
increasingly stagnant. It is also because of the
detection of this regularity that totalizm adheres
to the principle, that realising any imperfection
to intellects with moral principles of behaviour
motivates these intellects to undertake efforts
towards removing this imperfection.
(Notice, however, that this principle works only
for intellects with moral habits of behaviour.
Immoral intellects every imperfection explain
as an evidence of superiority over others and
instead of eliminating it, they rather try to
make it deeper.)
In the light of the regularity described here,
intentions of God become clearly visible.
Namely, through the creation of humans
highly imperfect, and through continuous
illustrative reminding to these people how
imperfect they really are, God forces every
person to continually work on perfecting
himself or herself. In turn when people
continually perfect themselves, together
with them perfects also the entire universe.
On the other hand, if God created people
already perfect from the very beginning,
what actually could do - if wished, then these
people would NOT have any reasons nor
motivation to continually work on their
further perfecting. This in turn would bring
the stagnation to the entire universe.
Modelling of people "on own image and similarity
of God". From the progress of human knowledge
on the so-called "modelling and simulation", it is known
to us that if one wishes to get to know something
exactly, then one needs to prepare a "model" of
it, then through studying this "model" and through
"simulating" with it the behaviour of the object of
research, one learns exactly also about this object.
In turn from our own experience people know well,
that "most difficult to get to know is ourselves".
Putting together these two facts, God clearly has
difficulties with thorough getting to know Himself.
But being aware of His own knowledge-deficiency
in this matter, God tries to find a manner to learn
also about Himself. Therefore He created His own
model in the form of man, while now He simulates
His own behaviours on this model and then studies
these thoroughly. In this way God have found a manner
how to get to know Himself in a most effective way.
Continuous subjecting the humanity to various
"experiments" and "simulations". Many situations,
experiences, and events to which God continually
subjects people, are NOT needed by people to keep
them developing. Examples of these include suffering,
persecutions, wars, unwise political leaders, mosquitoes,
and many others. But God still subjects people to these
unpleasant experiences. So the only justification
for the reason why He serves these experiences
to us, is that they represent a Godly equivalent
of "simulations" used also by people in cases
of studying "models" for a better getting to know
objects that these models represent. In other words,
many experiences which are served to people, can
be explained only as needed by God so that God
gets to know Himself better.
Whether God gave the humans a religion that can be considered to be better from other religions:
NO, there is no one religion which would be
better from other religions. If God gave to
people a perfect religion, then He would
deprive them from the motivations to seek,
improve, increase their knowledge, etc.
Therefore every religion, similarly like every
person, has both good sides, as well as
various disadvantages and imperfections.
However, we must remember, that a significant
proportion of every religion - i.e. that proportion
which people had NO opportunity to deviate
with their erroneous interpretations, states
the truth. So our task is to analyse subsequent
religions and compare outcomes of these
analyses with empirical research on God -
as this is done by the scientific discipline of
In this way gradually people will improve their
reliable knowledge about God - which is one
amongst numerous tasks that God imposed
Which manifestations of obedience God expects from us:
If we believe religions, all what is
required from us in lives, is to spend as much time as we can in churches,
mosques, or temples, to give to religious institutions as much as possible,
and to avoid committing religious sins. In additions to this, some religions
impose various additional requirements, e.g. to pray to God five times a day,
to give God offerings each mornings, etc.
In turn is one analyses the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity, then it turns out, that God is providing us with very
clear directions, as to what exactly he expects us to do in our lives.
These directions are written into the so-called
which we all are obliged to obey pedantically in our lives. (If we do not
obey them, then according to the "carrot and stick method" we are severely
punished by these laws. But if we do obey them - then we are rewarded lavishly
by them.) As it turns out, into the content of these moral laws is written
only one primary requirement, which God imposes on people, and the obedience
of which he executes from us with an iron hand. This requirement written
into moral laws not always coincides with what religions are saying we
should do. This single and the only primary requirement imposed upon us by
God and expressed with the
that he established, states that "everything that we do in our lives,
we must do in a 'moral' manner". So if we do anything in a 'moral'
manner then we are lavishly rewarded by these moral laws in several
ways simultaneously. But if we do something 'immoral' in our lives, then
these moral laws will punish us very severely. But even more interesting
is that the operation of these moral laws is so pre-programmed, that we
are rewarded or punished in our lives for each single our action separately.
Means that in our everyday lives the "justice" is served in portions,
for each our action separately, NOT "globally" for the entire live in
a single go - as religions claim. Moreover, moral laws reward us or
punish us still in the same physical life, only that with a time delay
which typically amounts to several years.
However, at this point we should
clearly realize, that the terminology "moral" and "immoral" in the light
of these moral laws does not necessarily coincide with the same terminology
defined by religions. (I.e. whatever according to moral laws is "moral"
does not need to be moral according to a specific religion, and vice versa.)
By the term "moral" the moral laws understand everything that is carried out
in such a manner that it "does NOT break any moral law, nor does NOT walk around
any moral law". In turn by the term "immoral" the moral laws understand
everything that is carried out in such a manner that it "breaks moral laws".
(Notice that apart from "moral" and "immoral", totalizm identifies also
"pseudo-moral". This "pseudo-moral" is everything that "neither obeys moral
laws, nor breaks these moral laws, but only walks carefully around them".
This attribute of "pseudo-moral" is displayed by almost everything that
on Earth is carried out by present "UFOnauts", means by former "devils"
described in item #F2 below.)
Although we are charged with
only a single primary requirement by the God himself, namely to pedantically
obey moral laws in everything that we are doing, moral laws impose
on us their own secondary requirements. These secondary requirements are
the ones which we must obey in order to fulfil also the primary requirement,
means the requirement to always act "morally". In order to give here some
representative examples of these secondary requirements, they include,
Continuous analyzing and thinking. Namely, moral laws require, that in
everything that we do we must act according to a "line of the highest
intellectual effort", means according to a line which climbs exactly uphill
in the so-called moral field. Such continuous climbing upward in the
moral field is enforced by the moral laws. In turn this "moral field" is
so intelligently designed, that the direction "exactly upward" in it coincides
with the "line of the maximal intellectual effort". Means that God, who
established laws of the universe, most obviously wishes that people put the
highest intellectual effort which they can yield to everything that they
are doing. This means that God actually does NOT want from us just countless
repetitions of mindless prayers, but expects that we contribute our
intelligence and intellectual effort into everything that we are doing,
including our prayers.
Continuous lifting our knowledge. The operation of moral laws is quite
complex. In order to learn it exactly, we need to put effort into learning.
For example, in monograph [1/4] the comprehensive learning of moral laws
requires reading and thinking through as many as 5 volumes, namely (in
the order listed here): 6, 4, 5, 7 and 8. But if someone does not learn
these laws, it is uneasy to obey them in our lives. This in turn will
result in frequent being punished because of breaking them. So through
establishing such a situation, God clearly lets us know, that wishes
we continually lift our knowledge.
Perseverance and consistency. Moral laws punish or reward us for each
our action separately (not just one time for the sum of our lives - as
religions tell this to us). In turn such their action indicates that
God is interested we do not "give up so easily". So if one time we do not
do something right and we break these laws, we should learn a moral lesson
from it and try better a next time. This means that the manner in which
moral laws work imposes on us the requirement of perseverance and consistency
in our effort of self-improvement.
Notice that a list of moral laws
discovered so-far, into which, amongst others, are written the above requirements,
and also is written a whole array of other secondary requirements, is contained
in subsection I4.1.1 from volume 5 of monograph [1/4]. In turn the origin
and operation of moral laws is described in chapter JA from volume 6 of
* * *
Requirements imposed on us by God can be strictly
verified in every life situation and by everyone. There is quite a simple method
for this verification. This is because moral laws always fulfil a series of very
clearly defined attributes and questions, which everyone is able to check in
relation to each action that he or she is undertaking in the real life. A precise
description of these requirements is provided in subsection JA5.3 from volume
6 of monograph [1/4], while an example how to use them is provided in subsection
JC11.1 from volume 7 of monograph [1/4].
How we can communicate with God in both directions:
In order to communicate with God, we do not
need to go to a church, or to a temple. (Although visiting a separate "God's
home" helps some of us to put themselves into a psychological state aimed
at "religious reflections".) After all, we are all time submerged in God.
(Means, we are submerged in this thinking substance that we call God.) God
surrounds us from all sides in every single moment of time. He is "hearing"
every single our thought. Furthermore, he is watching carefully every single
movement that we make and action that we take.
People learned and utilise in practice a whole
array of methods of a direct and two directional
communication with God. Let us list here most
effective amongst these methods.
1. A direct communication via the "conscience".
People have an extraordinary
"counter-organ" in their body. Popularly
it is named conscience. In fact
this counter-organ represents God in us.
So it performs in our body a function of
the God's ambassador. It is also a kind
of direct "hot telephone line" which links
every person directly with God. It actually
allows us to receive replies to our questions.
Only that these replies are in a different
language from the spoken one which we
normally use. (This different language is
called ULT - the "Universal Language of
Thoughts". It is described briefly in item
#B4 of a separate web page about
while more comprehensively - in subsections
I4.1.2 and I5.4 from volume 5 of monograph
We are able to learn this language by
constant tuning ourselves into whispers
of our conscience. These whispers are
always formulated in the ULT language.
In turn when someone learns this language,
he or she can receive via it the correct
answer to practically every question that
he or she asks God. For more information
about the counter-organ of CONSCIENCE,
see subsections JA10, I5.3 and I4.1.2 from
volumes 6 and 5 of monograph [1/4] (or
subsections A9 and K4.1.2 from the older
monograph  Totalizm)
downloadable from this web site free of
charge via "Menu 1" or
2. Living words. Another manner of two-directional
communication with God are so-called "living words"
described in m ore details, amongst others, in item
#C3 of the web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself.
3. Superstitions, dreams, cards, indications of pendulums, etc.God has this principle,
that He accepts various non-written "agreements"
with individual people. Then from His
side He sticks to these "agreements". So if a person
deeply believes in something, within the frame of
these non-written "agreements" God typically causes
that this belief begins to come true. So if this belief
is e.g. a "superstition" - means a kind of agreement
with God which links in pairs two kinds of apparently
"coincidental" and not-linked events, then God causes
for this individual person that the "superstition" is
working. In this way God uses the "superstition" to
communicate to this person what is to happen soon.
In a similar way God uses also dreams, indications
of playing cards, divining pendulum, etc. - but only
in relation to these people who make with God just
such a non-written agreement and they "believe deeply"
in outcomes of indications that God passes to them
with the use of a given something. Similarly like all
other ways of communicating with God, this method
also do NOT work for sceptics and unbelievers.
4. Internet. Since the time of establishing the
Internet, or more strictly since the establishing of
various Internet discussion forums and lists, many
personalities of God described in items #B6 and
#B12 of this web page, in fact are appearing over
there anonymously. Unfortunately, typically these
personalities simulate negative stands which represent
the views of creatures described in part #F of this
web page. Still, in spite that these personalities
belong to a negative group, through the discussion
with them one can get many positive information and
messages authorised by God Himself.
Whether God is "merciful" and "kind":
God does not know
forgiveness, as religions make us to believe for political reasons.
Thus, we actually must repay the undesirable consequences of every single
action that we take in our lives. Only that these consequences come back to us
with a significant time delay, usually of at least 5 years. (This time delay
is necessary to "arrange" the appropriate return for us, which is corresponding
to our actions.)
But it is worth to notice, that this
iron hand and consistency with which God punishes each single our "immoral"
action via the moral laws that he established, is balanced by equally iron and
consistent hand in rewarding each single our "moral" behaviour. So practically in
his actions God behaves more like a computer or an automat, than like a "merciful
Jesus" about whose unlimited "kindness and forgiveness" religions teach us.
Means God consequently makes sure that absolutely each one of ours "immoral"
actions is punished. But he also makes sure that absolutely each single our
"moral" behaviour is rewarded. (Notice here, that on this web page the
expressions "moral" and "immoral" always are used in their totaliztic
understanding, explained in item #C2 above.)
However, in spite of this consistency
with which God implements his absolute justice, still he manifests in his actions
towards people an attribute which can be called the "kindness". Only that this
attribute does NOT manifest itself through forgiving us our sins - as this
various religions tell us naively, or for political reasons. This attribute
is manifested through the manner and exact moment of time in which we receive
the punishments and rewards that we deserved with our previous actions. Namely,
punishments and rewards are always so served to us by God, that they shape
our development in the most beneficial manner possible, and also that they
mutually balance each other in a given moment of time. (E.g. if God is forced
to serve a pain to us, he simultaneously serves to us also a joy of some sort
which we deserved with some earlier our action, and vice versa. Hence the
saying, "if God shuts up a door for you, he always opens a window", or "every
rose has a thorn".) Expressing this in other words, his "kindness" God
manifests through such serving the absolute justice to us, that it is
the most beneficial for us and that it exerts a best possible influence
on our lives.
Of course, as probably the reader
expects this, the actions of the being so unlimitedly perfect as God, are
much more complex than it can be expressed in the above reply composed of
a few sentences. Therefore, in order to learn more thoroughly how really
God operates, one needs to read volumes 4 to 9 (i.e. chapters H to JF)
of monograph [1/4].
Why totalizm forbids forgiveness and why it compares forgiving to "giving apples from the tree which does not belong to us":
As the research by totalizm and the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity indicates it,
God acting via the "moral laws" which
he established, in fact does NOT know
forgiveness. His moral laws act almost
equally automatic like a present computer,
or like laws of physics. We endure all
consequences for practically everything
that we have done in our lives. Only that
these consequences arrive to us with a
time delay reaching several years (this
is because the exact moment when
consequences are forwarded to us God
chooses in such a manner that it is the
most beneficial for our development).
is also unknown to the special moral
organ which we have build into ourselves,
and which is called the "conscience".
This conscience knows the content
of all moral laws in existence. So whenever
we intend to do anything against commands
of these moral laws, the conscience clearly
warns us against it. In spite, however, that
this conscience always knows exactly
what is the most moral thing to do in
a given situation, practically almost never
it pushes us to forgive someone a true
fault. The reason is easy for realising.
Namely the forgiveness is contradictive
to moral laws, and contradictive to the
will of God.
So how it happened, that being contradictive
to the voice of conscience, to the moral laws,
and to the will of God expressed through these
moral laws, the forgiveness, and also the
absolution of sins, still is so strongly forced
by the religion. The reply is simple. The
religion introduced forgiveness and also
absolution of sins for political reasons.
This is because with the use of forgiveness
and absolution, the religion has a greater
control over its followers. Due to the potential
to forgive and to absolute, every sinner who
begins to realise consequences of whatever
he or she has done, is attracted by the religion
like by a magnet - if wishes to obtain such
forgiveness, or such absolution of sins.
Unfortunately, the ability to forgive is a
"two-edged sword". If someone tries to
determine the most vital reason, why Christianity
during over 2000 years of operation could
not cause the lift of level of human morality,
this reason would turn to be "forgiveness"
and "absolution of sins" introduced to the
religion. Because of this readily served
promises of forgiveness and forgetting of
our sins, people stopped to try harder to
perfect their morality. Thus the ones who
without forgiveness would normally tried to
curb their weaknesses and improve their
behaviour, knowing about forgiveness
fall victims of their desires and repeat their
crimes. In the result, after over 2000 years
of operation of Christianity, the level of morality
(or rather "immorality") in present people does
not differ much from this level in ancient times
when Christianity was just born. In turn, in religions
other than Christianity the situation sometimes
is even worse - for examples see news in
almost every present newspaper.
The question which rises at this point, is whether
people actually are allowed to act on the God's
behalf and promise forgiveness in matters for
which there is no forgiveness. Again, moral laws
state that NO! "Giving forgiveness is like giving
apples still growing on the tree which is not ours".
Independently whether people (us) give forgiveness
to others, or refuse to give forgiveness, still the ones
who seek it must endure all the consequences
of whatever they have done. Simultaneously the
forgiveness deprives them motivations to try
harder in the future and to control their actions.
So when a next time someone asks us, whether
we forgive him or her, we are allowed to reply,
that the philosophy of totalizm forbids to promise
forgiveness, because to forgive would be to
usurp to ourselves competences of God.
In turn God very unambiguously expresses
this via the voice of conscience and via
the content of moral laws, that forgiving
is contradictive to his will expressed through
moral laws and through the voice of conscience.
Although the life must go on independently
of whatever someone have done, still there
is no forgiveness for anything and everyone
must bear all the consequences of every his
or her action.
* * *
The philosophy of
distinguishes a special kind of immoral
action, which could be called the "overdoing
with good intentions". The most known
example of it is a dominating love of
mother, means a love which usually is
displayed by mothers of an only child.
Such love cuts the loved person from the
connection with the real world, shields this person
from all troubles, and makes impossible
to learn self-sufficiency. In the result, it
harms the loved person. It is this kind
of immoral actions that the saying describes
"hell is paved with good intentions".
Totalizm classifies also "forgiveness"
and "absolution of sins" to this destructive
category. It considers forgiveness
to be equally immoral as active
revenge is. In fact totalizm charges
forgiveness with the responsibility for
the lack of moral progress of humanity.
Therefore it forbids to forgive in our lives.
According to totalizm, our good intentions
towards guilty ones should be expressed only
by refraining from an active revenge. Here
is the list of reasons for which totalizm
forbids to forgive the evil that is purposely
done to us:
Absolution of sins would destroy the consistency
in God's actions - for details see subsection
I3.6 from volume 5 of monograph [1/4].
After all, it would force God to act differently in
each individual situation. In turn, the lack of
consistency would induce randomness
in God's actions and would make
principles of these actions impossible for
discovering by people. In turn without ability
to discover what are correct principles of
conduct, people would not be able to improve
their morality, nor themselves. Thus, the
absolution of sins would ruin completely the
reason for which God introduced morality,
moral laws, moral field, etc.
Forgiveness runs against moral laws.
As such, totalizm defines forgiveness as an
immoral activity which cannot be practiced in
life. It should be added here, that an immoral
character of forgiveness could be proven also
on several further manners (not described here),
which are explained more comprehensively
in volumes 7, 6 and 5 of monograph [1/4].
Voice of our conscience never urges us to forgive.
But the same voice always tells us correctly
what we should do in a given situation.
The forgiver assumes the right to represent
the competence of God, although in fact does
not receive such a right from God.
In turn just to assume that one has such a
right, in itself is an immoral action and those
who practice it are going to be judged for it.
(We must remember, that God perfectly
represents himself and never asks for
assistance in relieving him in his duties.
So the only thing that people are permitted
to do, is to research and to determine
his intentions, and then describe it thoroughly -
like the science is doing this with laws of
physics. However, taking actions supposedly
on the God's behalf, when we really do not
know what God's intentions are, is just an
The forgiveness was artificially introduced
for political reasons. As such, it should
be eliminated from practice. After all
practiced should be only whatever results
unambiguously from the research of laws
that govern the surrounding reality.
Forgiveness promises a lack of consequences
when actually these consequences are still there
(means, it is a kind of lie). Even if we forgive someone,
still this someone must pay back the entire harm
that he or she did. So it is better if we allow this
person to be aware what is going to happen.
Forgiving prevents the guilty people from putting
more effort into the work of improving their morality.
So practically it is the forgiveness which takes
responsibility for the lack of improvement in the
level of morality within the world which surrounds us.
It is worth to add here, that the matter of
forgiveness has a key significance for both,
religions and totalizm. Therefore it is impossible
to support it clearly and convincingly in such
a brief presentation. Readers who wish to learn
more on this subject, should read volumes 7, 6
and 5 from monograph [1/4].
"Tests" to which God subjects people:
God created the mankind for the purpose.
This purpose is to increase the knowledge
of both: (1) God and the entire intelligent
universe, and (2) humans themselves.
Thus, the entire our life is just a long lesson
to learn, and a continuous series of exams.
Each subsequent exam from life God issues to us
in the form of another "test" which we either pass or
fail. An example of such a "test" which we already identified
and described relatively well, and about which it is known
that God continually subjects us to it, is the "test for
atheism". God designed it so perfectly, that if we pass
it, then the gain is both ours and the entire humanity.
In turn if we fail it, then the gain is just for the humanity
(our is just a loss). For details see items #A2 and #C5 of the web page
will.htm - about maintaining the free will of individual people while controlling the entire human civilisation.
Unfortunately, people who fail this "test for atheism" gain
a rather special treatment which is described in item #F3 of the web page
totalizm.htm - about totalizm means about the most moral philosophy in the world.
For example, all facts indicate that such people are
treated by God exactly the same as animals do, in
this number they are even reincarnated into animals
instead of people. To repetitive "tests" is also subjected
the entire human civilisation. An example of just such
a test through which the humanity just is going, is the
"test for a hidden occupation of the Earth by evil
UFOnauts" - about which I am writing a bit more
in "part #F" of this web page, and also in "part #F"
of the separate web page
evil.htm - about origins of evil on the Earth.
Also this test was so cleverly designed by God that
if the humanity passes it, then it becomes beneficial
for both the humanity and for God - after all the humanity
will be then advanced to a higher level of morality. But
if the humanity fails it, then still God will benefit from this,
as it will allow Him to maintain and to use previous tools
(i.e. simulations of "UFOnauts" or "devils") for controlling
the further fate of individual people and the entire human
Are there known any items of scientific evidence for the existence of immortal soul, and what happens to this soul after our death:
If we carefully look around, then it turns
out that identified so-far has been a similarly
large number of
scientific evidence for the existence of soul,
as that number we already know of the
scientific evidence for the existence of God.
Thus the major problem with evidence for
the existence of soul is the same as with
the evidence for the existence of God -
namely the certainty and confidence that
the soul really does exist cannot be given
to someone for free, but one must himself
or herself earn it with the own searches
and own contribution of a labour
(for details see item #B1 from the web page
soul_proof.htm - with the review of scientific evidence for the existence of soul).
These readers who wish to familiarise themselves
with the scientific evidence for the existence
of soul that was already identified by the
author of this web page, should either have
a look at the entire totaliztic web page
or at least have a look at item #C1.1 from the web page
In turn what happens to the soul after one
dies, it is described quite thoroughly in the
Bible authorised by God Himself.
Only that the Bible uses rather an archaic
language and imprecise terminology, which
in order to understand one needs firstly translate
into the present precise scientific language.
A sample how to carry out such translation
of biblical expressions into the present scientific
language is presented, amongst others, in
items #I1 to #I3 from the web page
soul_proof.htm - with the review of scientific evidence for the existence of soul.
determined about methods that God uses
to control the fate of individual people and
entire human civilisation:
How God controls the fate of the universe, that this fate develops according to his intentions:
God utilizes in practice a whole array of
methods to control the fate of the physical
world and people, so that this fate unfolds
according to His intentions. In order to illustrate to the reader
the true span of these methods, below I am
briefly describing at least these ones amongst
them which in a beast manner represent
the diversity of their major categories:
The method of "a carrot and a stick". The most
effective method of motivating people, that is commonly
used by God, can be called the method of "a carrot and
a stick". An example of practical implementation of this
method, is the work of
which God established and from the obeying of
which He thoroughly examines people - for details
see item #I1 from the web page named
For example, if someone does NOT wish to obey
these "moral laws", or does not want to accept
the fact of their existence, then is punished -
means is repetitively hit with a big "stick" and
with ever increasing force, for as long until he
or she starts to obey these laws. In turn these
people who obey "moral laws" in their lives,
are rewarded, means they get a "carrot" from
God. (This carrot can take a form of e.g.
The method of a carrot and a stick is mentioned
in several items of this web page - e.g. see
also items #C1, #C2, #F1 and #F7. It is also
discussed in further totaliztic web pages - for
example see item #C6 from the web page named
and in other totaliztic publications (e.g. see
subsections JA2.4, JB2.1 and JC11.1.1
from volumes 6 and 7 of my slightly older
Control over time. On everyday basis God
controls the fate of everything through His power
over an elapse of "reversible software time" - which
power He executes due to special software entity
called "omniplan". It is God which decides
what is to happen in the future. Also God designs
the future in such a manner that it always unfolds
according to God's intentions. A good understanding
of the mechanism with which God controls the
future, can be accomplish by reading items #C3
and #C4 from the web page named
Embedding the solution into every problem.
God created the present universe in an extremely
intelligent and foresighted manner. This huge
intelligence and precaution emerges from
practically everything. For example, because
of it everything that can create a problem
has also intelligently hidden solution for this
problem embedded into itself, while the
trigger that fires this solution is always under
the control of God. One of the most perfect
examples of just such a problem with a solution
contained in itself, which I encountered in my
research to-date, is so-called "imprisoned
immortality" described in more details in
items #H1, #F4 (7) and #F7 of this web page.
From this form of immortality can also benefit
even the most evil civilizations of the universe -
such as the civilization of
which secretly occupies our planet and which
is described in Part #D of this web page. After
all, in order to accomplish such immortality, it
is enough to reach appropriate level of technical
development, or more strictly to build so-called
However, the problem with the civilization which
accomplishes this kind of immortality depends
on the fact, that it is able to do a lot of evil.
Simultaneously it becomes indestructible and
impossible to be defeated by other civilisations
(e.g. by people from the Earth) which still do not
have time vehicles. This is because by shifting
time back it is able to solve for its own benefit
practically every problem it has. It can also
consider itself to be untouchable and not punishable
even for God. After all, it mastered time travel
and may avoid any punishment through shifting
time backward. Therefore, during the designing
of this "imprisoned immortality", God embedded
a kind of the "final solution" to this particular problem.
This final solution takes a form of tendency of
such a civilization to self-destroy itself in a distant
past. Thus, as it is explained in items #H3, #F4 (7),
and #F7, such a civilization leads the life which
represents a "non-existing existence".
Means, it apparently does exist and gets behind
the skin of everyone, but in fact it already does NOT
exist for a long time. After all, in the appropriate
point of time from the far past, it is going to blow
itself up. In turn the best moment of time when
it needs to blow itself up, chooses for it this non-obliging
God from whom in the extreme pride this civilization
turned out many years ago.
Programming of everything with codes, the execution
of which is triggered by appropriate "keywords".
In item #3 (3) of the web page about
evolution of people
it is explained that behind every code an intelligence
must stand. This principle works also in the reverse
direction. In fact every intelligence finally expresses
everything in the form of a code, while every code
it provides into a "key" which triggers the operation
of it. For example, in order to open our access to
computers, we use programs for codes, while
"logins" and "passwords" for keys to this codes.
In order to use a bank, we use the account as
a code for our finances, while e.g. account number
and our signature or passport as an access to
this account. In order to read a book, we use an
alphabet and a language for a code, while a
title and the author as a key for finding this book.
Etc., etc. In exactly the same manner God acts.
He also programmed everything in the form of
appropriate code. In turn the unleashing of operation
of this code is accomplished via appropriate key.
The most of codes that God programs are
expressed in a special kind of language called
ULT. This language is briefly described in item
#B4 of a separate web page about
Also the "keywords" which trigger these codes usually
are some sorts of expressions spoken telepathically
in this ULT language. (In magic this triggering keyword
expression in the ULT, is called a "spell".) Therefore
when God wishes to complete a given action,
he can simply send a telepathic message in the
form of this keyword which triggers this action.
Because practically every phenomenon and action
was already programmed in some code and has
the triggering keyword in the ULT language, God
just through his words can do whatever wishes.
Probably it is why holy books state that always
at the beginning is a word.
* * *
Of course, there is much more methods to
control the fate of the physical world and
people, which God uses, but all of which
is no point to explain here. For example,
people sometimes are controlled through
putting desires or decisions into their minds,
which these people later take for their own,
but which push them to do whatever
God decides for them. Similarly, to
the "simulations" of UFOnauts God
always orders to do, whatever suits
God's intentions in the best way. A
number of further methods of God's
action are described in item #C6 from
my web page named
and in items A2.1 to #A2.10 from my web page named
At this point it is worth to mention, that
every method of action that God uses,
can be also used by people. In fact
methods of God's operation always turn
out to be extremely effective, deprived of
side effects, and leading to the success
in the fastest way possible. Therefore for
example the method of "a carrot and a stick"
turns out to be unreplaceable in bringing
up children and in training animals. In
turn method of finding and triggering a
solution that hides embedded in every
problem, allows people to overcome even
the greatest obstacles. It is enough to
remember in it, that every problem contains
a solution, and then concentrate on finding
this solution. Also "keywords" which trigger codes
that program the course of appropriate actions,
are used by people in magic and in hypnosis.
A lot of traditional magic by accident discovered
words or sentences which trigger appropriate
consequences, and then utilized these keywords
as "spells". In such a manner, e.g. on the
Easter Island magicians caused that boulders
ascended into the air and flown where ordered.
In old China some magicians managed to
discover "spells" which caused that bodies
of dead people raised on feet and walked to
homes. So in times when no fridges nor modern
transport existed, their descendants earned
for living by "walking home" dead who lost
lives far from families and family burial sites.
In turn in present Malaysia so-called "Bomoh"
with just such keywords are able to stop rain.
On the other hand present hypnotists form
their own codes and keywords which trigger them.
They call these "post-hypnotic suggestions".
Then they only say this keyword in the vicinity
of such a hypnotically programmed person,
while this person does whatever they ordered
him or her to do.
determined about so-called "angels":
In the light of information presented in items
#B11 and #B12 of this web page, the supernatural
creatures called "angels" can be defined as
follows. "Angels" are temporally "simulations"
of supernatural creatures which are peacefully
and helpfully oriented towards people and which
are deprived of their own free will, that God creates
for a short period of time in order to complete
with their hands some positive action which for
important reasons cannot be completed by God
alone or under God's name. In other words,
"angels" are simply some amongst numerous
"bodily representations of God" (described in
item #B12 above) supplied into positive
"personalities" of God, which are created in a
temporally physical form to be confronted with
people and to NOT allow people to realise that
they deal with God Himself.
Why God needs angels:
People are somehow so made up that the
greatness of others they estimate from the
size of the "entourage" that these others
have. Thus, even if someone is a king,
but is deprived his entourage, then in eyes
of other people he becomes just an ordinary
human. It is for this reason why beginning
from times of Elvis Presley, every more
significant American artist tries to form
and to always surround himself with his
own "entourage" which is going to give to
him the significance and recognition in
eyes of other people.
God is perfectly aware of this attribute of people.
Therefore, when in some matter He tries to
emphasize the significance of someone, then
this someone was confronting people not just
alone, but with the especially prepared for him
"entourage" the participants of which were called
How God creates these angels:
God has this attribute, that is able to complete
simultaneously millions of different operations.
Thus from the point of view of His functioning
God is similar to present multi-processor computers.
(This functioning of God similar to present
multi-processor computers is described more
comprehensively in item #C6 (3) of a separate
totaliztic web page
Thus when this omnipotent God needs service
of creatures called "angels", then He temporally
creates beings similar to humans, under minds
of which He pins His own mind - as this is
described in items #B12 and #B13 above
on this web page. Then to each one amongst
these temporally created beings God assigns
one amongst His numerous personalities - i.e.
the one which best suits a given task on hand.
Later God so controls the parallel actions of
these temporally created (simulated) beings,
that they precisely complete the tasks assigned
So do "angels" really exist:
YES and simultaneously NO. Means, "angels"
do NOT exist in the form in which they are
described by religions, means in the form
of fully spiritual beings that have their own
"free will" and their own "life" while having
the same consistency, origin, and place of
residence as God. In the counter-world there
is simply no room also for other superior
creatures, intellectually separate from God,
but acting as his helpers while simultaneously
almost equal in powers with him. The entire counter-world is
occupied by a single superior being, which is God.
However, similarly like "devils", also "angels"
do exist in another form. Namely these are
temporally "simulations" under the physical
form of which hides one amongst numerous
positively oriented towards people personalities
of God Himself.
In order to create for Himself the possibility of
future development of also scientific and atheistic
explanation for the "angels", in present time God
simulates these creatures in quite a meaningful
manner. Namely these are so created, that on every
aspect they resemble physical creatures, which are
close relatives of humans but originate from the cosmic
space, and which accomplished an enormous level
of scientific and technical advancement, while simultaneously
they uplifted their morality (i.e. in everything that they
do they pedantically obey all moral laws). These simulations
of creatures highly advanced morally and technically,
by ancient religions were called "angels". However,
presently and in the future we rather should call
them "totaliztic aliens" from space.
Fig. #E1: The drawing which reconstructs the appearance of
a small being which was so simulated by God,
that it appeared to be a creature from stars that
represents a totaliztic civilisation. The members
of this civilisation are simulated as if they help
people altruistically for thousands of years - thus
providing us with the template for the idea of "angels".
God so simulates all members of this civilisation
that they appear to live in the state of "everlasting
happiness" described in item #H2 of this web page.
This state is reflected in the expression of happiness
clearly visible on their faces. In turn the appearance
of the above being was so simulated that it appeared
as if it was send to us via a device called the "telepathic
projector", a description of which is provided on the web
(The above illustration originates from treatise [7/2]
where it is presented as Figure C1. It is also shown
in monograph [1/4] as Figure JF1.) It is the above
alien that gave to the humanity a design of the "telepathic
pyramid". Such a pyramid is one of the most simple
technical devices which illustrate the principle